Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Ravenfield Primary Academy

Inspected 9 Jan 2018 · published 2 Feb 2018 · URN 141731

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    9 Jan 2018

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kirsty Godfrey

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    S65 4LZ

  • Name on report verified

    Ravenfield Primary Academy

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 24% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehigh expectationsimprovedconsistentlystrongpositiveeffectivewell supportedvery well
Criticismdecliningpoorseriouslyconcernbelowgapsnot yetpersistent absence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1404w+52
  • What needs to improve98w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,496
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Christine Le-Voguer Principal Ravenfield Primary Academy Moor Lane North Ravenfield Rotherham South Yorkshire S65 4LZ

p.1

Short inspection of Ravenfield Primary Academy

Following my visit to the school on 9 January 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since your predecessor school was judged to be good in November 2012.

p.1

Short inspection of Ravenfield Primary Academy

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. There have been many changes in the school’s leadership in the last few years. You began your post as principal in September 2016, just over a year after the school became an academy as part of the Maltby Learning Trust. You have high expectations for pupils and have challenged any underperformance in the quality of teaching. This has resulted in some staffing changes. However, staffing is now becoming more settled and the quality of teaching has improved. This is enabling more rapid improvements in pupils’ learning. Additionally, you have accurately determined the right priorities for improvement and leaders’ actions are resulting in marked success.

p.1

Short inspection of Ravenfield Primary Academy

Outcomes for pupils are generally strong. The proportion of children reaching a good level of development at the end of the early years has been consistently above the national average. By the end of key stage 1, reading, writing and mathematics standards continued to improve in 2017. The proportion of pupils meeting and exceeding the standard was above the national average in all three subjects. However, the proportion of pupils meeting the standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check has been steadily declining and was just below the national average in 2017. At the end of key stage 2, reading and mathematics standards have been consistently in line with or above the national averages for the last two years. However, in writing, pupils’ progress has not been as positive and attainment has been below the national average. You have taken action to remedy the situation with the support of the multi-academy trust. There are encouraging signs of

p.1

Short inspection of Ravenfield Primary Academy

improvement but you are acutely aware that some of the new approaches need to become more embedded to enable faster improvement.

p.2

Short inspection of Ravenfield Primary Academy

You have been well supported by the multi-academy trust as you establish your staffing team. Leadership support from trust leaders with specific expertise has been available to support you in addressing some of the school’s improvement priorities. This has added additional capacity to increase the pace of change. Additionally, it has helped to create a positive culture among your staff. They feel supported and valued and particularly recognise the impact of the training they have received and can articulate how it has improved their teaching and pupils’ learning. However, as many middle leadership posts within school are new, you acknowledge the need to develop these leaders so there is less reliance on trust support in the future.

p.2

Short inspection of Ravenfield Primary Academy

There are a few parents and carers who have been resistant to the necessary changes you have made since taking up appointment. However, you have been keen to engage with parents and have introduced a range of workshops and events to help parents be more involved in their child’s learning. This has been welcomed by parents. For example, as some parents explained to me, it helps them to understand how phonics is taught so they can use the same approach at home.

p.2

Short inspection of Ravenfield Primary Academy

You have created a purposeful learning environment for pupils. As a result, they behave very well and have positive attitudes to their learning. Pupils talk about the 5 R’s and can articulate how learning about them has helped them to become more effective learners. For example, they use their resilience to approach tricky problems. Pupils’ positive learning attitudes are also evident in the classroom. They work with each other in a respectful manner, taking turns to talk and listening to each other’s ideas.

p.2

Short inspection of Ravenfield Primary Academy

A culture of safeguarding is clearly present across the school. This is because leaders, governors and the multi-academy trust take their safeguarding responsibilities very seriously. You have ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and records are detailed and of high quality. You make sure that staff receive regular training updates so that they are effective in recognising and responding to signs of concern.

p.2

Short inspection of Ravenfield Primary Academy

Pupils say that they feel very safe in school and that staff look after them well. They do not feel that bullying is an issue. They are confident that staff deal with any rare issues of poor behaviour firmly and fairly. The curriculum effectively develops pupils’ understanding of potential dangers, such as crossing roads, bullying and using the internet. As a result, they know how to keep themselves and others safe.

p.2

Inspection findings

 You were aware that boys did not perform as well as they should have done by the end of Reception in 2016. In comparison, girls’ performance was well above the national average. However, as a result of leaders’ actions to ensure that the provision was enabling boys to develop their early reading, writing and mathematics skills, 79% of boys reached all of the literacy and mathematics early learning goals in 2017. This proportion is above the national average for boys in 2016. You have made sure that there is a range of high-quality resources and activities which support children in using and applying the skills they have been taught. The new staff team is being well supported by a trust consultant to continue to build on the successes already achieved.  You were disappointed by the declining trend in the outcomes of the Year 1 phonics screening check. Prompt action taken to introduce a new approach to

p.2

Inspection findings

teaching phonics is resulting in much more consistency in the way pupils are taught. Staff have been well trained and are therefore becoming more confident in teaching phonics. This has supported pupils to grasp their phonics skills quicker. The clear and consistent strategies are also supporting pupils’ learning attitudes and behaviour, which in turn are helping to improve the speed of pupils’ learning throughout the curriculum. At this point in the year, pupils are further along in the phonics programme than ever before and are making strong progress. This is because you have set high expectations and have made sure that staff understand the need for all pupils to be able to read as quickly as possible. Individuals who are not on track are spotted straight away and additional support is tailored to their needs. Pupils enjoy reading and read regularly at home to parents. They often re-read books in the early stages of

p.3

Inspection findings

reading so they develop greater fluency and confidence. However, you acknowledge that in order to support their reading success even further, the books need to be matched precisely to the phonics skills which pupils have just been taught. You are also aware that as staff are becoming familiar with a range of new teaching strategies, it is vital that leaders check that they are being used as consistently as possible for maximum effect.  Leaders have made sure there are regular checks on pupils’ writing attainment and progress throughout key stage 2. This has helped leaders to quickly identify any pupil who has not made enough progress. Leaders and teachers then analyse the pupil’s work to spot any gaps in learning so that precise next steps can be identified. Assessment information and work in books now show that, on the whole, pupils in key stage 2 are making better progress with writing than before. Leaders are aware that this is not yet rapid enough in every year group

p.3

Inspection findings

and that some of the new approaches are not being used consistently enough to maximise the progress made. The English leader is new to her role and is receiving effective development to support her in further improving the quality of teaching and learning in writing throughout the school.  Pupils’ attendance has been consistently above average overall and is improving even further over time. Attendance has also improved for disadvantaged pupils, whose attendance in 2015/16 was in the bottom 10% nationally at 92.7%. In 2016/17, attendance for disadvantaged pupils was 95.7%. Likewise, persistent absence continues to be much lower than national figures and has improved again last year. Leaders’ actions to introduce new systems and procedures have also dramatically reduced the number of pupils arriving late to school.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 the new teaching approaches are quickly embedded so that they continue to improve the rate of pupils’ progress  middle leaders continue to develop their skills so they can have an increasing impact on improving the quality of teaching and learning in their areas of responsibility.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body and the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Rotherham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, I held meetings with you, a range of leaders from the Maltby Learning Trust and the English subject leader. I also met with five members of the governing body, including the chair and vice-chair. I evaluated documentation, including the school’s self-evaluation, the school development plan, information about pupils’ progress, minutes of governing body meetings, attendance records, and information about safeguarding. We visited classrooms together to observe teaching and learning. Together with you, the English subject leader and a trust senior leader, we scrutinised the work of a small group of pupils. I listened to three pupils read. I spoke with several parents at the start of the school day and considered the 58 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View. I met with a group of pupils from a range of year groups and spoke with a group of teachers.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion