Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mary Varley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mary Varley

  • Postcode verified

    WS1 1TW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−47Criticalmore positive than 7% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveoutstandingtimelystrengthseffectivelypromptly
Criticismnot consistentlyrisk of harmweaknessespoorinconsistentinsufficientlydelaysincomplete

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings558w−5
  • What needs to improve233w−65

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
791
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 25, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%What needs to improve 29%

Full report text

Ms Pauline Pilkington Executive Director for Children’s Services Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council Room 39, The Council House Lichfield Street Walsall WS1 1TW

p.1

Council children’s services

This letter contains the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council which was conducted on 20 and 21 January 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to Ofsted’s annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services.

p.1

Council children’s services

The inspection identified no areas for priority action but some areas for development, which are detailed below.

p.1

Council children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising the incidence of child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers and other practitioners. I am grateful to you and your staff for your help and the time given during this inspection.

p.1

Council children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the inspection identified a number of areas where the contact, referral and assessment arrangements were delivered satisfactorily in accordance with national guidance, in particular:

p.1

Council children’s services

ƒ Initial decision making in respect of contacts and referrals is thorough. Children at immediate risk of harm are promptly recognised and timely protective action is taken. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 9456333 Direct F 0117 9456554 Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk ƒ Multi-agency screening and initial risk assessment in the domestic abuse response team ensure that focused action is taken to further assess risks to children.

p.1

Council children’s services

ƒ Local agencies recognise children’s needs for further assessment and make well-founded and usually timely referrals.

p.2

Council children’s services

ƒ Child protection enquiries and investigations are satisfactorily completed by qualified and experienced staff. This means that risks to children are identified and addressed.

p.2

Council children’s services

ƒ The work of the initial response team continues to be robustly audited by managers at all levels. The latest action plan appropriately addresses identified weaknesses.

p.2

Council children’s services

ƒ Staff receive regular and effective supervision from experienced managers. Decisions reached in supervision are routinely transferred to electronic records.

p.2

Council children’s services

ƒ The high proportion of newly-qualified social workers are suitably supported by additional supervision, protected caseloads and a programme of learning and development.

p.2

Council children’s services

ƒ The racial, cultural and religious needs of children are generally recognised and taken into account within assessments.

p.2

Council children’s services

ƒ Communication and information exchange between the day time services and the Emergency Response Service are well-established and are facilitated by a shared electronic recording system.

p.2

Council children’s services

ƒ Policy, operational procedures and protocols provide sound guidance for staff in carrying out assessments.

p.2

Council children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following strengths and areas for development were also identified:

p.2

Strengths

ƒ The electronic recording system effectively supports staff in undertaking their duties. It is easy to use, efficient and reliable. Staff receive good support and training to assist them making best use of the system. Improvements have been made as a result of feedback.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Good quality professional interpretation services are readily available and routinely used for a wide range of families for whom English is not their first language to ensure that information is comprehensively gathered.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ Not all initial assessment work is correctly categorised which means that the volume of such work is not accurately recognised and recorded.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ There are delays in completing a high proportion of initial assessments. Monitoring and prioritisation of this incomplete work are inconsistent and insufficiently rigorous. Senior managers took immediate steps to review all outstanding assessments and to strengthen monitoring arrangements.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The quality of written assessments is variable, with poor writing and limited analysis in some assessments. The contribution of other agencies is difficult to discern. Assessments do not consistently demonstrate that children’s wishes and feelings are taken into account.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Although effective action is taken to protect children, the records of strategy discussions do not consistently demonstrate the contribution of other agencies or that appropriate joint planning for child protection investigations is taking place.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ In two instances childminders were used inappropriately to provide overnight care for children. The council identified that these were isolated cases and gave an immediate undertaking that they would not be repeated.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The council’s policy to maximise the use of the common assessment framework to make referrals to children’s social care is yet to be fully embedded.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Paul Sheehan, Chief Executive, Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council Jane Evans, Chair of Walsall Safeguarding Children Board Councillor Rachel Walker, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Children, Schools and Families

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion