Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Coppice Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
11 Jan 2018
- Inspectorssingle source
Simon Hollingsworth
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
DE75 7BZ
- Name on report verified
Coppice Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2014.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance13
“Governors are as ambitious for the pupils and the staff as you are.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,421
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Alison Seaton Headteacher Coppice Primary School Roper Avenue Marlpool Heanor Derbyshire DE75 7BZ
p.1
Short inspection of Coppice Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 11 January 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in May 2014.
p.1
Short inspection of Coppice Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You and other leaders have continued to focus strongly on ensuring that pupils receive the support that they need. This means that pupils make at least the progress that they should, both academically and in their personal development.
p.1
Short inspection of Coppice Primary School
You regularly check the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement. In so doing, you are quick to identify where pupils are not making fast enough progress. The strategies you then use ensure that teachers plan effectively for pupils’ learning, and that pupils achieve well. As a result, above-average proportions of pupils in Years 2 and 6 reached at least the nationally expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics in 2017.
p.1
Short inspection of Coppice Primary School
You recognise the need to ensure that current pupils continue to achieve as highly, particularly in key stage 1. To this end, you have carefully reviewed how your teachers teach reading and mathematics to raise the proportions of current pupils who reach at least the expected standard and the higher standard. You are particularly determined that pupils’ achievement in reading matches their very high levels of achievement in mathematics.
p.1
Short inspection of Coppice Primary School
To improve the quality of teaching further, you have provided staff with regular opportunities to learn from each other’s practice. Teachers observe each other teaching. Teachers also regularly plan lessons together. You have provided these opportunities in response to the areas for improvement from the last inspection. You have also done so because you rightly recognise that these opportunities ensure that all of your teachers are effective classroom practitioners.
p.1
Short inspection of Coppice Primary School
Teachers carefully plan learning that meets pupils’ needs. They offer the right levels of support and challenge. In those lessons that I visited, pupils completed challenging work that secured their learning. Adults worked well with all pupils to check their understanding and resolve any misconceptions. Pupils engaged well with their learning because the work that they were completing was at the right level.
p.2
Short inspection of Coppice Primary School
You have ensured that pupils know to treat each other with kindness. Pupils understand the need to respect all people and to support their peers. For example, I observed older pupils who, as ‘reading champions’, worked well with younger pupils to help them with their reading. I met several ‘playground buddies’, whose responsibility at breaktime is to support other pupils who may be unhappy or who may have fallen out with their friends. These buddies spoke with pride about the importance of their role in helping other pupils.
p.2
Short inspection of Coppice Primary School
Attendance is improving. You encourage pupils to attend school regularly and behave well by celebrating good attendance and behaviour. You help pupils to develop into confident young people, who clearly enjoy learning. You rightly recognise, however, that the attendance of disadvantaged pupils is not yet high enough.
p.2
Short inspection of Coppice Primary School
Governors are as ambitious for the pupils and the staff as you are. They are fully aware of the school’s strengths and the areas in which it must improve further. The governing body provides you and other senior leaders with the right levels of challenge and support. This process ensures that pupils achieve well and make good progress in their personal development.
p.2
Short inspection of Coppice Primary School
You and other senior leaders closely check pupils’ welfare. You take timely and effective action when there is a safeguarding concern. Safeguarding leaders work closely with parents and carers and external agencies to ensure that pupils receive the support that they need. Leaders are also sensitive to safeguarding issues in the local area, and provide relevant support when these issues affect the pupils. You and other senior leaders have ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. Records are detailed and of high quality.
p.2
Short inspection of Coppice Primary School
All staff understand their responsibilities for keeping pupils safe. They receive regular training on safeguarding, as well as timely updates on any concerns that leaders may have about pupils’ welfare. Staff are aware of the different types of abuse and of the signs to look for. They know what action that they must take when they have a safeguarding concern about a pupil. The pupils I met said that they could speak to members of staff if they had a concern. They were confident that the staff would help them to resolve it.
p.2
Short inspection of Coppice Primary School
Pupils receive wide-ranging opportunities to learn how to be safe, through their lessons, assemblies, visits from speakers who work for other agencies, and the annual ‘happy and safe’ week. Pupils learn how to be safe online, when out in the community, when crossing the road and when on their bikes. Pupils know the different types of bullying, and say that bullying is very rare at the school. Pupils say that teachers deal with bullying effectively when it does occur. All of the parents who expressed an opinion on bullying in the online survey, Parent View, said that the staff deal with any such incidents effectively.
p.2
Inspection findings
In 2017, the proportion of pupils who attained the expected standard in all three of reading, writing and mathematics at the end of key stage 2 was well above the national level. This marked a significant improvement in attainment when compared with 2016. The rise was due to a large increase in the proportion of pupils who attained the expected standard in reading. This increase was because of the greater focus that teachers have placed on ensuring that pupils were secure in their reading skills, including in their comprehension skills. The school’s own performance information indicates that the majority of pupils in the current Year 6 are on track to reach the expected standard at the end of the year. They are making at least the progress they should. The pupils’ work that I looked at and the lessons that I observed confirmed this to be the case. Better teaching of reading skills has also led to an increase in the proportion of those on
p.3
Inspection findings
track to reach the higher standard. Leaders use pupil premium funding effectively to support pupils’ achievement. The difference in achievement between disadvantaged pupils at the school and other pupils nationally continues to diminish in all subjects in key stages 1 and 2. The proportion of pupils who attained the expected level in phonics at the end of Year 1 was at least in line with the national level in 2015 and 2016. This was due to the effective action that leaders took in responding to a recommendation at the last inspection to improve the teaching of phonics. The proportion of Year 1 pupils attaining the expected standard in phonics in 2017 was below the national average. You quickly took action to develop the way teachers and other adults support pupils to develop their phonic skills. This has led to an increase in the proportion of pupils in the current Year 1 who are on track to attain the expected standard in phonics.
p.3
Inspection findings
In 2017, the proportion of pupils who attained the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of key stage 1 was above the national average. This was due to teachers’ effective use of assessment information to set pupils work at the right level. Currently, the attainment of pupils in Year 1 is similarly high. Pupils in Year 2, however, are achieving lower standards in writing and mathematics than they should. Leaders have provided well-targeted support to improve pupils’ attendance. As a result, overall attendance is now closer to the national average. This includes for girls, whose attendance previously was too low and declining. While it is improving, the attendance of disadvantaged pupils remains below the national average for all pupils.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and governors should ensure that:
p.4
Next steps for the school
they work to sharpen further the quality of teaching in key stage 1, particularly for pupils in Year 2, so that more pupils reach the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of the key stage they focus on improving the attendance of disadvantaged pupils so that it improves rapidly.
p.4
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Derbyshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Information about the inspection
During the inspection, I met with you, other senior leaders, a selection of staff and four governors, including the chair of the governing body. I observed learning in all classes, jointly with you as headteacher. During these visits to lessons, I spoke with pupils and looked at their work, including in their books. I observed pupils’ behaviour when they arrived at the school, during which time I also spoke with parents. I met with a selection of pupils from Years 3, 4, 5 and 6. I also spoke with pupils informally when I observed behaviour at breaktime and lunchtime. I heard four pupils read. I spoke with the school’s improvement partner by telephone.
p.4
Information about the inspection
I examined a range of documents, including those related to safeguarding, attendance, pupils’ attainment and progress, and the school’s use of pupil premium funding. I also took into account the school’s self-evaluation and its improvement plan. I scrutinised the school’s recruitment procedures and records of the checks made on new staff and volunteers. I took into account the 32 responses to Ofsted’s online survey for parents, including the 24 responses to the free-text service. I considered 12 responses to Ofsted’s staff survey. There were no responses to the online survey for pupils. At the end of the day, I gave feedback to you, other senior leaders and members of the governing body.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion