Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Simone White
- Postcode verified
SK1 3XE
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Senior managers are considering a number of options to help improve both the electronic system and recording practices. p.3
- Monitoring of their welfare, while awaiting support, does not consistently or robustly consider significant changes to family circumstances. p.3
- Copy: John Schultz, Chief Executive, Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Andrew Webb, Chair of Stockport Safeguarding Children Board Mark Weldon, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Stockport Metropolitan Borough council Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 831
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 27, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Andrew Webb Director of Children's Services Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council 3rd Floor Stopford House Town Hall Stockport SK1 3XE
p.1
Borough Council children’s services
This letter contains the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council which was conducted on 16 and 17 March 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to Ofsted’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services.
p.1
Borough Council children’s services
The inspection identified no areas for priority action but some areas for development, which are detailed below.
p.1
Borough Council children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising the incidence of child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff. I am grateful to you and your staff for your help and the time given during this inspection.
p.1
Borough Council children’s services
From the evidence gathered, the inspection identified a number of areas where the contact, referral and assessment arrangements were delivered satisfactorily in accordance with national guidance, in particular:
p.1
Borough Council children’s services
The management and prioritisation of contacts and referrals in respect of children considered to be in need of protection enables clear, timely decisions and actions. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk Communication and planning while undertaking child protection investigations are well supported by timely strategy discussions and meetings with the police.
p.1
Borough Council children’s services
Referring agencies have a clear understanding of thresholds for access to services based on Stockport’s Common Processes model. This enables appropriate contacts and referrals to be passed to the Customer Contact Centre.
p.2
Borough Council children’s services
Well trained and supported staff at the Customer Contact Centre offer a good range of advice and support to referring agencies and members of the public. All decisions about which contacts proceed to an assessment are taken by a qualified social worker.
p.2
Borough Council children’s services
Initial and core assessments seen were overall of satisfactory quality with some good examples containing clear analysis. All social workers spoken to by inspectors demonstrated a high level of skills in analysis and risk assessment often well beyond that evidenced in their written assessments.
p.2
Borough Council children’s services
Social workers receive regular supervision and value the overall support provided by their line managers, all of which contributes to maintaining a stable and committed workforce.
p.2
Borough Council children’s services
Information is passed appropriately between the daytime services and out of hours service to ensure continuity of provision for children and young people.
p.2
Borough Council children’s services
Senior managers collect and use performance data effectively to monitor the progress of social care work and other support work undertaken by schools and partner agencies.
p.2
Borough Council children’s services
From the evidence gathered, the following strengths and areas for development were also identified:
p.2
Strengths
Well established multi-agency partnerships enable the provision of a comprehensive range of support and preventative services. All agencies use Stockport’s Common Processes Model including Team Around the Child meetings. Social workers also provide preventative services directly through the Social Care in Partnership with Schools team.
p.2
Strengths
All staff and partner agencies benefit from a comprehensive range of training opportunities. Social workers place high value on the training offered and are able to demonstrate how they have used this to improve their practice.
p.2
Strengths
Good joint partnership staffing arrangements within the Early Intervention Team ensure effective communication between health and social care services, particularly when joint assessments take place in complex child protection cases.
p.2
Strengths
Good management systems in the duty and assessment services support staff well to prioritise and plan all incoming work.
p.3
Strengths
The Children with Disability team provides good quality, timely assessments of children and young people’s needs. Following assessment, a comprehensive range of services is available through the multi-agency Disability Partnership.
p.3
Areas for development
Social workers report that the current electronic system is slow and complex to use. Senior managers are considering a number of options to help improve both the electronic system and recording practices.
p.3
Areas for development
While all contacts where a child or young person may be at risk are dealt with promptly, some less urgent contacts received by the Early Intervention Team and which require further information to be gathered from other agencies prior to a decision being made, have been subject to delays.
p.3
Areas for development
There is delay in the provision of services for some children and young people assessed as requiring support from the Family Support Teams. Monitoring of their welfare, while awaiting support, does not consistently or robustly consider significant changes to family circumstances.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: John Schultz, Chief Executive, Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Andrew Webb, Chair of Stockport Safeguarding Children Board Mark Weldon, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Stockport Metropolitan Borough council Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion