Schools & FE · Short school inspection
The St Michael's Church of England Primary School, Thorpe on the Hill
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
6 Feb 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Jayne Ashman
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
LN6 9BN
- Name on report verified
The St Michael’s Church of England Primary School, Thorpe on the Hill
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The governor with oversight of the impact of the pupil premium spending has an excellent grasp of the issues and works well with you in order to ensure that the additional help that disadvantaged pupils receive makes the difference needed. p.2
- Yours is a positive and nurturing school. p.2
- This positive step will help them to oversee pupils’ progress effectively. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Staff development2
“Staff training is regular and appropriate.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,271
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Naomi Weaver Headteacher The St Michael’s Church of England Primary School, Thorpe on the Hill School Lane Thorpe-on-the-Hill Lincoln LN6 9BN
p.1
Thorpe on the Hill
Following my visit to the school on 6 February 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in March 2014.
p.1
Thorpe on the Hill
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You have a clear understanding of the strengths of your school and the areas that require further development. The senior leadership team has shown that it is effective in improving the school. The governing body performs its strategic roles well and holds you firmly to account for pupils’ achievement, particularly for that of the most disadvantaged. All leaders are determined to support their philosophy that every child meets their full potential and can be the best that they can be.
p.1
Thorpe on the Hill
Pupils have access to a full range of exciting experiences in order to stimulate their interests, deepen their knowledge and develop their thirst for learning. Pupils are involved in outdoor learning, drama and the arts. They visit places of historical and social interest. Leaders take seriously the importance of educating the ‘whole child’. Pupils said that they appreciate the opportunities that they receive. They also said how proud they are to attend the school, and that their teachers value their opinions, challenge and help them without doing the work for them.
p.1
Thorpe on the Hill
Many parents and carers were keen to inform the inspector about how happy their child is and how much progress they make in their lessons. They particularly appreciate the expertise of the teachers and the many ways they are invited to be involved in the life of the school, including learning alongside their child. The vast majority of parents who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, believe that their child is taught well and makes good progress, and they would recommend your school to others.
p.1
Thorpe on the Hill
You explained to me that, since the previous inspection, there had been a period of turbulence for the school. This was a difficult time. It is clear that leaders’ actions have been effective. The school community is upbeat, the profile of teaching is strong and the majority of pupils are attaining at levels above the national average in many of the subjects that they study.
p.2
Thorpe on the Hill
You recognise that a greater proportion of pupils, particularly the most able and the disadvantaged, need to achieve at a greater depth, particularly at the end of key stage 2. Together we reviewed the actions in place. Teachers now use a range of strategies to help the most able pupils further develop their language and reasoning skills, including involvement in philosophical debate. Pupils receive daily opportunities to apply their mathematical skills to challenging problems. They are presented with a number of opportunities to develop their independent and extended writing. Although improving, not enough pupils are achieving at the higher levels, particularly in writing. You recognise that the pace of this improvement needs to accelerate.
p.2
Thorpe on the Hill
You have conducted a close review of precisely why pupils, and particularly the most able pupils, are not yet making rapid progress in writing. Your conclusions are accurate. Pupils’ progress through school is sometimes slowed because their skills and knowledge are not appropriately built on. You have introduced a new whole- school approach to writing. This new approach focuses on systematically building pupils’ understanding of the skills of writing, including the understanding of grammar, accurate spelling and the effective editing of their own work. More attention is now paid to ensure that pupils have the skills needed to move successfully to the next stage in their writing development.
p.2
Thorpe on the Hill
The proportion of pupils eligible for the pupil premium is much smaller than the national average. The vast majority of this pupil group are achieving as their starting points indicate they should. The governor with oversight of the impact of the pupil premium spending has an excellent grasp of the issues and works well with you in order to ensure that the additional help that disadvantaged pupils receive makes the difference needed. Leaders and governors are committed to ensuring that the most able disadvantaged pupils achieve as they should. This is your intended next step.
p.2
Thorpe on the Hill
You place a high priority on protecting all pupils. Yours is a positive and nurturing school. On the day of the inspection, parents were working alongside their children to learn about keeping safe when using the computer and other forms of social media. Together, they were learning about the many challenges of using new technologies appropriately and how to keep safe from harm. Parents said that they valued the range of opportunities, such as this, to be involved and to learn. Arrangements to safeguard pupils’ welfare and safety are robust. Staff training is regular and appropriate. Actions to support the most vulnerable pupils take place in a timely manner. Pupils learn about a range of ways in which to keep themselves safe and healthy, including relationship education and ways in which they can eat healthily and enjoy exercise outdoors. Pupils said they feel that their school is a ‘family’ in which they are safe and happy.
p.2
Inspection findings
Governors provide effective support. They have a firm grasp on the strengths of the school and the areas for further improvement. They offer appropriate challenge to leaders. They have recognised the need to develop their expertise and are currently undergoing training to better understand assessment data. This positive step will help them to oversee pupils’ progress effectively. School improvement planning is robust, is focused and has appropriate milestones for when actions should be completed. Leaders’ self-evaluation is accurate. Leaders accept that, previously, there had been too much focus on attainment and not enough attention on pupils’ progress, particularly in lower key stage 2. Their attention is now rightly on accelerating pupils’ progress, particularly of the most able pupils who are in the majority in this school. Leaders often go the ‘extra mile’. For example, parents were keen to say how
p.3
Inspection findings
much they valued the wide-ranging efforts taken to set parents’ minds at rest during a recent school trip to London. Some parents, however, still believe that aspects of leaders’ communication could further improve. You told me that in this rural community a small school can often feel isolated. You value the partnerships with local schools and have evidence of the impact of these. For example, teachers’ assessments at each key stage and in the early years have been judged as accurate. You rightly recognise the need for high- quality school improvement partnerships in order to support the continuing success of the school.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that they:
p.3
Next steps for the school
continue the work to ensure that a greater proportion of pupils achieve at a greater depth at the end of key stage 2 continue the work to ensure that pupils learn the skills needed to write confidently and independently at the level their starting points indicate they should continue to work with parents in order to further communicate the actions that take place to support pupils’ progress and well-being ensure that leaders’ capacity is further enhanced by high-quality school improvement partnerships and support. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Lincoln, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Lincolnshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
I met with you, your senior leadership team and members of the governing body, including the chair and vice-chair. I met with a group of Year 6 pupils and spoke with parents early in the school day. I considered the views of the 74 parents posted on Parent View. There were no responses to the pupils’ survey or the staff survey. We conducted a scrutiny of Year 6 pupils’ work across a range of subjects studied. We also reviewed the work of selected pupils in Years 2, 4 and 5. I evaluated a range of documents, including leaders’ self-evaluation, development planning, safeguarding records and policies.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion