Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Martin Ayres

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Martin Ayres

  • Postcode verified

    TA1 4DY

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 59% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveoutstandingwell plannedstrengthknowledgeablesupportiveclearlytimely
Criticismdelaysat risk

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings722w+58
  • What needs to improve134w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
856
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 28, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 16%

Full report text

Mrs L Goll Director of Children Services Somerset County Council County Hall Taunton Somerset TA1 4DY

p.1

arrangements within Somerset County Council children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Somerset County Council which was conducted on 4 and 5 May 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within Somerset County Council children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within Somerset County Council children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within Somerset County Council children’s services

The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in July 2010 have substantially been addressed. One area for further development remains.

p.1

arrangements within Somerset County Council children’s services

From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ The countywide organisation for contact, referral and assessment services is effective. ‘Somerset Direct’ provides a central point for all contacts and referrals and is an outstanding model. Managers within ‘Somerset Direct’ are Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

Strengths

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk knowledgeable and supportive and set high work standards. The presence of qualified social workers and managers within this service is appropriate in determining appropriate thresholds for intervention. Administrative support within ‘Somerset Direct’ and in area teams is good.

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Managers at all levels are active in fully supporting contact, referral and assessments processes. Social work and administrative staff state that managers are accessible, helpful and provide the necessary leadership. Cooperation between area teams is very good and provides flexibility in meeting changing work demands and staffing needs.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Social workers are well trained in contact, referral and assessment processes and there is a systematic assessment of capability before staff are permitted to undertake this work.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Processes for contact, referral and assessment are clearly defined and effective. Practice is in line with statutory requirements and supported by a good information and recording system. Thresholds are clearly stated and understood.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Incoming contacts and referrals are appropriately recorded, prioritised and allocated to well trained staff. Management support and guidance is readily available to customer advisers and social workers at all stages.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Most assessments, including initial and core, are timely although there are some delays in recording in a minority of cases at times of peak activity. Where delays occur managers take an active role in overseeing work and tracking work pressures.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Child protection investigations are well planned and implemented and include joint action with the police and other agencies where needed. Inter-agency cooperation in referral, assessment and planning accords with national requirements.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Social worker visits to children and young people are at least in line with national requirements and children and young people are appropriately involved as part of the assessment of need and risk.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Emergency duty arrangements are robust and ensure that children and young people who may be at risk outside normal working hours are appropriately assessed and assisted. There is good communication between Somerset Direct and the emergency duty team.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Managers have good access to real-time performance information to enable them to plan the delivery of services and to respond promptly with any fluctuations in work pressures. Themed audits are routinely undertaken with clear reporting arrangements to the senior management team and the local safeguarding children board.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Staff supervision follows a countywide format and is consistent with regard to individual cases. Management direction on individual cases is recorded and management sign-off is evidenced in most cases.

p.3

following areas

ƒ The commitment to review the provision of early intervention services, opportunities for inter-agency integration and the use of the common assessment framework is timely and appropriate.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Further work is needed to ensure that decisions on cases, including case closure, are fully documented and the narrative includes clear analyses, outcomes and contingency plans.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The format for staff supervision on individual cases does not extend to the inclusion of staff performance information for purposes of agreeing personal training and development plans or the routine appraisal of individual staff performance.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Work pressures remain within ‘Somerset Direct’ and across the areas. Although managers provide an effective overview and deal with fluctuations in service demand elected members need to ensure resource levels are kept under constant review.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Sheila Wheeler, Chief Executive, Somerset County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion