Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 18 Dec 2017 · published 24 Jan 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Marian Thomas

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    18 Dec 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Marian Thomas

  • Postcode verified

    S62 6JY

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 77% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectiveimprovedeffectivelyclearhigh expectationsengagingoutstanding
Criticisminconsistentnot alwaysinsufficientlydisruptionnot strongnot yetlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,201
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Helen McLaughlin St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School Green Lane Rawmarsh Rotherham South Yorkshire S62 6JY

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 18 December 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in July 2016. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

At its section 5 inspection before the one that took place in July 2016, the school was also judged to require improvement.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order for the school to become good.

p.1

Primary School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 improve the consistency of teaching and learning particularly in key stage 1 by continuing to rigorously monitor the quality of teaching overall and by holding teachers to account for progress pupils make over time  ensure that the most able pupils are set work that challenges them sufficiently so that they make the progress of which they are capable  increase the levels of support and challenge offered by governors to senior leaders in order to accelerate school improvement.

p.1

Primary School

An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.

p.2

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with the executive headteacher and assistant headteacher, a member of the governing body, two middle leaders and a representative from the diocese. Telephone conversations were held with a representative of the local authority and the deputy chair of governors to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. A learning walk was carried out with senior leaders and informal conversations were undertaken with several groups of pupils and two lunchtime supervisors. A work scrutiny of books belonging to disadvantaged pupils was undertaken with senior leaders. A range of documents were scrutinised, including the review of pupil premium spending and the records of monitoring visits carried out by the local authority.

p.2

Context

Since the previous inspection, the headteacher has resigned. Several members of staff have also left. Currently, the school is being led and managed by an executive headteacher and an assistant headteacher. The executive headteacher, who is currently the headteacher of Our Lady and St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School in Wath, is also a national leader of education.

p.2

Main findings

You and the assistant headteacher have quickly developed a strong working partnership which enables you to effectively carry out your role as the head of two schools. Since taking up your current post as executive headteacher in September 2017, you have brought about improvement at a fast pace. Your very clear vision for the future is now shared with staff who are responding to your high expectations with enthusiasm.

p.2

Main findings

Your initial priority to raise the quality of teaching and learning has already seen pupils’ attainment rise. Strategies such as reducing the amount of time pupils spend working outside the classroom have increased the progress made by disadvantaged pupils and their peers. You and the assistant headteacher have recognised that there is still much to do in order to improve the quality of teaching and learning to become consistently good. However, it is clear from your school improvement plan that you have mapped out a clear pathway.

p.2

Main findings

The curriculum is now more diverse and engaging. Pupils who were spoken to are enjoying subjects such as art, geography and history. Staff and pupils are looking forward to the further changes to the curriculum planned for January.

p.2

Main findings

A close working partnership is developing between the two schools you lead and manage. Staff spoke positively about the support they had received from teachers from Our Lady and St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School (in Wath), and say this partnership has increased their confidence and skills.

p.3

Main findings

You have quickly and effectively introduced a system to measure staff performance which links closely with the school’s improvement. This, coupled with a more effective monitoring system, has increased the levels of accountability of staff performance and has contributed directly to improvement overall. However, the quality of teaching and learning, particularly in key stage 1, remains inconsistent. As a result, pupils make less progress where the quality of teaching and learning is less strong. You and the assistant headteacher recognise this and systems are in place to bring about further improvement. However, currently, it is too soon to measure the impact of these changes.

p.3

Main findings

Overall, school data shows that outcomes for pupils are improving across the school, particularly in key stage 2. Work in books confirms this strong progress. The progress made by disadvantaged pupils has also improved and differences between this group and others nationally are beginning to diminish. However, the progress made by the most able pupils remains slower than it should be. This is because teachers do not always have high enough expectations of what this group of pupils can attain and work set is often insufficiently challenging.

p.3

Main findings

Pupils’ behaviour has improved since the previous inspection. Staff are now more effective at reducing low level disruption both inside and outside the classroom. Lunchtime supervisors report fewer incidents in the playground and their growing confidence to intervene at an earlier point has reduced the number of recorded incidents. The role played by pupil sports ambassadors in engaging pupils in games at lunchtime has also reduced incidents overall.

p.3

Main findings

The governing body does not yet offer sufficient challenge to senior leaders. Governors, spoken to during the inspection, felt that some improvements had been made to the way in which the governing body supports and challenges senior leaders. For example, in the recent past, governors relied too heavily on feedback from the headteacher because they lacked a fundamental understanding of how to analyse school data. Recent minutes of meetings show that although there has been some improvement, it is clear that governors are still not offering current senior leaders sufficient support and challenge to bring about the necessary improvements to the school. As a result of this underperformance, an external review of governance is required.

p.3

External support

The newly appointed executive headteacher is a national leader of education. She is playing a pivotal role in bringing about the necessary improvement to the school. Direct support from staff and leaders in Our Lady and St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School (in Wath) has enabled staff to observe strong practice and to learn from an outstanding setting. The local authority school improvement team also visits regularly and is monitoring the school’s progress. Further support and monitoring are also provided by the director for education for the diocese.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Hallam, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Rotherham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion