Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 16 Jan 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tim Williams (lead), Carolyn Dickinson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Carolyn Dickinson, Tim Williams

  • Postcode verified

    RM9 5QT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+23Mostly positivemore positive than 61% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyrobustconsistentlypositiveknowledgeablesafepromptly
Criticismconcernsexclusionsharmbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings708w+23
  • What needs to improve66w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
773
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 91%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Ms Janis Davies The Sydney Russell School Parsloes Avenue Dagenham Essex RM9 5QT

p.1

No formal designation inspection of The Sydney Russell School

Following my visit with Tim Williams, Ofsted Inspector, to your school on 14 December 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

No formal designation inspection of The Sydney Russell School

This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted’s published procedures for inspecting schools with no formal designation. The inspection was carried out because Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector was concerned about the effectiveness of safeguarding arrangements in the school.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors scrutinised the single central record of staff suitability checks and other documents relating to safeguarding and child protection arrangements. We met with the principal and senior leaders, including the designated safeguarding lead. We also met with the chair of the governing body, members of staff, and spoke on the telephone with a representative of the local authority’s safeguarding team.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors visited lessons across a range of subjects and year groups and spoke with pupils from all year groups both formally and informally. We scrutinised records in relation to attendance, exclusions and the management of reported incidents of bullying. Inspectors reviewed governors’ minutes, procedures relating to risk assessments and the handling of complaints. We considered responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and parent surveys conducted by the school.

p.1

Evidence

Having considered the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:

p.1

Context

Sydney Russell is a larger-than-average all-through school with 2,171 pupils on roll. In February 2015, the school converted to academy status, sponsored by the Partnership Learning Trust. The school is a national teaching school and runs a school-centred initial teacher training (SCITT) programme in partnership with St Angela’s Ursuline School in Newham.

p.2

Context

A larger-than-average number of pupils come from minority ethnic backgrounds. A third of pupils speak English as an additional language. Just under half of pupils are eligible for free school meals, which is higher than the national average. The proportion of pupils who have education, health and care plans is in line with the national average. The majority of these pupils receive support through the school’s resourced provision for pupils who have autistic spectrum disorder.

p.2

Context

Leaders and governors make certain that safeguarding and child protection measures are in place. Pupils’ safety and protection from harm are a constant priority. Leaders ensure that staff recruitment and record-keeping comply with statutory guidance. Staff are trained regularly on the latest guidance relating to safeguarding, including the ‘Prevent’ duty. Leaders with responsibility for safeguarding meet regularly and have robust systems in place to ensure that prompt referrals are made to external agencies. Records show that follow-up procedures are thorough and that pupils and families receive the appropriate support. The school undertakes appropriate risk assessments for trips and visits.

p.2

Context

Governors understand their responsibilities in relation to safeguarding. These include scrutinising the school’s safeguarding processes and the appointment of a link governor with responsibility for safeguarding. Minutes of governors’ meetings show that leaders regularly report safeguarding matters and that governors effectively hold leaders to account.

p.2

Context

Pupils who spoke to inspectors were consistently positive about the school’s focus on their safety and well-being. They know who to report to should they have any concerns, and recognise the different ways that the school offers support and guidance. Pupils are knowledgeable about how to keep themselves safe. The tutor programme, workshops, assembly and personal, social, health and economics (PSHE) education curriculum cover topics such as internet safety, gang and knife crime, radicalisation and extremism.

p.2

Context

Pupils report that bullying is rare. School records show that incidents of bullying are followed up promptly and that appropriate action is taken. Fixed-term exclusions are below the national average, and attendance for all groups of pupils is in line with, or in some instances higher than, national averages. Inspectors observed pupils moving between lessons and at break and lunchtimes. The school environment is orderly. However, some parts of the school have narrow corridors and at times there can be areas of congestion. Pupils reported to inspectors that these areas of congestion can lead to late arrival at lessons.

p.2

External support

School leaders work effectively with the local authority to prioritise pupils’ safety and well-being.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

 Ensure that all areas of the school are free from congestion so that pupils are able to arrive on time to lessons.

p.3

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the chief executive officer of the multi-academy trust, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Barking and Dagenham. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion