Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Oakhill Church School

Inspected 8 Feb 2018 · URN 141800

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    8 Feb 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Iain Freeland

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BA3 5AQ

  • Name on report verified

    Oakhill Church School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+30Mostly positivemore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongeffectiveengagingmake good progressenthusiasticeffectivelysuccessfulconfident
Criticismfall behindinconsistentconcernsnot strongharmnot yetnot confidentbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1118w+34
  • What needs to improve130w−11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,229
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 9%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Bethan Foister Headteacher Oakhill Church School Oakhill Radstock Somerset BA3 5AQ

p.1

Short inspection of Oakhill Church School

Following my visit to the school on 8 February 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since your predecessor school was judged to be good in September 2014.

p.1

Short inspection of Oakhill Church School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection of the predecessor school. The school became an academy in March 2015 and joined Bath and Wells Multi-Academy Trust (the trust). This has enhanced your ability to share your experiences across the trust’s schools and provide staff with a wide range of training and leadership coaching.

p.1

Short inspection of Oakhill Church School

There have been a number of staffing changes since the school became an academy, including the appointment of a new deputy headteacher. Two teachers have joined the school. In 2017, you were seconded to another school in the trust and your deputy headteacher, supported by trust leaders, oversaw the school’s work. The change in leadership provided some challenges. Parents and carers comment on poorer communication at this time. You are working to remedy this, although you, and the trust, recognise there is more to do.

p.1

Short inspection of Oakhill Church School

Pupils are enthusiastic about their learning. They comment on the range of subjects that they cover and the opportunities that are provided to explore their understanding. For example, Year 5 pupils were conscientiously conducting scientific experiments to understand how and why solids dissolve. Younger pupils were particularly keen to explain their knowledge of the animals of the African savannah. Safeguarding is effective.

p.1

Short inspection of Oakhill Church School

Staff are suitably trained and alert to the indicators of harm. Training and briefings from the trust’s safeguarding leader are particularly helpful in keeping staff up to date with the specific risks that are being seen in the local area.

p.2

Short inspection of Oakhill Church School

Leaders are swift to take action when children or their families need protection. The school makes good use of ‘early help’ to ensure that those families who need help receive it. The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and records are well maintained.

p.2

Short inspection of Oakhill Church School

Pupils are safe. Pupils and the majority of parents who responded to Parent View report the school to be a safe place. However, a few parents are concerned about bullying and how well it is dealt with. A small number of parents are also concerned that when they do have cause to complain it is not fully dealt with.

p.2

Inspection findings

 My first line of enquiry focused on the design of the early years curriculum. I was interested to explore how it was engaging the boys and ensuring that they make good progress. While the proportion of children in Reception who have a good level of development has increased since the school became an academy, the girls have outshone the boys.  School leaders, supported by the trust’s early years leader, have reformed the curriculum in Reception. This has had a particular focus on developing pupils’ creativity and writing, especially the boys. Leaders have been effective in raising the level of challenge when pupils choose their own learning activities. Taught sessions are used effectively to help the children develop their reading and writing skills well. The multi-sensory approach that teaching staff use has been successful in helping the boys to make strong progress in their reading and writing. As a result, the children are confident in writing their own names and use

p.2

Inspection findings

their knowledge of phonics to write phonetically plausible sentences.  When children do fall behind, your staff are swift to put in additional support so that any misconceptions are tackled at an early stage. Parents who responded to Parent View commented positively about the progress their children make and the good relationships they have with teaching staff in Reception.  The proportion of children on track to reach a good level of development is high and above the level typically seen nationally.  My second area of interest focused on the impact of leaders’ actions to improve the quality of pupils’ mathematics skills in key stage 2, particularly that of the girls. Progress at the end of key stage 2 fell in 2017 and was below the national average. You have analysed the reasons for this and identified a group of girls who did not achieve as highly as they should.  You have reviewed the school’s approach to mathematics. Recent work by

p.2

Inspection findings

teachers to improve the sequencing of learning activities and help pupils connect different aspects of mathematics is beginning to bear fruit. You are actively engaging in a trust-wide project to upskill teachers in their planning of learning in mathematics in order to raise standards. I found pupils’ calculation skills to be well developed. There is some improvement in their application of their mathematics skills, but it is early days and is stronger in some classes than others. Overall, the proportion of pupils in each year group who are on track to reach the standard expected for their age is increasing. There is still more to do to ensure that the most able mathematicians achieve the higher standards.  Finally, I looked at pupils’ ability to apply their spelling, punctuation and grammar in their writing. This was no surprise to you and is clearly identified as a priority in the school improvement plan.

p.2

Inspection findings

 In all classes, teachers plan learning so that pupils have the opportunity to write often and in a wide range of styles. Pupils’ grammar is generally strong. Pupils find correcting their own, or their classmates’, work to be helpful in improving their own spelling and punctuation. The recently introduced spelling scheme is in place but its implementation is too inconsistent across the school. Consequently, the benefits are not yet being seen and pupils’ spelling is not as good as it needs to be.  Too frequently, pupils misuse capital letters and spell words incorrectly. They do not have the depth of understanding to be able to apply prefixes and suffixes with confidence and accuracy. Although pupils know about a wide range of punctuation devices, they are not confident or accurate in applying these. You recognise there is more work to do to improve the quality of teaching with respect to pupils’ accurate use of punctuation. This is often less strong in their

p.3

Inspection findings

enquiry books, where they record their findings of subjects such as science, geography and history.  You acknowledge that there is more work to do with parents, so they are better advised about the work their children are doing in English and the progress they are making.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 teachers develop key stage 2 pupils’ understanding of the mathematics they study, so that they can confidently apply their knowledge and solve problems efficiently  work continues to improve further the accuracy of pupils’ spelling and punctuation  communication with parents improves, so that parents are clearer about what their children are learning, the progress that they make and how the school is responding to their concerns.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the director of education for the Diocese of Bath and Wells, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Somerset. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, you joined me in observing learning and looking at pupils’ work. I also looked at work with your deputy headteacher and the trust’s assistant director of learning and achievement. I spoke with pupils in lessons and at the start of the school day. I met with you, your deputy headteacher and the trust’s assistant director of learning and achievement, as well as with your Reception class teacher. I met with three directors of the trust and one member of the local governing body.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I scrutinised a wide range of documentation, including the school’s own self- evaluation and development plan, assessment information and safeguarding records. I spoke with parents at the start of the school day and considered the views of 41 parents who responded to Parent View.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion