Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Matthew Brazier

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Matthew Brazier

  • Postcode verified

    SE1 3DY

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+60Positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivetimelystrengthconsistentlywell supportedsensitivepromptly
Criticismseriouslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings630w+64
  • What needs to improve132w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
762
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 23, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 17%

Full report text

Ms Romi Bowen Director of Children’s Services London Borough of Southwark Mabel Goldwin House 49 Grange Walk London SE1 3DY

p.1

arrangements within the London Borough of Southwark children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in the London Borough of Southwark Council which was conducted on 1 and 2 February 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within the London Borough of Southwark children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within the London Borough of Southwark children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within the London Borough of Southwark children’s services

All but one area of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in April 2010 have been addressed. Further work is required to embed the common assessment framework (CAF) across children’s services in the borough.

p.1

arrangements within the London Borough of Southwark children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Wide-ranging and innovative quality assurance systems, involving staff at all Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

Strengths

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk levels, demonstrate the service’s commitment to prioritising organisational learning and promoting individual and service development. This approach has contributed to the high morale within an increasingly stable workforce in the Referral and Assessment Service.

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Structural developments to the service, such as the establishment of the co- located pre-birth assessment team, have considerably strengthened multi- agency working, enabling a sensitive response to the diverse needs of the most vulnerable children and families, with a sharp focus on timely information sharing and early intervention.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Referrals are responded to promptly and identified risk is managed effectively in order to safeguard and support vulnerable children, assisted by procedures which comply with statutory requirements.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Assessments are timely. The majority are sufficiently detailed and analytical, and some assessments are good. Risk and protective factors are outlined clearly, leading to effective plans.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Equality and diversity issues are consistently taken into account during assessment and casework planning.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Recently revised thresholds for access to services have been agreed across agencies which aim to support continued progress in ensuring referrals are appropriate and of sufficient quality.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Children are routinely seen, and their views considered during assessment to inform plans and the delivery of services.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Child protection enquiries are undertaken appropriately, by qualified social workers, with evidence of good examples of strategy discussions with key agencies, including the police.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Record-keeping is up-to-date and sufficiently detailed. There is evidence of effective management oversight, including timely case supervision recording that provides clear directions for practitioners.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff, including newly qualified social workers, report that they receive regular formal supervision and that they are well supported by a visible and accessible management team.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Out-of-hours arrangements are effective, with good links to daytime services that ensures work is followed up effectively.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Caseloads are manageable and monitored effectively to support staff. This is supported by the current service structure, which provides the necessary flexibility to meet fluctuations in demand.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Training is accessible and valued by staff. Lessons from serious case reviews are acted upon and applied in practice.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ A high proportion of child protection enquiries do not result in initial child protection conferences and a significantly low number of initial conferences result in a child becoming subject to a child protection plan. This requires further investigation to ensure that resources are being used efficiently and that children and families are not subjected to unnecessary statutory intervention.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Implementation of the CAF remains underdeveloped. Further work is required to ensure the consistent contribution of all key agencies and to prevent the involvement of children’s social care where it is not necessary or appropriate.

p.3

Areas for development

The areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Annie Shepperd, Chief Executive, London Borough of Southwark Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion