Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
18 Dec 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Philip Riozzi
- Postcode verified
BD20 7ES
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school should take further action to: p.1
- The plan appropriately emphasises what pupils need to learn. p.2
- Furthermore, you acknowledge the need to make sure leaders shine an even brighter light on the learning of the most able pupils, including those who may only have average prior attainment but are capable of achieving greater depth in their learning. p.2
- You recognise that leaders need to look more often at the progress pupils have made over a longer period of time and not just in the current year, to make sure they are catching up where they may have previously fallen behind. p.3
- Teachers need to challenge the most able pupils further still with even trickier problems. p.3
- Leaders and governors are clear about what exactly should improve, and by when. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,047
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 21%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Fiona Beetles Headteacher Sutton-in-Craven Community Primary School Bridge Road Sutton-in-Craven Keighley West Yorkshire BD20 7ES
p.1
Community Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 18 December 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Community Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2016. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Community Primary School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order for the school to become a good school.
p.1
Community Primary School
The school should take further action to:
p.1
Community Primary School
pay even closer attention to the progress of the most able pupils, including average prior attaining pupils who may be capable of reaching a higher standard keep an even sharper eye on the progress pupils make from their earlier starting points, not just the progress they make in any one year.
p.1
Evidence
I held meetings with you, the deputy headteacher and the mathematics leader. Together, we visited all classes in key stage 2 and looked at a sample of pupils’ mathematics workbooks. I examined assessment information, the school improvement plan, minutes of meetings of the governing body, leaders’ monitoring notes, and records of local authority visits to the school. I talked with a few parents, met with two representatives of the local authority and met with five governors, including the two co-chairs.
p.2
Context
A teacher, who was also the special educational needs coordinator, has left the school. You have appointed a newly qualified teacher to teach in Year 5. There have been a few changes to support staffing. A few governors have left and a few have joined the governing body. Two governors now share the role of chair of the governing body.
p.2
Main findings
Since the last inspection, leadership capacity has substantially increased. More teachers now have leadership responsibility. Along with your deputy, and with the help of external professionals, you have trained and coached middle leaders. You make sure they concentrate on the most important priorities.
p.2
Main findings
The school improvement plan identifies the right priorities because you and your team have accurately evaluated where the strengths and weaknesses are in the quality of teaching and in pupils’ outcomes. The plan appropriately emphasises what pupils need to learn. Leaders and governors are clear about what exactly should improve, and by when.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders are regularly checking the quality of teaching. Crucially, they look carefully for the impact that teaching has on pupils’ learning and their progress. You and other leaders understand the strengths and weaknesses in teachers’ practice and work closely with teachers to help them to develop further. As a result, teaching has improved. You recognise that the quality of teaching is not consistently strong in all classes at all times.
p.2
Main findings
The improvements in teaching are evident in the 2017 test results, which are considerably better than the 2016 results. This stronger achievement is reflected in the progress of year groups across the school. In particular, more of the most able pupils are working at a higher standard. You are not complacent and understand that the broadly average progress overall achieved by last year’s leavers is a base upon which to build. Furthermore, you acknowledge the need to make sure leaders shine an even brighter light on the learning of the most able pupils, including those who may only have average prior attainment but are capable of achieving greater depth in their learning.
p.2
Main findings
The much improved assessment system helps leaders and teachers to keep a close eye on each pupil’s progress, as well as on the progress of groups, such as the disadvantaged and the most able. Leaders set suitably challenging pupil progress targets. You recognise that leaders need to look more often at the progress pupils have made over a longer period of time and not just in the current year, to make sure they are catching up where they may have previously fallen behind.
p.3
Main findings
You have acted upon the findings of the external pupil premium review and the advice of an external consultant. Leaders are now precisely identifying individual barriers to learning and watching the progress of disadvantaged pupils carefully.
p.3
Main findings
You have overhauled the way teachers teach mathematics. This is developing pupils’ ability to reason and explain their thinking. Pupils have daily opportunities to attempt mathematical problems that are more challenging. Teachers need to challenge the most able pupils further still with even trickier problems. Some gaps in conceptual understanding are still apparent for a few of the oldest pupils due to earlier, weaker teaching. A minority of pupils in Years 5 and 6 still have some way to go to catch up in their mathematics learning if they are to reach the expected standard before they leave the school this year and next.
p.3
Main findings
Governors have acted upon the recommendations of an external review of governance, taking a root and branch approach to improving the effectiveness of their work. As a result, governance has improved enormously. The governing body has a thorough understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in the school. Governors know, for example, in which year groups which subjects are weaker and in which they are stronger. They ask challenging questions and rightly expect leaders to bring about further improvements in pupils’ outcomes.
p.3
External support
Representatives of the local authority have helped you to sharpen the leadership skills of your team. They have made regular and thorough checks to ensure that the support they have given has been effective. The local authority recognises the many successes to which it has contributed, for example in the teaching of phonics in the early years and in Year 1, but is not complacent, understanding that there is plenty of scope for further improvements in pupils’ progress. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for North Yorkshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion