Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Cradle Hill Community Primary School

Inspected 23 Jan 2018 · published 19 Feb 2018 · URN 114434

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    23 Jan 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Bruce Waelend

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BN25 3BA

  • Name on report verified

    Cradle Hill Community Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+76Very positivemore positive than 73% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongimprovedgood progressenjoyhigh expectationsaccurateclearrapid progress
Criticismat riskconcernsstrugglebelowlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1346w+76
  • What needs to improve121w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,456
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Andrea Keith Acting Headteacher Cradle Hill Community Primary School Lexden Road Seaford East Sussex BN25 3BA

p.1

Short inspection of Cradle Hill Community Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 23 January 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in March 2014.

p.1

Short inspection of Cradle Hill Community Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education since the last inspection. Since taking over as acting headteacher you have made a positive impact on pupils, staff, parents and carers. You know the school well, have an encouraging, enthusiastic approach, and have already made some changes for the better. One member of staff commented, ‘She has opened a new door of opportunities for children and staff alike.’

p.1

Short inspection of Cradle Hill Community Primary School

Pupils enjoy coming to school. They appreciate the way that teachers bring learning to life and help pupils to achieve well. One parent said, ‘My children love learning… Staff deliver the curriculum in in a fun and engaging way.’ Pupils agree that lessons are enjoyable because staff make learning interesting and challenging. Pupils behave well and show kindness and thoughtfulness to each other. They have complete confidence in staff to sort out any issues that arise. Staff also have high expectations of pupils and most fallings out or disagreements are quickly sorted out by pupils themselves.

p.1

Short inspection of Cradle Hill Community Primary School

The staff team is strong and united, so morale is very high. All staff agree that they feel proud to be part of the team and enjoy working at the school. One staff member commented, ‘It is a privilege and a pleasure to work here.’ Staff at all levels have many opportunities to develop their skills through regular, personalised training and professional development. Leaders have developed a team of staff with a wealth of talent in a range of areas. Senior leaders use teachers’ skills and knowledge to improve teaching, sharpen assessment practice and accelerate pupils’ progress across the school. You are outward looking and provide staff with opportunities to share their expertise by supporting other local schools.

p.1

Short inspection of Cradle Hill Community Primary School

Governors know the school well, drawing on a range of sources of information to reach an accurate view of it. They have a good mixture of skills, including those in finance and education. Governors are ambitious and offer the right balance of support and challenge. Senior leaders acknowledge that governors would be strengthened further if the school’s pupil tracking system provided governors with more information about the progress of groups of pupils.

p.2

Short inspection of Cradle Hill Community Primary School

At the previous inspection, senior leaders were asked to improve teaching in the school. Leaders have fully addressed the issues raised. Staff are particularly skilled at assessing pupils’ learning during lessons and responding appropriately when pupils find work too easy or start to struggle. Where necessary, staff arrange for extra teaching to help pupils master the new idea before the next lesson. Inspectors also asked leaders to develop pupils’ accurate use of grammar in all their subjects. Written work in pupils’ books gives clear evidence of the improved accuracy in the use of grammar and punctuation in pupils’ writing.

p.2

Short inspection of Cradle Hill Community Primary School

You recognise that there is still work to be done to ensure that the school’s website – including the pupil premium strategy – meets statutory requirements.

p.2

Short inspection of Cradle Hill Community Primary School

School leaders have ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Leaders ensure that all staff understand their responsibilities to keep pupils safe. As a result, pupils feel safe in school. Pupils have a very clear understanding of bullying, but say that it only happens rarely and is quickly dealt with by staff.

p.2

Short inspection of Cradle Hill Community Primary School

All staff are clear about the signs that might indicate that a pupil is at risk and understand how to report any concerns that they have, including using the newly introduced online system. Detailed policies and procedures are in place and reviewed regularly. Regular training means that staff understand and implement key aspects of safeguarding. Governors play an important role in checking that staff records are accurate as well as verifying that other important aspects of safeguarding, such as health and safety, are in place.

p.2

Inspection findings

 We agreed to consider four key lines of enquiry. The first of these explored how well teaching enables the most able pupils to achieve the high standards of which they are capable. In 2017, the proportion of pupils achieving the greater depth standards at the end of Year 6 was below that seen nationally. However, a greater proportion of pupils currently in the school are on track to achieve the higher standards. This is so in all year groups. Evidence in pupils’ books shows that the most able pupils, including many of the most able disadvantaged pupils, are making good progress in writing and mathematics. Leaders rightly attribute this to good-quality teaching that engages pupils’ interest and sets high levels of expectation. When the most able pupils have mastered the skill being taught, they are quickly provided with challenging work to extend and apply their skills in different contexts.  The second key line of enquiry investigated the progress that pupils make in

p.2

Inspection findings

writing, especially in key stage 2. Senior leaders have harnessed the considerable amount of expertise among staff in the school in teaching and assessing writing. Pupils currently in key stage 2 are making strong progress. We saw many examples of pupils of all attainment levels developing greater accuracy and fluency in their writing. This is because teachers introduce pupils to high-quality texts to inspire them and provide helpful examples for them to follow. As a result, pupils develop their own voice and style in writing, while at the same time becoming more accurate and adventurous in their use of spelling, grammar and punctuation.  Third, we looked at how effectively leaders and governors use the pupil premium funding to accelerate the progress of disadvantaged pupils. We agreed that disadvantaged pupils achieved less well than other pupils in school and other pupils nationally in most subjects in 2017. You also acknowledge that the

p.3

Inspection findings

pupil premium funding statement does not meet statutory requirements, as it does not identify barriers to learning. Neither does it explain the reasons for the spending or evaluate its impact.  Leaders and staff know pupils well, including disadvantaged pupils, and provide support to help most achieve successfully. Teachers keep detailed records of pupils’ levels of attainment and set challenging targets for individuals. However, leaders do not track the attainment or progress of groups of pupils other than those in Years 2 and 6 because the school’s tracking system does not enable them to do so. This severely restricts their ability to evaluate the impact of their actions to accelerate the progress of disadvantaged pupils. Nevertheless, evidence seen in books shows clearly that most disadvantaged pupils across the school are making good progress. Some are making rapid progress, including some of the most able disadvantaged pupils.

p.3

Inspection findings

 Finally, we examined the attendance of disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities. Leaders recognise that in the past these pupils’ attendance has not been high enough. Senior leaders have worked hard to raise the levels of attendance by rewarding regular attendance at school and constantly reminding parents of the importance of being at school on time every day. Pupils understand the acronym HERO (Here Every day Ready On time.) As a result, the attendance in school has improved and the attendance of disadvantaged pupils has improved even more this year. However, despite clear evidence of the disproportionate impact of small numbers of pupils with significant medical needs, the attendance of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is still low.  We discussed your school’s website, which is missing several documents, including a strategy for the spending of pupil premium funding. Some out-of-date

p.3

Inspection findings

policies and specific information about the spending of the physical education and sport premium for primary schools require attention. Consequently, the school’s website does not fully comply with the statutory requirements regarding what schools should publish on their website.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 pupils’ progress across all groups and years is rapid by implementing a pupil- tracking system that enables leaders to track and evaluate the attainment and progress of groups of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils and the most able  the pupil premium strategy meets statutory requirements by including the barriers to learning faced by disadvantaged pupils and the impact of the pupil premium spending on pupils’ outcomes, including their attendance  the school website meets all statutory requirements.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for East Sussex. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

I met with you, the deputy headteacher, other leaders and four members of the governing body. I spoke with a representative of the local authority on the telephone. Together with the deputy headteacher, we visited classes from all year groups in the school to look at teaching and learning. We looked at pupils’ work. I met with a group of four middle leaders. I observed pupils’ behaviour around the school and had a meeting with a group of 10 pupils from Years 2 to 6. Thirty-four responses to the staff survey and 122 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, including 81 written comments, were taken into account. I spoke to several parents at the beginning of the day. Some of the documents I scrutinised included the school’s self-evaluation documents, the school’s pupil-tracking information and the school’s development plan. I examined the school’s safeguarding policies, procedures and checks.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion