Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Simone White

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Simone White

  • Postcode verified

    SK1 3XE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 30% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisecleartimelywell supportedeffectivelystrengthseffectivepromptly
Criticismat risknot consistentlyslowdelaysdelaybelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings670w+72
  • What needs to improve161w−75

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
831
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 27, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 19%

Full report text

Mr Andrew Webb Director of Children's Services Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council 3rd Floor Stopford House Town Hall Stockport SK1 3XE

p.1

Borough Council children’s services

This letter contains the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council which was conducted on 16 and 17 March 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to Ofsted’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services.

p.1

Borough Council children’s services

The inspection identified no areas for priority action but some areas for development, which are detailed below.

p.1

Borough Council children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising the incidence of child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff. I am grateful to you and your staff for your help and the time given during this inspection.

p.1

Borough Council children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the inspection identified a number of areas where the contact, referral and assessment arrangements were delivered satisfactorily in accordance with national guidance, in particular:

p.1

Borough Council children’s services

ƒ The management and prioritisation of contacts and referrals in respect of children considered to be in need of protection enables clear, timely decisions and actions. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk ƒ Communication and planning while undertaking child protection investigations are well supported by timely strategy discussions and meetings with the police.

p.1

Borough Council children’s services

ƒ Referring agencies have a clear understanding of thresholds for access to services based on Stockport’s Common Processes model. This enables appropriate contacts and referrals to be passed to the Customer Contact Centre.

p.2

Borough Council children’s services

ƒ Well trained and supported staff at the Customer Contact Centre offer a good range of advice and support to referring agencies and members of the public. All decisions about which contacts proceed to an assessment are taken by a qualified social worker.

p.2

Borough Council children’s services

ƒ Initial and core assessments seen were overall of satisfactory quality with some good examples containing clear analysis. All social workers spoken to by inspectors demonstrated a high level of skills in analysis and risk assessment often well beyond that evidenced in their written assessments.

p.2

Borough Council children’s services

ƒ Social workers receive regular supervision and value the overall support provided by their line managers, all of which contributes to maintaining a stable and committed workforce.

p.2

Borough Council children’s services

ƒ Information is passed appropriately between the daytime services and out of hours service to ensure continuity of provision for children and young people.

p.2

Borough Council children’s services

ƒ Senior managers collect and use performance data effectively to monitor the progress of social care work and other support work undertaken by schools and partner agencies.

p.2

Borough Council children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following strengths and areas for development were also identified:

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Well established multi-agency partnerships enable the provision of a comprehensive range of support and preventative services. All agencies use Stockport’s Common Processes Model including Team Around the Child meetings. Social workers also provide preventative services directly through the Social Care in Partnership with Schools team.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ All staff and partner agencies benefit from a comprehensive range of training opportunities. Social workers place high value on the training offered and are able to demonstrate how they have used this to improve their practice.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Good joint partnership staffing arrangements within the Early Intervention Team ensure effective communication between health and social care services, particularly when joint assessments take place in complex child protection cases.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Good management systems in the duty and assessment services support staff well to prioritise and plan all incoming work.

p.3

Strengths

ƒ The Children with Disability team provides good quality, timely assessments of children and young people’s needs. Following assessment, a comprehensive range of services is available through the multi-agency Disability Partnership.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Social workers report that the current electronic system is slow and complex to use. Senior managers are considering a number of options to help improve both the electronic system and recording practices.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ While all contacts where a child or young person may be at risk are dealt with promptly, some less urgent contacts received by the Early Intervention Team and which require further information to be gathered from other agencies prior to a decision being made, have been subject to delays.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ There is delay in the provision of services for some children and young people assessed as requiring support from the Family Support Teams. Monitoring of their welfare, while awaiting support, does not consistently or robustly consider significant changes to family circumstances.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: John Schultz, Chief Executive, Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Andrew Webb, Chair of Stockport Safeguarding Children Board Mark Weldon, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Stockport Metropolitan Borough council Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion