Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Delph Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
23 Jan 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Elizabeth Stevens
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
OL3 5HN
- Name on report verified
Delph Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- You provide a varied, engaging and well-planned curriculum for your pupils. p.1
- A typical comment on Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire, described Delph Primary as, ‘A friendly nurturing school with a caring family ethos’. p.2
- You, staff and governors place a very high priority on keeping pupils safe. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance21
“You, staff and governors place a very high priority on keeping pupils safe.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,320
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Leigh Headteacher Delph Primary School Denshaw Road Delph Oldham Greater Manchester OL3 5HN
p.1
Short inspection of Delph Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 23 January 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in June 2013.
p.1
Short inspection of Delph Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You demonstrate clear understanding of the school’s strengths and areas for development. Leaders and staff are keen to keep improving. Along with other local schools, you have recently formed the Dovestone Learning Partnership. This has given you a welcome opportunity to share expertise and resources with other professionals and develop teaching in the school.
p.1
Short inspection of Delph Primary School
You provide a varied, engaging and well-planned curriculum for your pupils. You give them a wealth of opportunities to develop their interests and skills across different subjects. As a result, pupils enjoy their learning. For example, pupils learn to play musical instruments such as brass, violin, cello and drums. They relish playing in the school band and taking part in local music events. Your Year 6 enterprise initiative allows pupils to work alongside local businesses to design and launch a product and raise funds for charity. Through such opportunities, you raise pupils’ aspirations and ensure that they are well prepared for the next stage of their education.
p.1
Short inspection of Delph Primary School
Governors are very supportive. They are frequent visitors to school and take part in school events and trips. Consequently, governors know staff and pupils well. Governors attend training days on a regular basis. As a result, their skills are up to date. Governors use their expertise to provide a good balance of challenge and support for you and your staff.
p.1
Short inspection of Delph Primary School
Pupils enjoy coming to school. Those who spoke to me during the inspection said that they value leadership opportunities such as serving on the school council. They feel that they play an important part in making decisions such as on improving the playgrounds. Pupils feel safe and well looked after. Pupils told me that there are some instances of misbehaviour but that staff deal with these appropriately.
p.1
Short inspection of Delph Primary School
The vast majority of parents and carers share pupils’ positive view of the school. Parents of pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities were keen to describe how leaders provide valuable support which has improved pupils’ learning. A typical comment on Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire, described Delph Primary as, ‘A friendly nurturing school with a caring family ethos’. A small number of parents expressed concern that leaders do not deal with misbehaviour. However, the majority of parents stated that pupils behave well and pupils feel safe. Evidence seen during the inspection confirmed that behaviour in and out of classrooms is orderly and respectful.
p.2
Short inspection of Delph Primary School
The previous inspection asked you to further improve standards in mathematics and English by sharing the good practice that exists in the school. You have developed a collaborative working environment. Teachers are keen to improve and they share ideas and expertise. Inspectors asked you to match pupils’ work to their prior skills and knowledge. By looking at pupils’ workbooks and talking to pupils, I can see that, in most lessons, teachers carefully set work at the right level. As a result of your actions, pupils achieve well across the school in English. You have correctly identified that, in key stage 2 mathematics, work is not always challenging enough for pupils, including the most able.
p.2
Short inspection of Delph Primary School
You were also asked by previous inspectors to develop a system to measure pupils’ progress. You have done this. Leaders are now able to track how well different groups of pupils are achieving across the school. However, I found that you do not use this data precisely to evaluate the effectiveness of teaching and check pupils’ progress.
p.2
Short inspection of Delph Primary School
The leadership team has ensured that safeguarding arrangements are thorough and of high quality. You, staff and governors place a very high priority on keeping pupils safe. The school’s website provides parents with detailed information about safeguarding. Leaders provide appropriate and frequent training for staff. As a result, adults working in the school have up-to-date knowledge of the school’s safeguarding procedures. You keep detailed records in relation to safeguarding concerns. You and your staff work closely with other agencies and ensure that pupils receive the right level of care. Leaders make sure that pupils learn how to keep themselves safe, including online.
p.2
Short inspection of Delph Primary School
Leaders undertake statutory checks on the suitability of staff to work with children. Governors have ensured that the appropriate monitoring and filtering systems are in place for the school’s internet connection.
p.2
Inspection findings
The inspection focused on a number of key lines of enquiry, the first of which related to the achievement of children in the Reception Year. This was because, in 2017, children achieved less well than in previous years. During the inspection, I saw that, in both the pre-school and the Reception class, children behave well and follow school routines. They play with concentration and imagination and cooperate with others. Teachers quickly identify children’s gaps in learning and plan the curriculum carefully to meet children’s needs. Last year, children started with skills and development around those typical for children of this age. By the end of the year, their attainment was just above the national average and children had made good progress. My second key line of enquiry related to how well leaders allocate the pupil premium funding to improve outcomes for disadvantaged pupils. I found that leaders identify gaps in the learning of disadvantaged pupils with accuracy and
p.3
Inspection findings
put in place appropriate additional resources to address pupils’ individual needs. Funding is also used to ensure that disadvantaged pupils are able to access the full range of enrichment activities available. In 2017, the progress of disadvantaged pupils was typically similar to others in the school. However, leaders do not measure the impact of additional support on individual pupils closely enough to check that they are making good progress. As a result, disadvantaged pupils do not always make the progress that they should. I also looked at whether leaders were taking appropriate steps to improve the attendance of pupils, including those who have SEN and/or disabilities. I found that you monitor the attendance of all pupils including different groups. You work closely with families to improve the attendance of pupils who are not attending school regularly. You have taken appropriate actions to ensure that attendance
p.3
Inspection findings
remains good across the school, including for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. My final key line of enquiry related to the achievement of key stage 2 pupils in mathematics, including the most able. You have introduced strategies to improve teaching in mathematics and to increase the proportion of pupils reaching greater depth. Pupils’ work indicates that they gain confidence in their understanding of number. They develop accuracy in their written calculations, and there is some evidence of increased levels of challenge in the work set for some pupils. However, in some classes, pupils do not have enough opportunity to develop their mathematical skills in different ways. We agreed that pupils need further opportunity to develop their skills through problem solving and challenge.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
they analyse pupil progress data with greater accuracy and rigour to evaluate the effectiveness of teaching and to inform school improvement planning they analyse the impact of the pupil premium funding with greater accuracy and rigour to enable a higher proportion of disadvantaged pupils to make good progress in mathematics, teachers more consistently provide pupils with challenging activities that allow them to fully develop their mathematical skills.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Oldham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Information about the inspection
During this inspection, I met with you, the deputy headteacher and five teachers. I also spoke to five governors. I spoke to a representative of the local authority and the virtual-school headteacher and met with the school’s improvement partner. I talked to eight pupils from key stage 2 and spoke informally with other pupils during lessons. I also heard pupils from Year 2 and Year 6 read. I visited all classes with you, where I observed teaching and learning and looked at pupils’ work.
p.4
Information about the inspection
I took account of 93 responses to Parent View, the Ofsted online questionnaire, including free-text responses. I also spoke to five parents before school. I looked at a range of documentation, including the school’s self-evaluation, school development plan, a peer review, minutes of governing body meetings, curriculum planning documents and staff appraisal records. I evaluated safeguarding procedures including policies to keep pupils safe, staff training records, safeguarding checks and attendance information. I undertook a review of the school’s website.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion