Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 25 Jan 2018 · published 23 Feb 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Carolyn Dickinson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    25 Jan 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Carolyn Dickinson

  • Postcode verified

    HA0 3NT

Page 2 of 3
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 85% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisesafeknowledgeableconsistentfeel safeconfidentproudeffectivepromptly
Criticismconcernsbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings778w+58
  • What needs to improve67w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
842
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 92%What needs to improve 8%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Amit Hathi Headteacher Wembley High Technology College East Lane Wembley Middlesex HA0 3NT

p.1

No formal designation inspection of Wembley High Technology College

Following my visit to your academy on 25 January 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

No formal designation inspection of Wembley High Technology College

This inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for inspecting schools with no formal designation. The inspection was carried out because Her Majesty's Chief Inspector wished to determine the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements at the academy as concerns had been raised with Ofsted.

p.1

Evidence

I scrutinised the single central record and other documents relating to safeguarding and child protection arrangements. During the inspection I met with you, the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, two of the school’s designated safeguarding leaders and a consultant from the Brent Schools Partnership. I also spoke on the telephone with the chair of governors and a representative from the local authority.

p.1

Evidence

I held formal and informal discussions with pupils from all key stages. I listened to their views on how safe they feel and discussed how well the school helps them to stay safe.

p.1

Evidence

I undertook a ‘learning walk’ with you to observe pupils in their lessons. I reviewed responses to the school’s parent questionnaires. Attendance records, minutes of governing body meetings and records of the management of reported incidents of bullying were also reviewed.

p.1

Evidence

Having considered the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.2

Context

Wembley High Technology College has academy status and is a member of Wembley Multi Academy Trust. The school has an above-average number of pupils on roll, with 1,062 in Years 7 to 11 and 279 students in the sixth form. The school is heavily oversubscribed.

p.2

Context

Most pupils are from minority ethnic groups. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is significantly above average, while the proportion who are entitled to free school meals is in line with the national average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities is below average. The school’s population is stable, with relatively few pupils joining or leaving mid-year. The school is fully staffed.

p.2

Context

Leaders and governors ensure that safeguarding and child protection arrangements are in place. School leaders are knowledgeable about the latest safeguarding requirements and the potential risks to their pupils. The single central register of staff vetting checks meets requirements. Systems to keep pupils safe are embedded throughout the school. Leaders are meticulous in their monitoring of pupils’ safety and well-being. Staff are well trained and are consistent in their application of school procedures. Where necessary, referrals to external agencies are swift and records show that follow-up procedures are thorough.

p.2

Context

Governors take an active role in scrutinising the school’s processes relating to safeguarding. Minutes of governors’ meetings show that leaders regularly report safeguarding matters to governors and that governors hold leaders to account.

p.2

Context

Pupils say that they feel safe and can explain how the school helps to keep them safe. For example, they told inspectors that the school uses assemblies and the personal development curriculum to inform them how to keep safe from extremism and radicalisation. Pupils are confident and proud of their school. They value the consistent presence of senior and year leaders at break and lunchtime as well as in the surrounding area before and after school. The school is a diverse community in which pupils and staff actively promote the importance of respect and tolerance. This was a common thread in discussions with pupils and was evident in observations of pupils’ behaviour. Neither pupils nor staff accept discriminatory behaviour. Pupils report that bullying is rare. The school records show that any incidents of bullying are followed up promptly and appropriate action is taken. Sixth-form students are effective role models for younger pupils. They mentor

p.2

Context

younger pupils both academically and pastorally. Students in the sixth form are very aware of their responsibilities both within the school and to the local community.

p.3

Context

During my discussion with students, they reported that the leadership development programme and the independent careers advice and guidance they receive help them prepare for their next steps. However, students also reported that they would benefit from a greater balance in the advice given regarding career routes. Currently, information and guidance about apprenticeship opportunities is not as available as the information received in relation to higher education.

p.3

External support

The school works closely with Brent local authority and the Brent Schools Partnership. The school uses the services of Brent Schools Partnership to assist in the evaluation of all aspects of the school’s provision.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 Further improve the careers information and guidance to pupils so they receive comprehensive information about all career routes, including apprenticeship and employment with training.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body and the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Brent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion