Other · Local authority data pack
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
WN3 4HH
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The proportion of children’s homes which are good or better is less than in similar areas and national figures; there is also some inadequate provision. p.2
- Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. p.1
- There has been one serious case review since December 2008 which was evaluated as good. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment2
“The last annual performance assessment judged safeguarding as good.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 650
- shorter than usual (typical 3558)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 33, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Nick Hudson Director of Children and Young Peoples Services Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council Progress House Westwood Park Drive Wigan WN3 4HH
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Ofsted guidance published in May 2009 explained that the annual rating would derive from a new performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the council has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant Every Child Matters indicators in the new National Indicator Set (NIS).
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
In considering the evidence in the profile to determine the children’s services rating for 2009 it has become clear that the continuing gaps in the data are significant, particularly those relating to aspects of social care and services for Looked After Children. Ofsted has decided therefore to use 2009 as a transitional year easing into the full application of the new system in 2010. As a consequence, although the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s rating, we have interpreted the performance bands with flexibility and exercised professional judgement with caution.
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
The annual rating derives from a four point scale:
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, a rating of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6716 Direct F 020-7421-5715 juliet.winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Children’s services in Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council perform well.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
The overall effectiveness of schools and other settings is good. Over half of inspected services are good or better although there is too much provision which is just satisfactory. A higher proportion of primary and nursery schools are good or better and this is in line with the performance in similar areas. Childcare is satisfactory. Over half of secondary schools are good or better and the rest are satisfactory but this is below the national average. Provision post-16 is good as are the majority of special schools. The proportion of children’s homes which are good or better is less than in similar areas and national figures; there is also some inadequate provision. The local authority’s fostering and adoption services are good but arrangements for private fostering are unsatisfactory. The majority of judgements made under Every Child Matters are good or better, including those for staying safe and enjoying and achieving.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
There has been no inspection of safeguarding and looked after children’s services during this period. There has been one serious case review since December 2008 which was evaluated as good. The last annual performance assessment judged safeguarding as good.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Performance against the majority of national indicators, including those for staying safe and enjoying and achieving, is at least as good as and sometimes better than that found nationally and in similar areas. However, children from a minority ethnic background achieve less well at the end of primary school and at Key Stage 4 than their peers in similar areas. The gap at Key Stage 2 between the achievement of most children and those young people with special educational needs is slightly larger than in similar areas.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
The children’s services rating is provided for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. The rating of local authority children’s services will contribute significantly to the managing performance theme of each local authority’s Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) organisational assessment and therefore to the score for each local authority overall.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs well (3)
Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, CAA
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion