Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Pietro Battista
- Postcode verified
SS2 6ER
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Some assessments are not sufficiently comprehensive and some lack rigorous analysis. p.3
- This was an area for development at the previous inspection. p.3
- The council and its partners are taking appropriate action to resolve this. p.3
- In some cases the referral assessment service response to domestic violence notifications is not sufficiently timely. p.3
- However, in some cases there are gaps in the regularity of the recording of supervision. p.3
- The council is taking action to correct this. p.3
- Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area. p.3
- Copy: Rob Tinlin, Chief Executive, Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment18
“Some assessments are not sufficiently comprehensive and some lack rigorous analysis.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 826
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 31, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 24%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Sue Cook Interim Corporate Director of Children and Learning Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Civic Centre Victoria Street Southend-on-Sea Essex SS2 6ER
p.1
arrangements within Southend-on-Sea Borough Council children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Southend-on-Sea Borough Council which was conducted on 12 and 13 April 2011. The inspection was carried out under Section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within Southend-on-Sea Borough Council children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic and paper case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
arrangements within Southend-on-Sea Borough Council children’s services
The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within Southend-on-Sea Borough Council children’s services
Most of the areas for development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in June 2010 have been addressed but the council acknowledges that further sustained improvement is required. However, further improvement in the quality and consistency of assessments is required. This area of work remains an area for development. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
arrangements within Southend-on-Sea Borough Council children’s services
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
Managers and experienced social work staff are readily accessible to social workers for case discussion, advice and direction. This is highly valued by staff and leads to good morale and low staff turnover, enabling consistency of provision to children and young people.
p.2
following areas
Thresholds for access to children’s social care services are clear and have recently been reviewed with partner agencies, to improve the awareness and understanding of the criteria across agencies.
p.2
following areas
Processes for screening and responding to contacts and referrals are robust. This enables relevant information to be gathered in order to facilitate prompt decision making.
p.2
following areas
Timely decisions are made in response to referrals of children in need and of children in need of protection, with clear management direction given to make clear the actions that are required.
p.2
following areas
In most cases assessments are timely, and case recording is sufficiently up to date.
p.2
following areas
Assessments, including Section 47 enquiries, are undertaken by suitably qualified and experienced staff.
p.2
following areas
Section 47 assessments are well managed and strategy discussions are held in a timely way and are appropriately recorded.
p.2
following areas
Decisions in relation to assessments are being well recorded and actions required are noted.
p.2
following areas
The diverse needs of children and young people are appropriately considered within assessments, particularly in relation to children with disabilities.
p.2
following areas
Good training and personal development opportunities are available to, and accessed by staff. Staff report that they value these highly.
p.2
following areas
Children are routinely seen as part of the assessment process and in most cases their views are recorded and taken into account.
p.2
following areas
Effective arrangements are in place for prompt communication and information sharing between the out of hours service and the referral and assessment services.
p.2
following areas
Arrangements for transfer of cases from the referral and assessment services are flexible and effective.
p.2
following areas
Robust performance management information is readily available and is regularly accessed by managers. Managers routinely undertake case audits and their findings are used well to improve the intervention in individual cases and to identify issues for service development.
p.3
Areas for development
Most assessments are of a satisfactory standard and some are good. However, the quality is too variable. Some assessments are not sufficiently comprehensive and some lack rigorous analysis. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
Notifications of domestic violence incidents by the police to the referral and assessment services are not consistently timely, resulting in delayed assessment in some cases. The council and its partners are taking appropriate action to resolve this. In some cases the referral assessment service response to domestic violence notifications is not sufficiently timely.
p.3
Areas for development
Most staff receive regular supervision. However, in some cases there are gaps in the regularity of the recording of supervision.
p.3
Areas for development
The outcome of assessments is not routinely notified to referrers. The council is taking action to correct this.
p.3
Areas for development
While management decisions and directions on referrals requiring further action are clear, the reasons for taking no further action on other cases are not always recorded.
p.3
Areas for development
Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Rob Tinlin, Chief Executive, Southend-on-Sea Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion