Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Bill Wallace
- Postcode verified
SO14 7LY
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This was an area for development at the previous inspection. p.3
- The council recognises this and is taking remedial action. p.3
- The areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area. p.3
- Copy: Alistair Neill, Chief Executive, Southampton City Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 844
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 27, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Clive Webster Executive Director of Children’s Services and Learning Southampton City Council Civic Centre Southampton Hampshire SO14 7LY
p.1
arrangements within Southampton City Council children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Southampton City Council which was conducted on 4 and 5 May 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within Southampton City Council children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
arrangements within Southampton City Council children’s services
The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within Southampton City Council children’s services
The areas for development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in August 2010 have been considered during the inspection. The local authority developed an action plan and has made significant progress in most areas. However one area for development relating to the quality of management decisions and actions required recorded on case files is not yet fully addressed. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
arrangements within Southampton City Council children’s services
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
Workforce development and recruitment strategies are effective and have substantially reduced the use of temporary staff and increased the stability of the workforce. This has enabled the council to accelerate improvement in such areas as the quality of assessments.
p.2
Strengths
The council has implemented a robust action plan underpinned by rigorous monitoring and evaluation to address areas of development in the contact, referral and assessment arrangements. This has resulted in significant improvement in key areas such as the timely completion of core assessments.
p.2
Strengths
The council’s safeguarding joint protocol with the police for undertaking Section 47 enquiries has resulted in improved collaboration between partner agencies. It has led to the more efficient use of resources, better deployment of staff and improved the quality of assessments for children and their families. Its success has led to it being developed across Hampshire and the Isle of Wight.
p.2
following areas
Practice and procedures comply with statutory requirements to safeguard children and young people.
p.2
following areas
Communication and liaison arrangements are well established and result in prompt referrals from multi-agency partners and timely exchange of information.
p.2
following areas
All cases held within referral and assessment services are allocated to suitably qualified and experienced staff.
p.2
following areas
Children are routinely seen and interviewed where appropriate during assessments and the voice of the child is sufficiently recorded and taken into consideration in case planning.
p.2
following areas
The quality of the assessments seen was at least satisfactory, with some being good, however others remain overly descriptive and lack detailed analysis in some areas.
p.2
following areas
Record keeping is up to date and of a satisfactory standard.
p.2
following areas
Diversity issues are sufficiently considered in casework practice.
p.2
following areas
Arrangements for the assessment and support of children with disabilities are effective and in close collaboration with partner agencies. Social workers receive regular supervision which is well structured and recorded . Staff report that they are supported by managers and value opportunities for reflective case discussion that improves their professional development and the support they provide to children and their families.
p.2
following areas
Regular case audits by senior managers result in improved practice such as the quality of assessments.
p.3
following areas
Effective arrangements are in place for the prompt transfer of cases from the referral and assessment services to longer term teams so that the identified needs of children and young people are addressed in a timely way.
p.3
following areas
Information sharing and communication between the children’s out of hours service and daytime services are effective in ensuring that those children identified as at risk of significant harm are appropriately safeguarded.
p.3
Areas for development
Management decisions are routinely recorded on case files, however the quality of the decisions recorded and actions required in case plans is inconsistent. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
While thresholds for access to children’s services are clear, decisions on whether further actions are required on contacts are not consistent. The council recognises this and is taking remedial action.
p.3
Areas for development
While there is a prompt exchange of information at the point of referral, the outcomes of referrals are not routinely notified to referring agencies.
p.3
Areas for development
The areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Alistair Neill, Chief Executive, Southampton City Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion