Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Castle Homes Care Limited in Telford and Wrekin
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Castle Homes Care Ltd
- Inspection date verified
25 Jan 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Tina Maddison
- Helped and protected verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectivenesssingle source
Inadequate
- Name on report verified
SC020576
- URN verified
SC020576
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Helped and protectedInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (12,716 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Serious shortfalls in education and failings in the help and protection of children contribute to the inadequate judgement. p.6
- There are serious and/or widespread failures that mean children and young people are not protected or their welfare is not promoted or safeguarded. p.1
- It is [the young person’s] last year in education and they should be doing their GCSEs.’ A lack of consultation with key personnel by senior leaders within the organisation shows deficiencies in the leadership and management of the service. p.5
- The effectiveness of leaders and managers inadequate p.1
- This children’s home is inadequate because: p.1
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The quality and purpose of care standard requires the registered person to ensure that staff— provide personalised care that meets each child’s needs, as recorded in the child’s relevant plans, taking account of the child’s background. p.3
- In particular, assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child and take effective action when there is a serious concern about a child’s welfare. p.3
- The registered person must keep the statement of purpose under review and, where appropriate, revise it. p.4
- Restraint in relation to a child is only permitted for the purpose of preventing— injury to any person (including the child); serious damage to the property of any person (including the child). p.4
- Restraint in relation to a child must be necessary and proportionate. p.4
- Specifically, this is with regard to the locking of internal doors. 10/03/2018 p.4
- Ensure that children’s homes are nurturing and supportive environments that meet the needs of children. p.4
- For them to be so, they will, in most cases, be homely, domestic environment. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes9
“This poor practice compromises young people’s progress and experiences.” p.5
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 3,099
- longer than usual (typical 2286)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report children’s home: SC020576 1 SC020576 Registered provider: Castle Homes Care Ltd
p.1
Full inspection Inspected under the social care common inspection framework
p.1
Information about this children’s home
This children’s home is operated by a large national provider. It is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to five male young people who have emotional and/or behavioural difficulties.
p.1
Overall experiences and progress of
children and young people, taking into account
p.1
inadequate
How well children and young people are helped and protected inadequate
p.1
inadequate
The effectiveness of leaders and managers inadequate
p.1
inadequate
There are serious and/or widespread failures that mean children and young people are not protected or their welfare is not promoted or safeguarded.
p.1
inadequate
Overall judgement at last inspection: sustained effectiveness
p.1
inadequate
Enforcement action since last inspection: none
p.1
Key findings from this inspection
This children’s home is inadequate because:
p.1
Key findings from this inspection
The arrangements for young people’s education are inadequate. Decision-making about young people’s education indicates serious failings in Inspection report children’s home: SC020576 2 leadership and management within the organisation. The staff fail to effectively de-escalate incidents involving the young people. Restraint practice is not always proportionate and safely managed. The staff use restrictive practices which limit young people’s access to parts of the home. For example, internal doors downstairs are locked at night. The reasons for this are not fully known or reviewed by staff. Managers and staff do not make sure that risk assessments and placement plans reflect young people’s individual needs and circumstances. Young people do not understand why some rules and boundaries are not consistently applied. Some areas of the home have an institutional appearance. When young people return after being missing from home, they do not always
p.1
Key findings from this inspection
have access to an interview with someone independent of the home. The home’s statement of purpose is not up to date and does not accurately describe the children’s education arrangements.
p.2
Key findings from this inspection
Staff support young people’s emotional and physical health needs well. Young people make some good progress in relation to their starting points. Young people enjoy a wide range of activities in the community. Managers make good matching decisions and thoroughly consider the compatibility of new young people with those already living at the home.
p.2
Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement
02/03/2017 Interim Sustained effectiveness 12/10/2016 Full Good 11/02/2016 Interim Improved effectiveness 24/09/2015 Full Good Inspection report children’s home: SC020576 3
p.2
Statutory requirements
This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.
p.3
Requirement Due date
The quality and purpose of care standard requires the registered person to ensure that staff— provide personalised care that meets each child’s needs, as recorded in the child’s relevant plans, taking account of the child’s background. (Regulation 6(2)(b)(iv)) 10/03/2018
p.3
Requirement Due date
The education standard is that children make measurable progress towards achieving their educational potential and are helped to do so.
p.3
Requirement Due date
In particular, ensure that staff— maintain regular contact with each child’s education and training provider, including engaging with the provider and the placing authority to support the child’s education and training and to maximise the child’s achievement; help a child who is excluded from school, or who is of compulsory school age but not attending school, to access educational and training support throughout the period of non- attendance and to return to school as soon as possible. (Regulation 8 (1)(vi)(viii)) 10/3/2018
p.3
Requirement Due date
The positive relationships standard is that children are helped to develop, and to benefit from, relationships based on mutual respect and trust.
p.3
Requirement Due date
In particular, the standard in paragraph (1) requires the registered manager to ensure that staff— de-escalate confrontations with or between children, or potentially violent behaviour by children. (Regulation 11 (1)(2)(xi)) 10/03/2018
p.3
Requirement Due date
The protection of children standard is that children are protected from harm and enabled to keep themselves safe.
p.3
Requirement Due date
In particular, assess whether each child is at risk of harm, taking into account information in the child’s relevant plans, and, if necessary, make arrangements to reduce the risk of any harm to the child and take effective action when there is a serious concern about a child’s welfare. (Regulation 12 (2(a)(i)(vi)) 10/03/2018 Inspection report children’s home: SC020576 4 The leadership and management standard is that the registered person enables, inspires and leads a culture in the children’s home that helps children aspire to fulfil their potential and promotes their welfare. (Regulation 13 (1)(a)(b)) 10/03/2018
p.3
Requirement Due date
The registered person must keep the statement of purpose under review and, where appropriate, revise it. (Regulation 16 (3)(a)) 10/03/2018
p.4
Requirement Due date
Restraint in relation to a child is only permitted for the purpose of preventing— injury to any person (including the child); serious damage to the property of any person (including the child). Restraint in relation to a child must be necessary and proportionate. (Regulation 20 (1)(a)(b)(2)) 10/03/2018
p.4
Requirement Due date
The registered person must ensure that— children can access all appropriate areas of the children’s home premises; and any limitation placed on a child’s access to any part of the home’s premises— is intended to safeguard each child accommodated in the home; is necessary and proportionate; is kept under review and, if necessary, revised; and allows children as much freedom as possible when balanced against the need to keep them safe. (Regulation 21 (b)(c)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv))
p.4
Requirement Due date
Specifically, this is with regard to the locking of internal doors. 10/03/2018
p.4
Recommendations
Ensure that children’s homes are nurturing and supportive environments that meet the needs of children. For them to be so, they will, in most cases, be homely, domestic environment. Children’s homes must comply with relevant health and safety legislations (alarms, food hygiene,); however in doing so, homes should seek as far as possible to maintain a domestic rather than ‘institutional’ impression. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 15, paragraph 3.9)
p.4
Recommendations
Ensure that when a child returns to the home after being missing from care or away from the home without permission, the responsible local authority must provide an opportunity for the child to have an independent return to home interview. Homes should take account of information provided by such interviews when assessing risks and putting arrangements in place to protect each child. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 45, paragraph 9.30) Inspection report children’s home: SC020576 5
p.4
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate
Arrangements for young people’s education are poor. None of the three school-aged young people attend school or receive full-time education. Placing authorities identified this home as suitable to meet the young people’s needs because it offered young people education at the school operated by the provider. For reasons that are not clear, the school was de-registered at the end of the summer term 2017. Senior leaders within the organisation made this decision without sufficient planning and consideration for what the alternative education arrangements would be. This poor practice compromises young people’s progress and experiences.
p.5
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate
The manager and the placing authorities were not consulted by the provider prior to the closure of the school. One social worker commented, ‘I had no idea the school was closing… The children haven’t been given any consideration in this decision.’ Another social worker said, ‘It’s not good enough. It is [the young person’s] last year in education and they should be doing their GCSEs.’ A lack of consultation with key personnel by senior leaders within the organisation shows deficiencies in the leadership and management of the service. These weaknesses had a significant impact on young people’s learning opportunities.
p.5
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate
During the autumn term, the young people continued to receive education for 20 hours a week at an unregistered school. The young people now receive education at home from a qualified teacher each morning. Young people receive education in the open-plan kitchen and dining area of the home. Two housekeepers carry out their duties around the young people who are trying to receive education. This arrangement does not provide a satisfactory learning environment. Furthermore, the home is not registered as a school.
p.5
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate
On most afternoons, no educational activity takes place and the young people play on games consoles. The lack of adequate education has a significant impact on young people’s learning. Two of the young people are in their GCSE year, and so the loss of education is having a particularly serious impact on their ability to gain qualifications.
p.5
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate
Young people’s care plans do not contain clear aims and objectives for each young person. Plans are not targeted and do not detail the steps the young people need to take to earn trust and maximise their independence. This does not fully support young people’s progress.
p.5
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate
Managers and staff do not sufficiently explain to young people why rules and boundaries are different at the home compared to when they go to visit their family. For example, when one young person visits his family he has a mobile phone and is allowed out into the community on his own. However, he is not allowed to have a mobile phone at the home or to go out into the community unaccompanied. The young person said, ‘It is silly, that at home I can go out on my own and have a phone, but when I am here, I can’t go out or have a phone.’ This inconsistency does not support the young person’s Inspection report children’s home: SC020576 6 understanding about their care plan. Furthermore, this inconsistent practice does not help young people to enjoy age-appropriate freedoms safely.
p.5
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate
One young person, who will shortly be leaving the home, is on a transition programme. The social worker said, ‘This is a bit late in the day. I had to nudge them [the staff] to start helping him to become more independent, like going out on his own.’ Following the intervention from the local authority, this young person is now making good progress with building his independence skills. He is now going out of the home on his own, is preparing and cooking meals and applying for apprenticeships.
p.6
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate
The young people enjoy a wide range of activities, including Scouts, bowling, go-karting and visits to the cinema. As a result, young people have positive leisure experiences, enabling them to develop social skills and build confidence.
p.6
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate
Staff meet young people’s health needs well. The staff have supported one young person to receive the medication he needs, which has had a positive impact on his behaviour. The young people benefit from regular therapeutic sessions with a suitably qualified therapist. The therapist provides strategies for the staff to follow, which supports young people. Workshops take place three times a week for the young people as part of their therapeutic programme. The staff discuss topics with young people, for example sexual health care, the dangers of smoking and taking drugs.
p.6
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate
Young people do make some good progress. For example, incidents of self-injurious behaviour have reduced, and young people understand that their general well-being has improved. One young person said, ‘I have learned good skills here, I have learned a lot. I have got better at not being angry and at saying my feelings and thoughts.’
p.6
Overall experiences and progress of children and young people: inadequate
Serious shortfalls in education and failings in the help and protection of children contribute to the inadequate judgement.
p.6
How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate
Physical intervention records do not contain sufficient detail about what strategies the staff use to stop potentially challenging situations from escalating. As a result, the manager cannot fully assess whether the incident could have been avoided or whether alternative actions could have been taken. Young people told the inspector that not all staff are consistent in their approach. They said that although some staff give young people the chance to calm down others do not. One young person said, ‘Staff aren’t really consistent. Some are more lenient than others.’ There have been incidents in which the young people have caused damage to the home and assaulted the staff. Another young person said, ‘The staff aren’t good at calming me down.’ As a result, young people do not receive consistent support at challenging times. This does not help them to manage aspects of their behaviour appropriately.
p.6
How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate
Trained staff use front ground restraint techniques, which involve staff holding a young person face down on the floor. This has happened on three occasions. On one occasion, Inspection report children’s home: SC020576 7 the young person felt dizzy, vomited and needed hospital treatment following a ground hold restraint. On another occasion, the same young person was taken to hospital following a ground restraint and was found to have a graze on their shoulder and a mark on their head. The review of restraint incidents does not consider whether other action could have been taken to avoid the use of this technique.
p.6
How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate
Managers do not ensure that young people who witness a restraint receive a debrief by someone independent of the incident. As a result, young people do not have the opportunity to seek reassurance about what happened or raise concerns. One young person said, ‘I don’t understand why three or four adults need to jump on one kid.’ This inspection found that incidents of physical intervention have reduced. Nevertheless, when restraint incidents happen, they are not always managed proportionately or safely.
p.7
How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate
The staff manage young people’s behaviour through restrictive practices. Internal doors are locked at night. The reasons for this are not clear, and this practice is not risk assessed. The inspector found that some of these doors had not been opened promptly in the morning. Locking internal doors imposes external controls on young people and does not allow them access to appropriate areas of their home.
p.7
How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate
Risk assessments are not individualised. For example, none of the young people are allowed to use aerosol deodorants or have use of the internet in the home. Three young people are not allowed to have mobile phones or free time out of the home without the staff being with them. Blanket rules do not ensure that young people receive personalised care. Restrictive practice that is not sufficiently risk assessed and reviewed is an infringement of young people’s rights. Furthermore, it means that young people do not receive the right support to help them to learn how to manage their behaviour safely.
p.7
How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate
Young people do not often go missing from the home. When they do, staff take steps to locate them and return them quickly and safely. After one incident of going missing, young people did not have a return interview with someone independent of the home. This does not help staff to gather information that may be useful in safeguarding young people. Furthermore, it is not clear what arrangements are in place to facilitate independent return home interviews for those young people who live a long way from their family home.
p.7
How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate
All of the young people could identify a member of staff they could speak with if they felt unsafe or worried. There are no incidents of bullying in the home.
p.7
How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate
Staff use incentives and praise to reward and encourage positive behaviour. Young people have individual targets and can earn money when they do things well. Young people said that this is an effective way to help them behave well and that they like earning money. The registered manager monitors the effectiveness of sanctions and rewards.
p.7
How well children and young people are helped and protected: inadequate
The registered manager ensures that only suitable people are employed at the home. Inspection report children’s home: SC020576 8 Prospective staff are requested to pass comprehensive checks and reference requests to evidence their suitability.
p.7
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Senior leaders in the organisation made the decision to close the educational provision linked to the home. This was done without fully consulting the manager or placing authorities. Although the manager made repeated efforts to challenge this decision, her challenge was not effective. The decision to close the school, and the manner in which this decision was made, indicate serious failings in the organisation’s leadership. These failings are having a significant impact on young people’s educational progress and experiences.
p.8
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Managers and staff have made some improvements to the home environment. The lounge has recently been redecorated, and photos on display show some of the positive experiences that children have enjoyed. However, some areas of the home continue to have an institutional feel. For example, there are an excessive number of signs and noticeboards on display around the home. The upstairs landing contains a large mirror on the ceiling so that the waking night staff can see if a young person comes out of their room. This measure is in place despite other risk-reduction strategies, such as bedroom door alarms and the presence of waking night staff. The use of the mirror has not been reviewed by the manager to assess whether this continues to be necessary. Furthermore, the staff sometimes use institutional language, such as referring to the landing as ‘the landing zone’ and to the home as a ‘unit’ and ‘on and off-site’. When
p.8
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
combined, these issues influence how young people feel about their home. One young person said, ‘This is not a normal house… it doesn’t look like a normal house.’
p.8
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
Young people’s routines do not reflect their age and stage of development. Young people said that some rules are fair, but others are not. For example, young people are expected to be in their bedrooms at 10pm, despite one young person being almost 18 years old. When the inspector asked about this, the registered manager said, ‘This is the time that staff go off shift.’ A young person said, ‘To have to go to my room at 10pm is far too early at my age.’ Decisions about day-to-day routines are not child-led, and young people are not fully consulted about all aspects of their day-to-day lives.
p.8
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
The manager has completed a development plan for the home. It outlines how the home will meet regulations but does not contain details about how the home will continue to develop the quality of care, how the young people will be involved in this and in what timescales improvements will be achieved. The strengths and areas for improvement in the home are not detailed, and there is no evidence of learning from incidents that have happened.
p.8
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
The statement of purpose for the home contains inaccuracies and is not up to date. It states that education is provided at the school operated by the provider. This is no longer correct. Inspection report children’s home: SC020576 9 There is a stable and consistent staff team in place at the home. Staff turnover is very low. The experienced and qualified registered manager is supported by a deputy manager, who takes charge of the home in her absence. The staff commented positively on the support they receive from the managers and confirmed that they receive regular, good-quality supervision and training.
p.8
The effectiveness of leaders and managers: inadequate
The manager carefully assesses the impact of a new young person on the young people already living at the home. The young people are kept fully informed if a new young person is arriving at the home. If possible, the young person visits the home prior to their admission and the staff give them a written guide to the home. The young people are well matched and get on well.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: SC020576 10
p.9
Children’s home details
Registered provider: Castle Homes Care Ltd
p.10
Children’s home details
Registered provider address: 80 Hammersmith Road, London W14 8UD
p.10
Inspector
Tina Maddison, social care inspector Inspection report children’s home: SC020576 11 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.10
Inspector
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspector
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspector
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion