Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected —

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    IP1 2BX

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectiveeffectiveeffectivelyhigh qualitystrengthconsistentlypositivetimely
Criticismpoorfailednot alwaysvariabletoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings722w+87
  • What needs to improve153w−67

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
875
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Very hard
Flesch 29, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 17%

Full report text

Mr Simon White Director for Children’s and Young People’s Services Suffolk County Council Endeavour House 8 Russell Road Ipswich Suffolk IP1 2BX

p.1

arrangements within Suffolk County Council children’s services

This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in Suffolk County Council which was conducted on 13 and 14 July 2011. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.

p.1

arrangements within Suffolk County Council children’s services

The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.

p.1

arrangements within Suffolk County Council children’s services

The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within Suffolk County Council children’s services

The eight areas for development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in July 2010 have been addressed, other than the quality of initial assessments and the recording of ethnicity, which remain areas for development.

p.1

arrangements within Suffolk County Council children’s services

The area for priority action identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in July 2010 has been fully addressed. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570

p.1

arrangements within Suffolk County Council children’s services

Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:

p.1

Strengths

ƒ Core assessments are of a high quality and relevant research informs the analysis well. This ensures that the risk and protective factors that impact on a child’s safety are assessed to a consistently high standard.

p.2

Strengths

ƒ Service users’ views are taken into consideration in both assessments of their needs and service planning. The culture of participation is supported by highly effective advocacy arrangements, with targeted schemes in place in partnership with the voluntary sector, for both children and adults with a learning difficulty. The recording of children and young people’s views in assessments was an area for development at the previous unannounced inspection.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Area teams are fully staffed by qualified social workers and there is a good balance of practice experience. This enables the prompt allocation of assessments; there is no unallocated work and caseloads are manageable. This was an area for priority action at the previous unannounced inspection.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Timely action is taken to ensure that children are safe. This includes prompt strategy discussions with the police, who are co-located and an effective child protection conferencing system, which is outcome focused and sets measurable performance requirements.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Supervision of social workers is regular and recorded and decision making can be read across on to case files. This was an area for development at the previous unannounced inspection.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The common assessment framework is fully embedded across agencies and leads to positive outcomes for children and young people. Decisions to step up to and down from statutory assessment processes are clear and appropriate.

p.2

following areas

ƒ Newly qualified social workers receive a comprehensive induction programme, which includes additional supervision and the opportunity to network with peers. This significantly enhances the quality of services to the children that they work with. This was an area for development at the previous unannounced inspection.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The multi-disciplinary access team works effectively in partnership to process contacts and referrals and ensure that they are promptly and appropriately allocated; for example, to the children with additional needs team for an assessment of children with a disability. This was an area for development at the previous unannounced inspection. ƒ A programme of auditing by managers ensures that practice issues are accurately identified and corrective action is taken; for example the planned reduction in the rate of re-referrals to the service through greater clarity over the definition of a referral.

p.2

following areas

ƒ The out of hours service is effectively linked to daytime services and has the capacity to call upon additional resources to protect children, such as emergency residential and fostering placements.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The completion of initial assessments is variable; some seen by inspectors were of good quality but others were out of time and the quality was poor. For example, they failed to draw upon information previously known to the service. Too many resulted in re-referrals and thus impeded prompt and effective access to services for children and their families. This was an area for development at the previous unannounced inspection.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ The ethnicity of children is not always appropriately recorded. This was an area for development at the previous inspection.

p.3

Areas for development

ƒ Access for social workers to the electronic recording system at outreach offices is unreliable, and this impedes prompt and accurate recording of direct work with children.

p.3

Areas for development

Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

Copy: Lucy Robinson, Interim Chief Executive, Suffolk County Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion