Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Helen Humphreys

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Helen Humphreys

  • Postcode verified

    WN3 4HH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+12Mostly positivemore positive than 31% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectivelytimelyvery highstrengthclearlyclearrobust
Criticismat riskseriousvariablepoornot sufficientlyharmlimitednot accurately

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings695w+71
  • What needs to improve266w−54

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
961
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 23, typical 45
Average sentence
26 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 72%What needs to improve 28%

Full report text

Mr Nick Hudson Director of Children and Young People’s Services Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council Progress House Westwood Park Drive Wigan WN3 4HH

p.1

arrangements within Wigan Metropolitan Borough children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council which was conducted on 27 and 28 October 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within Wigan Metropolitan Borough children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within Wigan Metropolitan Borough children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within Wigan Metropolitan Borough children’s services

The majority of areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in February 2010 have been addressed. However further work is on-going to improve the quality of analysis in core assessments and this remains an area for development.

p.1

arrangements within Wigan Metropolitan Borough children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Good partnership working between police, health and social care has significantly reduced the number of inappropriate domestic abuse referrals to Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

Strengths

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk children’s social care. This partnership strategy, endorsed by Wigan Safeguarding Children Board has resulted in more timely and effective safeguarding of children living in families with domestic abuse. ƒ The common assessment framework (CAF) is firmly established across the partnership with clearly agreed thresholds and good arrangements for co-ordination, monitoring and audit. This ensures that families receive good quality support from a range of agencies and has led to a significant reduction in the number of referrals to children’s services for family support and more effective targeting of social care resources.

p.1

following areas

ƒ Practice and procedures enable the management of risk and ensure good outcomes for children and young people. An experienced manager ensures effective prioritisation and timely decision making. Children suffering or at risk of harm are identified quickly and receive appropriate responses. ƒ Policies and procedures are readily accessible to staff and are known and used effectively. ƒ Strategy meetings are used effectively, include relevant agencies and are clearly recorded with appropriate action plans. Section 47 enquiries are thorough and timely and always carried out by a suitably qualified and experienced social worker. ƒ The council ensures that the majority of initial assessments are now completed within timescales. ƒ Initial assessments are clear, analytical and identify risk and protective factors. Conclusions and judgements about standards of care enable effective plans to be put in place. ƒ Children and family members are routinely involved in their initial assessments

p.2

following areas

and Section 47 enquiries, and their views and feelings are taken into account. ƒ Out-of-hours duty arrangements are clear, robust and linked well to the day referral service. ƒ Critically reflective supervision is provided for all staff and suitable training is available, including lessons from serious case reviews. This is contributing to improving practice. ƒ Staff in the referral and assessment team are suitably qualified and experienced and are supported by experienced managers.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff morale is good. Staff feel well supported by senior managers who are visible and accessible to them on a formal and informal basis for advice and guidance. ƒ The council have taken appropriate action to address most of the findings from the last unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements. Senior managers have developed a range of quality assurance and monitoring activities which have led to improvements in practice and to the identification of further training and development work.

p.2

Areas for development

ƒ The quality of core assessments remains variable. In some of these assessments the quality of analysis is poor and there is limited recording of children’s views. This was identified as an area for development at the last inspection. This is recognised by senior managers and plans are in place to rectify this issue including the commissioning of relevant training. ƒ The impact of culture, religion, linguistic needs and disability is not sufficiently explored in initial and core assessments or given proper consideration in individual plans. ƒ The Integrated Children’s System (ICS) is very cumbersome requiring staff to operate two systems. This is time consuming and takes time away from work with families. The performance data produced by ICS does not accurately capture actual performance on the completion of assessments by social work teams. ƒ Not all staff have an up-to-date appraisal to identify and meet development

p.3

Areas for development

and learning needs and address issues identified by performance management activity. ƒ Staff workloads are variable, and in some cases are too high. For example some experienced staff in the duty team are carrying very high case loads. Although this is not affecting the timely completion of work it does limit the opportunity for reflective practice and the entering of written assessments onto ICS.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Joyce Redfearn, Chief Executive, Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council Sue Woolmore, Chair of Wigan Safeguarding Children Board Sue Louden, Lead Member for Children’s Services, Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion