Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Castle Hill Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
16 Jan 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Jason Hughes
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
KT9 1JE
- Name on report verified
Castle Hill Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- We noted teachers’ high expectations, strong subject knowledge and the supportive feedback given to pupils. p.2
- This may indicate that the school is improving towards being outstanding. p.1
- The strong progress translates into consistent high attainment in reading, writing and mathematics for most pupils, relative to their starting points. p.1
- You work in tandem with the staff and governors, sharing your high expectations and promoting teaching and learning so that they are the best that they can be. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 987
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Lou Anderson Headteacher Castle Hill Primary School Buckland Road Chessington Surrey KT9 1JE
p.1
Short inspection of Castle Hill Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 16 January 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the predecessor school was judged to be good in February 2014.
p.1
Short inspection of Castle Hill Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education since the inspection of the predecessor school. Based on the evidence gathered during this short inspection, I am of the opinion that the school has demonstrated strong practice and marked improvement in certain areas. This may indicate that the school is improving towards being outstanding. Therefore, I am recommending that the school’s next inspection be a section 5 inspection.
p.1
Short inspection of Castle Hill Primary School
Pupils at the school are making strong progress. The dip in pupils’ achievement at the end of key stage 2 in 2017 was anticipated by the school and specific to that cohort. As shown by the evidence of this inspection and the school’s robust assessment information, the great majority of current pupils, including those who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities, make progress from their starting points in line or above their peers nationally. The strong progress translates into consistent high attainment in reading, writing and mathematics for most pupils, relative to their starting points.
p.1
Short inspection of Castle Hill Primary School
Pupils are respectful of each other and appreciate the support from adults at the school. They embrace their learning and understand exactly what is expected of them. Pupils enjoy school life, make every effort to produce their best work and are committed to the school’s ethos and values.
p.1
Short inspection of Castle Hill Primary School
You work in tandem with the staff and governors, sharing your high expectations and promoting teaching and learning so that they are the best that they can be. School improvement is your overriding goal. You continually assess and improve the school’s systems with the aim that every pupil receives the education they deserve. You monitor teaching and learning to ensure that resources are used well and have the desired impact. You have invested heavily in middle leaders, an approach that has brought about significant improvements in outcomes for all pupils. You are aware that there remain some small variations in the performance of disadvantaged pupils and that this needs continuing vigilance.
p.1
Short inspection of Castle Hill Primary School
The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and that records are detailed and of high quality. Safeguarding training is frequent and staff use the school’s safeguarding policies and procedures appropriately and effectively. The school rigorously follows up concerns over children and ensures that external agencies fulfil their obligations for pupils and their families.
p.2
Short inspection of Castle Hill Primary School
The governing body supports and challenges the effectiveness of the school’s safeguarding arrangements. Governors ensure that all staff are assessed for their suitability to work with children and that the school keeps accurate records of these checks. Pupils told me that they feel safe in school. For example, they said that assemblies give them the information they need to stay safe online.
p.2
Inspection findings
At the beginning of the inspection we agreed on three key lines of enquiry. The first was to examine how well leaders respond to any underachievement. This is because an identified group of pupils made slower than expected progress in reading, writing and mathematics in 2017. The middle leaders responsible for key stages now have an influential role in identifying underperforming pupils and ensuring that appropriate intervention has been put in place. They consistently challenge and support teachers through frequent pupil reviews, setting measurable targets and reviewing pupils’ progress. We looked in particular at current pupils’ progress in Year 6 to test out the impact of this work and the quality of teaching. We noted teachers’ high expectations, strong subject knowledge and the supportive feedback given to pupils. For example, the work set in a lesson on sentence styles promoted good progress for
p.2
Inspection findings
all pupils regardless of their starting points and needs. Where pupils had any misconceptions, teachers and teaching assistants ensured that they were addressed so that pupils had no barriers to their learning. Lesson observations, work in pupils’ books and the school’s assessment information show that pupils are now making good progress, with only small variations in the performance of particular groups. The second key line of enquiry was to evaluate the school’s work to raise pupils’ attendance. This was chosen as absence levels had been increasing recently. As a direct result of a whole-school focus, pupils’ attendance has quickly improved and is currently above national averages. You have invested in a reward system that encourages parents and carers and pupils and to work together towards high attendance. Persistent absence has fallen and is now consistently in line with national averages. The school’s detailed records also
p.2
Inspection findings
show that pupils’ punctuality has also improved. Finally, we agreed to look at the effectiveness of the school’s communication with parents. This was because I noted the omission of some required information on the school’s website. Leaders are aware of the statutory information that the website should publish and the positive effect good communication with parents has on the school community. Parents, staff and pupils are well informed and have access to all statutory documentation. Parents told me how much they appreciate the work that you do to make sure the school is the inclusive place that it is. One parent made a comment that was typical of others: ‘My two children always come home happy and share their learning.’
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that all groups of pupils continue to make progress in line with their peers nationally.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Kingston upon Thames. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
held meetings with senior leaders, a group of middle leaders and governors observed teaching jointly across the school with the headteacher heard pupils from Year 2 and 6 reading scrutinised school documents, including the safeguarding records and policies, governors’ minutes, the school website, and a wide range of school policies reviewed pupils’ books during lessons held discussions with pupils analysed pupil and teacher surveys considered 70 responses to the Ofsted online survey, Parent View also held conversations with parents and pupils in the playground.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion