Other · Local authority data pack
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The joint area review in 2008 judged safeguarding, provision for children and young people with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, and capacity to improve as inadequate. p.2
- One independent specialist college is good and two are inadequate, showing performance below similar areas and that found nationally. p.2
- Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 905
- shorter than usual (typical 3558)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 30, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Andy Roberts Strategic Director for Families Surrey County Council County Hall, Room 116 Penrhyn Road Kingston upon Thames Surrey KT1 2DJ
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Ofsted guidance published in May 2009 explained that the annual rating would derive from a new performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the council has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant Every Child Matters indicators in the new National Indicator Set (NIS).
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
In considering the evidence in the profile to determine the children’s services rating for 2009 it has become clear that the continuing gaps in the data are significant, particularly those relating to aspects of social care and services for Looked After Children. Ofsted has decided therefore to use 2009 as a transitional year easing into the full application of the new system in 2010. As a consequence, although the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s rating, we have interpreted the performance bands with flexibility and exercised professional judgement with caution.
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
The annual rating derives from a four point scale:
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, a rating of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6716 Direct F 020-7421-5715 juliet.winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Children’s services in Surrey County Council perform adequately.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
The joint area review in 2008 judged safeguarding, provision for children and young people with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, and capacity to improve as inadequate. Since then a recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment services discovered no areas for priority action in the small sample of provision seen. This shows some improvement from 2008 and children’s services are now adequate overall.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
The overall effectiveness of the very large majority of inspected services and settings is good or better. The large majority of primary schools are good or better and only a small minority are satisfactory. Achievement is well above the national average at Key Stage 2, although in line with similar areas, and more primary schools are meeting floor targets. An average proportion of secondary schools is good or better, although one-third are only satisfactory; none now fall short of national floor targets. Achievement at Key Stage 4 has improved to well above the national average and is in line with similar areas. A large majority of school sixth forms are good or better but a quarter are only satisfactory. Two general further education and tertiary providers are good and two are satisfactory, showing performance below similar areas and that found nationally. Four sixth form colleges are at least good but two
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
are satisfactory, also showing performance below similar areas and performance nationally. Average numbers are in education or training at age 17 when compared with similar areas and nationally. Very high achievement continues for qualifications at levels 2 and 3 by the age of 19, although in line with similar areas.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
For children, young people and others whose circumstances make them vulnerable, an above average proportion of special schools are good or better, although with some satisfactory provision. The large majority of pupil referral units are good or better but a quarter are satisfactory, resulting in performance above the national average but below similar areas. One independent specialist college is good and two are inadequate, showing performance below similar areas and that found nationally. An above average proportion of residential special schools are good or better.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Young children get a good start and achievement is well above national and similar area averages in the Early Years Foundation Stage. An above average proportion of nurseries, childcare settings and childminders are good or better. Very few nurseries are only satisfactory, although a quarter of childcare settings and childminders perform at this level. For looked after children, eight children’s homes are good or better but two are satisfactory, although performance is above similar areas and that found nationally. The fostering agency is good. For looked after children, achievement at Key Stage 2 is average against similar areas and achievement nationally and is improving. Performance against the very large majority of national indicators, including those for staying safe and enjoying and achieving, is at least in line with similar authorities and broadly in line with or better than national figures. The difference in the
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
performance of children and young people whose circumstances make them vulnerable and others of the same age is broadly in line with similar areas and the difference nationally. Gaps are reducing most noticeably in the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.3
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
The children’s services rating is provided for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. The rating of local authority children’s services will contribute significantly to the managing performance theme of each local authority’s Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) organisational assessment and therefore to the score for each local authority overall.
p.3
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, CAA
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion