Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Hanslope Pre-School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Hanslope Pre-School Committee
- Group reference verified
RP906628
- Inspection date verified
21 Feb 2018
- Inspectors verified
Sarah Holley
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Inadequate
- Postcode verified
MK19 7NZ
- Name on report verified
Hanslope Pre-School
- URN verified
141808
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesInadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentInadequate
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The poor learning environment and the weaknesses in teaching lead to children becoming bored and some deterioration in their behaviour. p.3
- The provider has failed to notify Ofsted with the names of all committee members, as required. p.1
- The manager and staff have a poor understanding about how children learn and develop. p.3
- Although there have been opportunities for staff to develop their skills, such as through training, this has had little impact on the quality of teaching, which is weak. p.3
- Staff have low expectations of what children can do. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- implement rigorous recruitment procedures consistently to ensure the suitability of staff working with children 01/03/2018 p.2
- provide Ofsted with information about committee members to enable all suitability checks to be initiated 01/03/2018 p.2
- provide the manager with support and guidance to enable her to monitor and improve staff practice and teaching effectively, to provide children with good-quality learning experiences 01/04/2018 p.2
- improve assessments and planning to provide children with suitably challenging activities that target their individual needs and help them make good progress. 01/04/2018 p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Safeguarding2
“Safeguarding is ineffective.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 887
- about usual (typical 907)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Hanslope Pre-School Village Hall, Newport Road, Hanslope, Milton Keynes, MK19 7NZ
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 21 February 2018 8 May 2015
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This provision is inadequate
The provider does not always follow their own recruitment procedures. They have recruited some staff members without taking thorough steps to check their suitability. The provider has failed to notify Ofsted with the names of all committee members, as required. Therefore, Ofsted has not been able to initiate all suitability checks. The provider and manager fail to monitor staff practice and teaching effectively. Teaching is weak and staff consistently miss opportunities to engage with children and extend their learning. Children do not make the progress of which they are capable. Staff's assessments of children's progress are inconsistent and inaccurate. They do not plan well for children's individual needs, nor do they have high enough expectations of children's capabilities. Children become bored from the lack of challenge offered by the uninspiring learning environment and the activities that staff plan.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Staff help children to develop an interest in a healthy diet. For example, they provide them with nutritious snacks. Parents speak warmly of the staff. Staff regularly lend them resources, such as books, to enable them to help develop children's communication and literacy skills at home.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
implement rigorous recruitment procedures consistently to ensure the suitability of staff working with children 01/03/2018
p.2
Due Date
provide Ofsted with information about committee members to enable all suitability checks to be initiated 01/03/2018
p.2
Due Date
provide the manager with support and guidance to enable her to monitor and improve staff practice and teaching effectively, to provide children with good-quality learning experiences 01/04/2018
p.2
Due Date
improve assessments and planning to provide children with suitably challenging activities that target their individual needs and help them make good progress. 01/04/2018
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed children and staff indoors and outdoors. The inspector carried out a joint observation with the manager. The inspector spoke to staff about their understanding of child protection, safeguarding and first aid. The inspector spoke to parents and children and took account of their views. The inspector looked at a sample of documentation, including policies and children's records.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
Safeguarding is ineffective. The provider obtains the necessary Disclosure and Barring checks but does not complete other checks for some staff's suitability. In addition, the provider has not provided Ofsted with the changes to the committee to enable full suitability checks to be carried out. These omissions compromise children's welfare. However, the manager and staff have a suitable understanding of the steps to take to report any concerns about a child to keep them safe. They ensure that the premises are safe and secure when children are present. The provider and manager do not evaluate effectively. There have been significant deteriorations in the quality of teaching since the last inspection. The provider has not given the manager the support that she needs to fulfil the requirements of her role well. For example, the manager has not recognised that her own monitoring of children's progress is not accurate and that she is, therefore, not
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
able to support staff in their ongoing assessments of each child's learning. She does not provide staff with the support and feedback that they need to improve what they do. However, she does ensure she uses additional funding received to purchase resources that benefit individual children and they enjoy using.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
The manager and staff have a poor understanding about how children learn and develop. They do not manage their time well to prioritise helping children to engage in meaningful play and learning. For example, staff overly focus their time on administrative tasks or on children who choose to take part in structured learning experiences. Meanwhile other children wander around with little purpose. Although there have been opportunities for staff to develop their skills, such as through training, this has had little impact on the quality of teaching, which is weak. Staff have low expectations of what children can do. For example, they do not encourage older children to try to write their names, and they over-direct children during activities they plan with the aim of developing creativity. Staff limit the amount of time that children can spend outdoors because they do not recognise the value in outdoor learning. When children are outdoors, staff supervise them well but
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment is inadequate
stand and watch as children take part in activities that do not challenge them. For example, older children line up to jump off low blocks or go round and round on wheeled toys.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
The provider cannot ensure children's welfare due to the weaknesses in safeguarding practice. The poor learning environment and the weaknesses in teaching lead to children becoming bored and some deterioration in their behaviour. However, staff are quick to remind children about the rules of the setting to help them learn about right and wrong. Children do not develop independence skills or become inquisitive learners. Children are welcoming to visitors and are keen to talk to them and invite them to join in their play. Staff do encourage children to begin to meet their needs, such as by finding their coats or serving their snacks.
p.3
Outcomes for children are inadequate
Overall, children have a suitable set of skills ready for starting school. However, due to the weaknesses in teaching, much of this learning cannot be contributed to their experience at pre-school. Children learn about different countries and cultures to help their understanding of diversity. They learn to follow simple routines, such as gathering each morning for registration. However, the planned activities to teach children about numbers and letters do not have any meaningful impact on children developing mathematical or literacy skills. Children lack challenge, lose their curiosity to learn and wander aimlessly.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number 141808 Local authority Milton Keynes Inspection number 1089621 Type of provision Sessional provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register Age range of children 2 - 4 Total number of places 42 Number of children on roll 37 Name of registered person Hanslope Pre-School Committee
p.5
reference number
Date of previous inspection 8 May 2015 Telephone number 07977 721755
p.5
reference number
Hanslope Pre-School registered in 1996 and is situated in the village of Hanslope, near Milton Keynes. The pre-school is open Monday to Friday from 9.15am until 12.15pm, during term time only, and runs a lunch club between 12.15pm and 1.15pm. The provider is in receipt of funding for the provision of free early education to children aged two, three and four. There are six members of staff working with the children. The manger holds a qualification at level 5 and three other members of staff hold relevant qualifications at level 2 or level 3.
p.5
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.6
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion