Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Nicholas McMullen

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Nicholas McMullen

  • Postcode verified

    RM17 6SL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+22Mostly positivemore positive than 36% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivepositiveclearconsistentlyeffectivelyhigh qualitystrengthimproved
Criticismnot consistentlyat risknot alwaysnot sufficientlynot yetharmnot effectivenot accurate

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings683w+64
  • What needs to improve251w−75

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
934
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 28, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
21%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%What needs to improve 27%

Full report text

Ms Jo Olsson Director for Children, Education and Families Thurrock Council Civic Offices New Road Grays Essex RM17 6SL

p.1

services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Thurrock Council which was conducted on 9 and 10 November 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

services

The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements on 3 and 4 November 2009 have been addressed but have not all been fully resolved. There is not yet in place an effective protocol between partner agencies to screen and consider the most effective response to incidents of domestic abuse that are referred to the council. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

services

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Senior managers are visible and accessible to front line staff. This contributes to positive staff morale and gives senior managers a detailed awareness of operational issues. Managers also have a very positive approach to external scrutiny and challenge and have used this to enhance their understanding of the service, enabling them to appropriately use resources to improve the quality of services for children and their families.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Workforce development, including support provided for newly qualified social workers and the front line management development programme is of a high quality. Social work staff are provided with good opportunities for professional development.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Effective use is made by the council of a wide range of services provided by the voluntary sector aimed at a continuum of need and particularly those most vulnerable. These services, which include parenting programmes, therapeutic support for victims of child sexual abuse and intensive family support and counselling are highly valued by children and parents.

p.2

areas

ƒ Referrals are responded to promptly, at the point of inspection there were no unallocated cases and social workers had manageable workloads. Practice and procedures comply with statutory requirements and ensure children are protected.

p.2

areas

ƒ Children identified as suffering or at risk of harm receive an immediate response and child protection enquiries are carried out by qualified and suitably experienced social workers.

p.2

areas

ƒ Assessments, including those for disabled children, are clear and include some analysis. They are completed in a timely manner and gather appropriate information. Children are consistently seen and seen alone when required. Their perspectives and views are reflected clearly in the assessment process.

p.2

areas

ƒ Record keeping is up-to-date and decision making is clear and well recorded. This assists out-of-hours services and managers to respond effectively and safely if required to do so.

p.2

areas

ƒ Out-of-hours duty arrangements are clear, provide effective safeguarding and are well linked to daytime services.

p.2

areas

ƒ The high volume of re-referrals has been scrutinised by managers and levels are reducing so that they are now broadly in line with national averages. ƒ There are clear case transfer protocols between teams which are applied consistently and effectively and which enable cases to be safely transferred.

p.2

areas

ƒ Staff access relevant training and receive regular supervision which focuses both on issues of case management and professional development. Management oversight of cases is consistent and results in improved practice.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The recording of children’s ethnicity on case files is not always accurate or timely and case records do not sufficiently demonstrate that work is being undertaken by social workers to ensure that issues of diversity, equality and identity are fully addressed. Information on race, religion, language or culture is not consistently used to design and deliver service improvement.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Safeguarding thresholds are not consistently adhered to by all referring agencies resulting in some unnecessary referrals. Some cases being referred and responded to by social care could be appropriately managed through use of the common assessment framework and the provision of more broadly targeted services. Other cases, while appropriate for social care intervention, are sometimes escalated too readily into child protection processes leading to children and families being subject to inappropriate levels of intervention.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Referral information provided by partner agencies is not of a consistently good quality. This is particularly so in respect of notifications regarding incidents of domestic violence. There is no effective protocol in place between partner agencies to screen and consider the most effective response to incidents of domestic abuse.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Information from case audits is not systemically analysed and used to inform service improvement.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Graham Farrant, Chief Executive, Thurrock Council Amy Weir, Chair of Thurrock Safeguarding Children Board Charles Curtis, Lead Member for Children’s Social Care, Thurrock Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion