Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Simon Rushall
- Postcode verified
RG40 1WQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- While some examples of adequate and good assessments were seen, most are descriptive and lack sufficient analysis of need. p.3
- This was an area for development at the previous inspection. p.3
- While there is evidence of some progress, further development is needed to continue to improve outcomes for children and young people. p.3
- In particular discussions about the balance of risks, protective factors and needs are not always evident and in consequence the effectiveness of planning in individual cases cannot be identified. p.3
- The ethnicity of children and family members is not consistently recorded on case files. p.3
- Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area. p.3
- Copy: Susan Law, Chief Executive, Wokingham Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 829
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 28, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 7
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 18%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Andy Couldrick General Manager Children’s Services Wokingham Borough Council PO Box 156 Shute End Wokingham RG40 1WQ
p.1
arrangements within Wokingham Borough Council children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Wokingham Borough Council which was conducted on 15 and 16 March 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within Wokingham Borough Council children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
arrangements within Wokingham Borough Council children’s services
The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within Wokingham Borough Council children’s services
Some of the areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in September 2009 are met.
p.1
arrangements within Wokingham Borough Council children’s services
The areas of priority action identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in September 2009 are met.
p.1
arrangements within Wokingham Borough Council children’s services
From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
The council has implemented an effective workforce development strategy that Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
Strengths
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk has improved significantly the stability of the workforce. The recruitment of permanent social work staff and managers, a reduction in the use of agency staff, improved sickness absence levels and good access to relevant training opportunities ensure that services to children and their families are delivered in a timely way by highly motivated and well-trained staff with good management direction.
p.1
following areas
Referrals receive a prompt response with appropriate management oversight. Management decisions are clearly recorded in case files. Child protection procedures are understood and applied by staff and managers consistently to ensure the safety of children and young people.
p.2
following areas
Most assessments are completed in line with statutory timescales, ensuring that services are delivered in a timely way.
p.2
following areas
Section 47 enquiries are thorough and carried out by suitably qualified and experienced social workers. Children suffering or at risk of harm are identified and receive an appropriate response.
p.2
following areas
Inter-agency communication and working are mostly effective and thresholds are agreed and applied consistently. Use of the common assessment framework (CAF) is well-established across partner agencies, integrated within a thresholds framework and provides a wide range of preventive services.
p.2
following areas
Out-of-hours duty arrangements are clear and robust. All those undertaking child protection work are suitably qualified and experienced social workers who have access to the council’s electronic social care record system. This ensures that children and their families receive an appropriate response that is consistent with that provided by daytime services.
p.2
following areas
The council has recently implemented robust audit and performance management arrangements that enable managers at all levels to monitor and challenge casework and decision-making and to improve service delivery. However the full impact of these improvements is yet to be realised.
p.2
following areas
Social workers value regular supervision and report that it allows for critical reflection and challenge and supports effective delivery to safeguard and meet the needs of children and families.
p.2
following areas
Staff workloads are manageable and arrangements for the transfer of cases effective, enabling a timely response that safeguards children. There are no unallocated cases.
p.2
Areas for development
The quality of assessments remains too variable. While some examples of adequate and good assessments were seen, most are descriptive and lack sufficient analysis of need. This was an area for development at the previous inspection. While there is evidence of some progress, further development is needed to continue to improve outcomes for children and young people.
p.3
Areas for development
Some case recording does not include the activity and analysis that has taken place. In particular discussions about the balance of risks, protective factors and needs are not always evident and in consequence the effectiveness of planning in individual cases cannot be identified.
p.3
Areas for development
The views of children and their families are not consistently taken into account in assessments. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
The identity, ethnicity, religious and cultural needs of children and their families are not always considered in assessments. The ethnicity of children and family members is not consistently recorded on case files. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.
p.3
Areas for development
Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Susan Law, Chief Executive, Wokingham Borough Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion