Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
8 Dec 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Paul Williams
- Postcode verified
BA2 5RF
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 951
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr Colin Cattanach Principal The Bath Studio School Frome Road Bath Somerset BA2 5RF
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 8 December 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2017. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders, governors and the trust are not taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection in order for the school to become a good school.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection I met with you, senior leaders, the chair of the local governing body and the chief executive officer of the Wellsway Multi-Academy Trust.
p.1
Evidence
I made short visits to lessons with you to talk with pupils and determine the quality of their work. I also scrutinised records relating to pupils’ attendance and pupils’ outcomes, and I evaluated the school’s action plans.
p.1
Context
Since the section 5 inspection, you have reorganised the roles in the senior leadership team to ensure a greater focus on pupils’ attendance. You have appointed a teacher with responsibility for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. You have recently begun to work with the principal of another school in the trust. She attends the school one day each week to provide support to improve the school.
p.2
Main findings
You and your senior team have set out to address all of the areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection. However, progress has not been sufficient in the key areas of pupils’ attendance, pupils’ outcomes in key stage 4 and governance.
p.2
Main findings
Since the inspection in April 2017, you have reorganised the monitoring of teaching, allocating more time to senior leaders to carry out this work. In the past, senior leaders were overgenerous in their judgements of teaching. Now there is a better link between leaders’ evaluation of the quality of teaching and the outcomes being achieved by pupils. However, there is more work to be done to make sure that senior leaders’ judgements are accurate.
p.2
Main findings
You are acutely aware of the need to improve rapidly the rate of pupils’ attendance. You have changed the allocation of roles in your senior team, making this area of work a high priority. There have been some successes with individual pupils, but the overall rate of attendance has not improved. A high proportion of pupils are persistently absent from school. Your senior team, and those teachers with responsibility for monitoring attendance, require further training to ensure that pupils’ attendance is accurately recorded.
p.2
Main findings
The governing body has been slow to react to the situation at the school. Governors are passionate about improving the achievement of pupils and they are committed to the founding vision of the school as a small institution with a distinctive curriculum. However, their ability to analyse assessment information and so understand the performance of different groups of pupils in the school has only recently begun to improve.
p.2
Main findings
You have high expectations of pupils. Most pupils are taking pride in their work. For example, in the creative and media BTEC programme pupils give great care and attention to produce art work to a high standard. In mathematics and English, pupils take care to present their work well. However, you acknowledge that more needs to be done to ensure that this happens consistently.
p.2
Main findings
You made your high expectations of behaviour clear to all pupils and students at the start of the academic year. The rate of fixed-term exclusions has fallen since September 2017.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders have developed a new system to assess pupils’ attainment and track their progress. You provide training for staff and so they have a good understanding of its use. Pupils are given suitably challenging targets and parents now receive more-detailed information about pupils’ achievements. It is too early to evaluate the impact of this work.
p.3
Main findings
Students in the sixth form continue to enjoy the specialist teaching they receive and the wealth of specialist equipment available to them. You are ensuring that more extra-curricular activities are available to all pupils and students. They are taking up these opportunities and so becoming more involved in the life of the school.
p.3
Main findings
Senior leaders with responsibility for English and mathematics are supported well by regular contact with specialist teachers in these subjects from the trust. As a result, teachers’ planning has improved and pupils are being given work which is appropriate to their abilities. However, pupils in key stage 4 have not yet overcome their previous underachievement.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted will carry out a further monitoring inspection and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The trust’s support for the school has not resulted in sufficient improvement in pupils’ outcomes or pupils’ attendance. The trust’s action plan for improving the school is fit for purpose; however, a number of the actions have not yet been implemented or their timing has slipped. A review of governance at the school has not yet taken place, nine months after it was recommended at the previous inspection.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the chair of the local governing body, the chief executive officer of the trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Bath and North East Somerset. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion