Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Richard Nash
- Postcode verified
RG14 1BZ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This enables children and young people who are in need, including those in need of protection, to consistently receive timely, effective and well co-ordinated services out-of-hours. p.2
- Early intervention services are very well established across West Berkshire. p.2
- Consistent and effective management oversight of high risk cases is clearly and comprehensively recorded. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However, the implementation of a new policy regarding the use of family support workers is not yet fully effective and in some instances they hold inappropriately complex work. p.3
- In some cases this leads to delays in assessments being concluded. p.3
- However inexperienced staff do not consistently receive the level of formal supervision that is required given the complexity of work allocated to them. p.3
- Although appropriate action has been taken to address this, the rate of re-referrals remains high. p.3
- Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area. p.3
- Copy: Nick Carter, Chief Executive, West Berkshire Council Stephen Barber, Chair of West Berkshire Safeguarding Children Board Gordon Lundie, Lead Member for Children’s Services, West Berkshire Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 809
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Very hard
- Flesch 24, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 18%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Margaret Goldie Corporate Director for Children and Young People Civic Offices West Berkshire Council West Street House West Street Newbury RG14 1BZ
p.1
arrangements within West Berkshire children’s services
This letter summarises the findings of the recent unannounced inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements within local authority children’s services in West Berkshire Council which was conducted on 16 and 17 November 2010. The inspection was carried out under section 138 of the Education and Inspections Act 2006. It will contribute to the annual review of the performance of the authority’s children’s services, for which Ofsted will award a rating later in the year. I would like to thank all of the staff we met for their assistance in undertaking this inspection.
p.1
arrangements within West Berkshire children’s services
The inspection sampled the quality and effectiveness of contact, referral and assessment arrangements and their impact on minimising any child abuse and neglect. Inspectors considered a range of evidence, including: electronic case records; supervision files and notes; observation of social workers and senior practitioners undertaking referral and assessment duties; and other information provided by staff and managers. Inspectors also spoke to a range of staff including managers, social workers, other practitioners and administrative staff.
p.1
arrangements within West Berkshire children’s services
The inspection identified areas of strength and areas of practice that met requirements, with some areas for development.
p.1
arrangements within West Berkshire children’s services
The areas of development identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in 12 and 13 January 2010 have been addressed with one exception that relates to casework allocations to family support workers.
p.1
arrangements within West Berkshire children’s services
The area of priority action identified at the previous inspection of contact, referral and assessment arrangements in January 2010 has been addressed. Freshford House Redcliffe Way Bristol BS1 6NL T 0300 1231231 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 03000 130570
p.1
arrangements within West Berkshire children’s services
Safeguarding.lookedafterchildren@ofsted.gov.uk From the evidence gathered, the following features of the service were identified:
p.1
Strengths
Prompt and responsive strengthening of resources within the referral and assessment service, due to a significant increase in demand, has assisted the improved timeliness of assessments and manageable workloads.
p.2
Strengths
The out-of-hours service has developed very strong inter-agency relationships and access to resources. This enables children and young people who are in need, including those in need of protection, to consistently receive timely, effective and well co-ordinated services out-of-hours.
p.2
Strengths
Early intervention services are very well established across West Berkshire. A comprehensive common assessment framework register and monthly multi- agency panels enable services to deliver effective interventions to children with identified additional needs.
p.2
following areas
Child protection policy and procedures are in place and provide a clear framework for agencies to meet their responsibilities.
p.2
following areas
Consistent and effective management oversight of high risk cases is clearly and comprehensively recorded.
p.2
following areas
Where children are clearly identified as suffering from significant harm, child protection arrangements work well.
p.2
following areas
Completed assessments appropriately identify risk and protective factors that impact upon children’s safety and welfare.
p.2
following areas
Assessments include an appreciation of the issues for young people arriving unaccompanied to the United Kingdom and for minority ethnic families and ensures the provision of culturally suitable services.
p.2
following areas
Case file and thematic audits are used well to inform the management and development of the referral and assessment service and to improve the quality of individual casework.
p.2
following areas
In most cases records, including case chronologies, are up-to-date, clear and support effective case planning.
p.2
following areas
In most cases children are seen promptly and their views are consistently sought and taken into account in case work assessment and planning.
p.2
following areas
Arrangements for the transfer of cases between referral and assessment and other teams are robust and enable the prompt delivery of preventative services.
p.2
Areas for development
Most cases held within the referral and assessment service are allocated to suitably qualified staff. However, the implementation of a new policy regarding the use of family support workers is not yet fully effective and in some instances they hold inappropriately complex work.
p.3
Areas for development
Social work caseloads are manageable and balanced, although the more skilled, qualified staff experience significant additional pressures due to the frequency that they are required to undertake child protection enquiries.
p.3
Areas for development
Assessments which exceed statutory timescales are not consistently or robustly monitored. In some cases this leads to delays in assessments being concluded.
p.3
Areas for development
Social workers generally receive good support and management oversight. However inexperienced staff do not consistently receive the level of formal supervision that is required given the complexity of work allocated to them.
p.3
Areas for development
The inaccurate classification of some contacts as referrals has contributed to a high rate of re-referrals during this year. Although appropriate action has been taken to address this, the rate of re-referrals remains high.
p.3
Areas for development
Any areas for development identified above will be specifically considered in any future inspection of services to safeguard children within your area.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Copy: Nick Carter, Chief Executive, West Berkshire Council Stephen Barber, Chair of West Berkshire Safeguarding Children Board Gordon Lundie, Lead Member for Children’s Services, West Berkshire Council Andrew Spencer, Department for Education
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion