Other · Local authority data pack
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 606
- shorter than usual (typical 3558)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 28, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Ged Rowney Director of Children's Services Stoke-on-Trent City Council Floor 2, Civic Centre Glebe Street Stoke-on-Trent Staffordshire ST4 1RU
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Ofsted guidance published in May 2009 explained that the annual rating would derive from a new performance profile of the quality of services and outcomes for children and young people in each local area. This profile includes findings from across Ofsted’s inspection and regulation of services and settings for which the council has strategic or operational responsibilities, either alone or in partnership with others, together with data from the relevant Every Child Matters indicators in the new National Indicator Set (NIS).
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
In considering the evidence in the profile to determine the children’s services rating for 2009 it has become clear that the continuing gaps in the data are significant, particularly those relating to aspects of social care and services for Looked After Children. Ofsted has decided therefore to use 2009 as a transitional year easing into the full application of the new system in 2010. As a consequence, although the performance profile remains central to Ofsted’s rating, we have interpreted the performance bands with flexibility and exercised professional judgement with caution.
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
The annual rating derives from a four point scale:
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
4 Performs excellently An organisation that significantly exceeds minimum requirements 3 Performs well An organisation that exceeds minimum requirements 2 Performs adequately An organisation that meets only minimum requirements 1 Performs poorly An organisation that does not meet minimum requirements
p.1
Children’s services annual rating
Within each level there will be differing standards of provision. For example, a rating of ‘performs excellently’ does not mean all aspects of provision are perfect. Similarly, a rating of ‘performs poorly’ does not mean there are no adequate or even good aspects. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020-7421-6716 Direct F 020-7421-5715 juliet.winstanley@ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Children’s services in Stoke-on-Trent City Council perform adequately.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
The overall effectiveness of the majority of inspected and regulated services and settings is adequate. Performance is good or better in just under a half of services. The quality of early years provision is good and better than that in similar authorities. Improvements to provision have been slower in the primary and secondary sector but nevertheless are reflected in half of primary schools and a third of secondary schools providing good or better education. Very few settings are inadequate. The large majority of judgements for staying safe and the majority of judgements for enjoying and achieving are in line with those for similar areas.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
The quality of education and care provision for children and young people whose circumstances make them vulnerable is good. All six children’s homes, four of five special schools and one of two pupil referral units are good or outstanding and none is inadequate. The local authority’s fostering and adoption agencies were judged as adequate at their most recent inspection and private fostering arrangements were judged as good.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Performance against the majority of national indicators, including those for staying safe and enjoying and achieving, is in line with in similar areas. However, a third of indicators are below similar areas and national figures. The gap in achievement between children and young people whose circumstances make them more vulnerable and their peers is closing in line with similar areas and as seen nationally.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
The children’s services rating is provided for the purpose of section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. The rating of local authority children’s services will contribute significantly to the managing performance theme of each local authority’s Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) organisational assessment and therefore to the score for each local authority overall.
p.2
Children’s services rating Performs adequately (2)
Juliet Winstanley Divisional Manager, CAA
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion