Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Morecambe Road School

Inspected 1 Feb 2018 · published 9 Mar 2018 · URN 119876

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    1 Feb 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Selby

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    LA3 3AB

  • Name on report verified

    Morecambe Road School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 23% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivesuccessfulsuccessfullyvery wellconsistentlyrapid progresshigh expectationsclear
Criticismseriouspoorinsufficientgapslow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1412w+50
  • What needs to improve96w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,499
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Paul Edmondson Headteacher Morecambe Road School Morecambe Road Morecambe Lancashire LA3 3AB

p.1

Short inspection of Morecambe Road School

Following my visit to the school on 1 February 2018 with Jane Holmes, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in January 2013.

p.1

Short inspection of Morecambe Road School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. There have been a number of recent changes including to leadership and to the school premises, but you and other leaders have ensured that these have led to better provision for pupils. Such improvements include the school now having a better-thought-out area for key stage 4 pupils, a new computer room and specialist rooms to provide pupils with sensory experiences and the opportunity to immerse themselves in projected pictures and sound. The school site recently suffered flooding and this caused damage to the school’s heating system. The repairs to this system have been organised so the smallest possible risk or inconvenience to pupils is being caused.

p.1

Short inspection of Morecambe Road School

The school is welcoming and friendly. Pupils work hard and behave well. Pupils were keen to talk to inspectors, even if they sometimes found this quite challenging. You have created a culture where staff are expected to provide the best possible experience for pupils. Leaders, teachers, teaching assistants and other members of staff know pupils and their needs well. They aim to find the best ways to meet these needs and do so successfully. This ensures that pupils gain in their learning and are very well cared for.

p.1

Short inspection of Morecambe Road School

You and other leaders are honest and open in your evaluation of the school. Your accurate identification of the school’s strengths helps you to build these further. In addition, your systematic development planning sets a clear framework for the continuing improvement to the school. Governors play a key role in making sure that different subject areas are as effective as possible through their well- established subject review programme.

p.1

Short inspection of Morecambe Road School

At the previous inspection, inspectors asked the school to improve teaching, including by raising teachers’ expectations. This was to ensure that pupils, including the most able in the secondary school, made as much progress as possible. You have introduced a different approach to how pupil groups are organised. Pupils of different ages within a key stage now work together. This allows you to better match these groups to pupils’ abilities and starting points. In addition, teachers and teaching assistants work closely together to make sure that their teaching challenges individual pupils. The successful teaching helps pupils to gain a range of accredited qualifications which confirm their achievement as they move from the school at the end of Year 11.

p.2

Short inspection of Morecambe Road School

One aspect of the effective teaching is the way in which teachers are expected to make the best use of their own particular skills and experience to shape how they teach. However, this sometimes leads to differences which make it harder for others to judge whether teaching and learning is consistently as effective as possible. The school’s assessment system helps staff to know how well pupils are learning. It gives them useful information to help staff to adjust their teaching if any pupil’s learning slows. However, more could be done to make sure that expectations become even higher by comparing the standards this system tracks with those found in other similar schools.

p.2

Short inspection of Morecambe Road School

The parents inspectors talked to, and those who shared their views in other ways, were generally very complimentary about the school and its work. A group of parents identified how key aspects, including the school giving their children the skills they need, the approachability of all members of staff and children wanting to be at school, make the school ‘fantastic’.

p.2

Short inspection of Morecambe Road School

Leaders and governors make sure that the arrangements for safeguarding pupils are comprehensive and effective. Staff pay close attention to detail in the records they keep about safeguarding. The systems in place to protect pupils are very carefully applied. For example, visitors to the school are checked thoroughly. On the day of the inspection, two unexpected visitors were not allowed to enter the school because they did not have sufficient information to confirm that they were no risk to pupils. The school provides helpful information about safeguarding on its website and in a clear leaflet for anyone who visits the school.

p.2

Short inspection of Morecambe Road School

Training about safeguarding is regular and gives staff the knowledge and confidence to deal with any issues, should these arise.

p.2

Short inspection of Morecambe Road School

The school site is secure. This security has recently been enhanced with the installation of electronically locking gates to give access to the school site. Pupils said that they feel safe. They told inspectors about a number of things which make them feel happy about their safety. These included aspects as diverse as the new fences around their play areas which make sure that they cannot mistakenly run in front of traffic, and the way that adults will sort out any issues that worry them.

p.2

Inspection findings

 The improvement in the school indicates that leaders have the skills and experience to ensure that this continues. You recognise that all members of staff are able to contribute to leadership and are successful in developing this potential. For example, you support non-teaching members of staff to become teachers. In addition, the school uses training programmes about leadership to enhance middle and senior leaders’ skills. You have extended the role of middle leaders by involving them more fully in planning how to improve the school.  Governance of the school has been restructured to allow for a better match of governors’ skills to the school’s needs. Governors are thoughtful and provide challenge to leaders through their probing questions about the school’s work. If they find that they have insufficient information to help them to understand how well an aspect of the school is performing, they are not afraid to ask leaders to

p.3

Inspection findings

provide the additional detail they need.  Pupils make good progress, including children in the early years. Pupils’ low starting points frequently mean that their gains are not identified in a fully meaningful way in the nationally published data on school performance. However, in 2017, pupils in Year 6 made progress at a similar rate to those in other schools in reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils in Year 11 successfully complete a number of external qualifications, including in English, mathematics and other subjects, such as history and life skills. Where appropriate, pupils enter GCSE examinations in some subjects. In addition, pupils are successful in BTEC awards including in health and beauty, and science. The school also provides pupils with opportunities to demonstrate that their wider skills have developed. In recent years, by the time they leave the school, almost all pupils have been

p.3

Inspection findings

successful in the bronze Duke of Edinburgh’s Award.  Teaching responds well to pupils’ particular needs. If there are gaps in pupils’ academic or wider learning, staff ensure that additional teaching is provided. Teachers and teaching assistants form close teams where responsibility for helping different groups of pupils is clear. This approach allows staff to tightly target their teaching to support individual pupils’ learning. This ensures that pupils make rapid progress. When needed, the school makes sure that pupils have the support and technological equipment they need to help them communicate. The curriculum in the school has a good balance between different subjects. Pupils enjoy the range of subjects provided and this helps them to engage with the activities provided. However, occasionally, whole-class teaching that involves some pupils less fully means that they become less interested.  Pupils behave well and their behaviour is managed well by staff. Pupils know

p.3

Inspection findings

about the school’s high expectations. They receive helpful advice about matters such as bullying and staying safe online. Teachers reinforce this advice as part of pupils’ everyday learning. The number of significant incidents of poor behaviour is very small and has reduced over time. Staff receive regular training about how to make serious misbehaviour less likely. They are also trained about when it is appropriate to use physical contact with a pupil in response to serious misbehaviour and how this can be done safely. Leaders ensure that any such instances are properly recorded and then followed up in detail in order to reduce the chance of a similar problem in the future.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 the school’s assessment system is further developed, including in how leaders and teachers cross-check the standards it defines against those in other, similar, schools  approaches to teaching and learning in the school are used consistently so that it is easier to ensure that all groups of pupils make the fastest possible progress.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Lancashire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During this inspection, we met with you and other senior leaders to discuss the school’s effectiveness. One of us had a discussion with the chair and other members of the governing body. One of us had a telephone conversation with a representative of the local authority. We met with a group of pupils and saw others around the school during lessons and breaks. One of us met with a group of members of staff other than senior leaders. One of us toured the school with you. We observed teaching and learning in classes across the school. We scrutinised a sample of pupils’ books and other work. We examined documents including information about the safeguarding of pupils, the school’s self-evaluation document, the development plan, records concerning teaching and learning, and information about pupils’ achievement. We considered 12 responses completed this school year to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire, including two additional written

p.4

Information about the inspection

responses. We met with parents and received further information from a phone call to Ofsted from a parent. We also considered comments made by parents in a school survey completed early this school year. We reviewed 16 responses from members of staff to their online questionnaire and 22 responses from pupils to a similar questionnaire.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion