Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Stone Bay School
Summary
Mark Dale-Emberton (lead), Susan Conway
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
16 Jan 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Mark Dale-Emberton, Susan Conway
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
CT10 1EB
- Name on report verified
Stone Bay School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- At the time of the last inspection, inspectors highlighted the many strengths of the school, including how pupils made consistently good or outstanding progress, sometimes from very low starting points. p.2
- You provide inspirational leadership and are determined to provide the best possible outcomes for pupils. p.1
- School leaders and governors ensure that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and highly effective. p.2
- Pupils are extremely positive about the school. p.1
- Teachers now plan activities that consistently match the academic needs of pupils, enabling most pupils to make strong progress in their learning over time. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,074
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr Billy McInally Headteacher Stone Bay School 70 Stone Road Broadstairs Kent CT10 1EB
p.1
Short inspection of Stone Bay School
Following my visit to the school on 16 January 2018 with Mark Dale-Emberton, Ofsted Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in June 2013.
p.1
Short inspection of Stone Bay School
The leadership team and governors have maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You provide inspirational leadership and are determined to provide the best possible outcomes for pupils. Members of the wider leadership team share your vision of excellence. They are passionate about improving the school. The newly established governing body is confident that its partnership with you will enable the school to move forward at a rapid rate.
p.1
Short inspection of Stone Bay School
Pupils are extremely positive about the school. They say they are happy and the teachers are fun. Pupils join the school having often had previously negative experiences of education. Leaders collect detailed information about pupils before they start at the school, ensuring their successful transition. The staff take the time to make everything just right. They use their knowledge of the pupils to produce challenging individual programmes that allow the pupils to make progress. As a result, pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around school is good and there is a high level of pupil engagement and enjoyment. Parents spoke enthusiastically about the school to inspectors. One parent commented: ‘The school is determined to try everything from a, b and c, and if that doesn’t work, they don’t give up, they try d, e and f.’
p.1
Short inspection of Stone Bay School
All staff are trained to support pupils using a positive behaviour approach. The school employs trained internal instructors who work with staff teams to provide consistency. This has been successful in dramatically decreasing incidents of poor behaviour. Governors make a strong contribution to the school’s improvement. Together with your governing body, you have developed an effective online communication system where all school information, including reports, action plans and assessment tracking, is easily accessible. Governors are confident that you have the drive to move the school forward.
p.1
Short inspection of Stone Bay School
At the time of the last inspection, inspectors highlighted the many strengths of the school, including how pupils made consistently good or outstanding progress, sometimes from very low starting points. Inspectors also identified that activities were not always challenging enough and that teachers did not always modify activities in lessons, which impacted negatively on pupils’ progress. Leaders have addressed these matters successfully. Teachers now plan activities that consistently match the academic needs of pupils, enabling most pupils to make strong progress in their learning over time.
p.2
Short inspection of Stone Bay School
Since the last inspection, leaders have continued the process of self-evaluation. You were able to explain the school’s many strengths as well as the priorities for improvement. You agreed with me that your new system to track pupils’ progress needs further time to embed. We also agreed that leaders and governors need to track the impact of additional government funding more effectively to ensure that this funding is having the maximum impact and being used for the purpose it is intended.
p.2
Short inspection of Stone Bay School
A strong culture of safeguarding is evident in the school. School leaders and governors ensure that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and highly effective. The single central record is fully compliant. The school’s recruitment procedures are secure. Staff training around safeguarding is thorough and includes regular updates. New staff follow a comprehensive induction programme which is effective in guaranteeing they know their role in safeguarding pupils and keeping them safe.
p.2
Short inspection of Stone Bay School
The school has excellent relationships with parents and outside agencies, working collectively with them to support pupils. All parents and staff who completed the Ofsted online surveys believe that the school keeps pupils safe. Pupils told inspectors that they feel safe in school. One pupil commented, ‘It’s the best school in the world.’
p.2
Inspection findings
Since the previous inspection, leaders have developed a robust system to track pupils’ progress. They not only monitor academic progress, but also pupils’ development in communication and independence, as well as their improvements in social interaction and behaviour. All the data is stored centrally and accessible to all staff. This is enabling leaders and staff to track progress and plan interventions increasingly effectively. The school has begun to analyse how improving pupils’ engagement can reduce incidents of inappropriate behaviour. Measures introduced as a result are leading to stronger progress. All staff evaluate pupils’ engagement in every lesson, and the resulting information is used to inform planning. Although this system has only recently been introduced, early indications are already showing positive results. Progress is good across the curriculum, including for those pupils eligible for pupil
p.2
Inspection findings
premium and catch-up funding. Leaders have rightly identified communication as a major barrier to progress and have used additional funding to employ a speech and language therapist. The speech and language therapist assesses all pupils and provides effective individual communication programmes. All staff are trained to deliver the communication programmes and, as a result, pupils’ language skills are developing, enabling them to access the curriculum and increase their social interaction. Leaders and governors do not, as yet, monitor this work, or the additional support for Year 7 pupils, rigorously enough to enable them to have a clear understanding of its effectiveness. Strong teaching in the sixth form has ensured that pupils make progress in all three of the school’s offered pathways. Leaders have devised a broad and balanced curriculum in key stage 5. This was designed to maximise the pupils’
p.3
Inspection findings
potential, both academically and also while developing their personal, social, communication and independence skills. As a result, pupils thrive. They are fully prepared for their next steps after leaving school and for life in the wider community.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
new systems to track wider outcomes are further developed, so that leaders and governors can analyse pupils’ progress in all areas more efficiently, and that teachers can plan next steps in their personal development additional government funding is monitored more closely, so that they have a clearer understanding of its impact on pupils’ progress.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Kent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During this inspection, inspectors met with you and the school’s leadership team, other members of staff and the joint chairs of the governing body. I also met with your local authority adviser. Inspectors visited a range of classes covering all year groups, observing pupils’ learning, talking with them about their progress, and looking at their books. These observations were conducted jointly with members of the leadership team. We spoke to the school council as well as talking to parents on the telephone. We looked at all the responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaires, considering the views of four parents and 22 members of staff. We scrutinised a sample of pupils’ work, and looked at a range of documentation, including information about the work of governors, safeguarding, the curriculum, and assessment. We examined the school’s tracking of pupils’ progress and attainment, and leaders’ self-evaluation and plans for improvement.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion