Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Vinney Green Secure Unit

Inspected 7 Dec 2017 · URN SC035500

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jo Stephenson (lead), Lee Kirwin

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Group verified

    South Gloucestershire Council

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Dec 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jo Stephenson, Lee Kirwin

  • Name on report verified

    SC035500

  • URN verified

    SC035500

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−60Criticalmore positive than 7% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisecaring
Criticismpoor

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings20w0
  • What needs to improve260w−60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
278
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 50
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
4
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 1%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 85%

Full report text

Inspection report children’s home: SC035500 1 SC035500 Registered provider: South Gloucestershire Council

p.1

Inspected under the social care common inspection framework

p.1

Information about this children’s home

This secure children’s home is operated by a local authority and is approved by the Secretary of State to restrict young people’s liberty. The commissioning of health services in this home is the statutory responsibility of NHS England under the Health and Social Care Act 2012. Education is provided on site. The children’s home can accommodate up to 24 young people, who are aged up to 17 years. Up to 24 young people who have received a custodial sentence can be placed at this home by the Youth Custody Service. Other young people, subject of Section 25 of the Children Act 1989, can be placed by local authorities, with agreement from the Youth Custody Service. Admission of any young person under 13 years of age, subject to Section 25 of the Children Act 1989, requires the approval of the Secretary of State.

p.1

and young people since the most recent full inspection

This home was judged good at the last full inspection. At the interim inspection, Ofsted judges that it has sustained effectiveness.

p.1

and young people since the most recent full inspection

At the last inspection of the home in July 2017, four statutory requirements and nine recommendations were made. Two of the recommendations related to the education Inspection report children’s home: SC035500 2 provision and will be assessed at the next full inspection of the home.

p.1

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Of the four statutory requirements, two have been fully met. The home has developed and implemented a new incentive scheme to support consistent practice in promoting positive behaviour. The new scheme was developed in consultation with young people. It was implemented approximately two weeks before this inspection and therefore the impact cannot yet be measured. All employees now receive practice-related supervision. This ensures that staff progress and develop and in turn deliver good care to young people.

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Two statutory requirements have not been fully met, although some progress has been made. Some records relating to physical restraint now contain a description of the methods employed to avoid using the measure. Some records do not. Managers now monitor a range of practices and collate data about performance. There is no analysis of this information that generates any trends, themes or patterns leading to actions to improve provision for children. The manager produces reports of monitoring every six months that are sent to Ofsted. These are descriptive, and lack analysis of important practice areas, such as safeguarding, physical restraint and behaviour management.

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Of the seven remaining recommendations made at the last inspection, three have not been met and four have been met. One recommendation that has not been met was directly linked to recording of physical restraint and referred to above. Risk assessments relating to young people are not sufficiently detailed. Outcomes of case management meetings are not always reflected in risk assessment documents and there is sometimes insufficient information to ensure that all known risks are recorded to support staff’s positive practice. Sanctions used to address poor behaviour continue to lack sufficient focus on restorative approaches in order to help children recognise the impact of their behaviour on themselves or others. The consistency and quality of recording of key- working sessions has improved. This contributes to demonstrating that the work undertaken with children and the associated records accurately reflect the progress they

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Managers have devised and implemented an escalation policy. This means that when placing authorities, agencies or services do not fulfil their responsibilities to children, staff understand what to do to raise these matters formally to try to secure appropriate engagement. Reports of visits by the independent visitor under regulation 40 have improved. Reports are more evaluative and analytical, demonstrating the visitor’s judgement about the progress and experiences of children, and the impact that living at the home has upon children’s care, safety and well-being. Recommendations now link to the report text so that there is understanding of why they were raised. The manager has carried out a review of staffing provision and concluded that the staffing complement needs to increase, both in education and care. This is to ensure that children’s needs can be met effectively, while also maintaining safety and security. The manager confirmed

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

that the recruitment process has commenced.

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Children continue to make good progress in all aspects of their lives. Admissions are well planned and managed considering the limited time the home has on occasions to Inspection report children’s home: SC035500 3 prepare for the arrival of a child. This is linked to the contract the home has with the Youth Custody Service and the fact that children require placements quickly after court appearances. Positive admission processes help children to settle in quickly. All necessary professionals see and assess children’s needs shortly after admission and plans are developed to meet these needs. Resettlement work and planning for children leaving the home or transferring to another establishment are good, and these are reflected in case records. This work starts from the point of admission and supports children’s progress.

p.2

and young people since the most recent full inspection

The home has a well-established complaints procedure. There have been a number of complaints since the last inspection and this is an indication that children understand the system and how to use it. All complaint records show that concerns raised are dealt with in a timely manner. Records are appropriately detailed and include feedback to children and their responses to the outcome of the complaint.

p.3

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Since the last inspection, there have been a number of referrals to local authority children’s services about safeguarding matters. Referrals are timely and records appropriately detailed and clear on the actions taken to keep children safe, along with the outcomes of any enquiries or investigations. In September 2017, health professionals who deliver services to children in the home referred a number of safeguarding concerns to the designated officer in the local authority, some dating back to February 2017. The registered manager has advised that these matters do not appear to have followed the home’s child protection procedures and statutory guidance, Working Together to Safeguard Children 2015. The registered manager has confirmed that senior local authority managers and senior health managers have met with health staff to clarify expectations that statutory guidance and the home’s safeguarding procedures must be

p.3

and young people since the most recent full inspection

followed. The matters raised by health professionals are the subject of an investigation commissioned by the director of children’s services. Relevant professionals and agencies will be notified of the outcome.

p.3

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Bullying incidents do occur. Records show that any incidents are managed well with information about how the victim was supported, how the perpetrator was challenged and educated, and outcomes.

p.3

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Physical restraint is used in line with regulations. Incidents reviewed by inspectors showed that the criteria for intervention were met and records kept that include young people’s comments and views. Incidents are reviewed regularly and monitored by managers with a representative from the local authority. This includes the use of closed- circuit television.

p.3

and young people since the most recent full inspection

Monthly consultation forums are held and children’s views and wishes are listened to and acted upon as appropriate. This contributes to service development and improves children’s experiences. Inspectors observed good relationships between staff and children, with a calm, relaxed and positive feel around the home. Inspection report children’s home: SC035500 4

p.3

Inspection date Inspection type Inspection judgement

04/07/2017 Full Good 23/02/2017 Interim Improved effectiveness 13/09/2016 Full Good 12/01/2016 Full Good

p.4

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions that the registered person(s) must take to meet the Care Standards Act 2000, Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. The registered person(s) must comply within the given timescales.

p.4

Requirement Due date

The registered person must ensure that within 24 hours of the use of a measure of control, discipline or restraint in relation to a child in the home, a record is made which includes details of any methods used or steps taken to avoid the need to use the measure. (Regulation 35(3)(a)) 31/01/2018

p.4

Requirement Due date

In order to complete a quality of care review the registered person must establish and maintain a system for monitoring, reviewing and evaluating; the quality of care provided for children; any actions that the registered person considers necessary in order to improve or maintain the quality of care provide for children. (Regulation 45 (2)(a)(c)) 01/03/2018

p.4

Recommendations

 Ensure that staff continually and actively assess the risks to each child and the arrangements in place to protect them. (‘Guide to the children’s homes Inspection report children’s home: SC035500 5 regulations including the quality standards’, page 42, paragraph 9.5) In particular, ensure that managers identify and record all highlighted risks in appropriate risk management plans.

p.4

Recommendations

 Ensure that any sanctions used to address poor behaviour are restorative in nature, to help children recognise the impact of their behaviour on themselves, other children, the staff caring for them and the wider community. (‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’, page 46, paragraph 9.38)

p.5

Information about this inspection

Inspectors have looked closely at the experiences and progress of children and young people. Inspectors considered the quality of work and the differences made to the lives of children and young people. They watched how professional staff work with children and young people and each other and discussed the effectiveness of help and care provided. Wherever possible, they talked to children and young people and their families. In addition, the inspectors have tried to understand what the children’s home knows about how well it is performing, how well it is doing and what difference it is making for the children and young people whom it is trying to help, protect and look after.

p.5

Information about this inspection

This inspection focused on the effectiveness of the home and the progress and experiences of children and young people since the most recent full inspection.

p.5

Information about this inspection

Using the ‘Social care common inspection framework’, this inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service, how it meets the core functions of the service as set out in legislation, and to consider how well it complies with the Children’s Homes (England) Regulations 2015 and the ‘Guide to the children’s homes regulations including the quality standards’. Inspection report children’s home: SC035500 6

p.5

Children’s home details

Registered provider address: South Gloucestershire Adults and Health, PO box 2083, Castle Street, Thornbury, Bristol BS35 2BR

p.6

Inspectors

Shaun Common, lead professional – secure estate Jo Stephenson, social care inspector Lee Kirwin, social care inspector Inspection report children’s home: SC035500 7 achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.6

Inspectors

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspectors

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspectors

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: http://www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion