Schools & FE · School monitoring visit
Edgar Stammers Primary Academy
Summary
Kerrise James (lead), Marilyn Mottram
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Kerrise James, Marilyn Mottram
- Postcode verified
WS3 1RQ
- Name on report verified
Edgar Stammers Primary Academy
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils leaving the school at the end of Year 6 in 2017 had made very poor progress in reading from their different starting points during key stage 2. p.7
- This represents a legacy of underachievement and poor teaching. p.7
- Disadvantaged pupils have made very poor progress in recent years. p.8
- However, these changes are very new and disadvantaged pupils are still making poor progress across all subjects. p.8
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Increase the proportions of pupils at all stages, including the early years, who attain the highest standards by identifying all those pupils with the potential to do so, and ensuring that teachers set challenging work which requires them to think deeply. p.3
- An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.3
- Inspectors observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the headteacher and other leaders, including a local leader of education who is now working with the school. p.4
- Her Majesty’s Inspector met with the trust’s director of primary academies and the chair of the local governing body. p.4
- Meetings were also held with two groups of pupils. p.4
- Her Majesty’s Inspector spoke to parents at the end of the school day and joined a parent meeting led by the teacher with responsibility for pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities. p.4
- A range of documents were considered, including the school’s improvement plans, notes of visits from the multi-academy trust advisers and the school’s current information about pupils’ progress. p.4
- Since the last monitoring inspection, a local leader of education has started working with the school for three days a week. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 8
- Words of findings
- 2,395
- longer than usual (typical 1570)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs T Bunn Headteacher Edgar Stammers Primary Academy Harden Road Coalpool Walsall West Midlands WS3 1RQ
p.1
Academy
Following my visit with John Bates and Kerrise James, Ofsted Inspectors, to your academy on 5 to 6 December 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the academy’s previous monitoring inspection.
p.1
Academy
The inspection was the second monitoring inspection since the academy became subject to special measures following the inspection that took place in November 2016. The full list of the areas for improvement that were identified during that inspection is set out in the annex to this letter. The monitoring inspection report is attached.
p.1
Academy
Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time:
p.1
Academy
Leaders and managers are taking effective action towards the removal of special measures.
p.1
Academy
The academy’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.
p.1
Academy
Having considered all the evidence I strongly recommend that the academy does not seek to appoint newly qualified teachers.
p.1
Academy
I am copying this letter to the chair of the local academy board, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Walsall. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.1
The areas for improvement identified during the inspection that took
Improve the quality of teaching by ensuring that all teachers: – set work for pupils that is securely based on their prior knowledge and understanding – plan classroom activities which use time productively to maximise pupils’ learning – provide pupils with the opportunity to write in a range of contexts within different subject areas – require pupils to apply the knowledge and understanding they have acquired in new ways.
p.3
The areas for improvement identified during the inspection that took
Improve leadership and management by: – ensuring that leaders recognise in their planning and their allocation of resources the absolute priority of improving the quality of teaching – providing training and ongoing support for middle leaders to ensure that they are skilled and confident enough to fulfil their roles – making sure that key stage 2 teachers understand how to implement a clear school policy for the teaching of reading, and checking that they comply with it – developing a rich programme of teaching and activities to develop pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural awareness – establishing a more effective two-way communication with parents so that leaders are able to harness parents’ energies in improving attendance and supporting pupils’ learning.
p.3
The areas for improvement identified during the inspection that took
Increase the proportions of pupils at all stages, including the early years, who attain the highest standards by identifying all those pupils with the potential to do so, and ensuring that teachers set challenging work which requires them to think deeply.
p.3
The areas for improvement identified during the inspection that took
An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.3
Evidence
Inspectors observed the school’s work, scrutinised documents and met with the headteacher and other leaders, including a local leader of education who is now working with the school. Her Majesty’s Inspector met with the trust’s director of primary academies and the chair of the local governing body. Meetings were also held with two groups of pupils. Her Majesty’s Inspector spoke to parents at the end of the school day and joined a parent meeting led by the teacher with responsibility for pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities. A range of documents were considered, including the school’s improvement plans, notes of visits from the multi-academy trust advisers and the school’s current information about pupils’ progress.
p.4
Context
Since the last monitoring inspection, a local leader of education has started working with the school for three days a week. One new teacher joined the school in September. One former temporary teacher was appointed on a permanent basis from September. One teacher has left. The deputy headteacher has returned following maternity leave. The assistant headteacher has started maternity leave. A long-term supply teacher has been appointed to cover the assistant headteacher’s duties.
p.4
Context
This monitoring inspection focused particularly on pupils’ behaviour and how well the school meets the needs of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities.
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management
Since the last monitoring inspection, you have established an effective working partnership with a local leader of education from Featherstone Academy. Experienced staff from Featherstone are partnered with leaders and teachers at Edgar Stammers. This has increased the capacity of the leadership team and added new energy and drive to improve the quality of teaching. There is a climate of professional learning and pride in the school. Staff morale is high.
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management
Intensive programmes of support are in place for some teachers. These programmes include regular joint planning and team teaching with the local leader of education and staff from the partner school. This has led to some improvements in the quality of teaching. However, this is not consistently the case across all classes. Additionally, in Years 1 to 4, leaders are still managing some changes in staffing.
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management
Much work has been undertaken to improve the impact of middle leaders. External training and support is well tailored to their needs and areas of responsibility. They regularly visit Featherstone Academy to learn from effective leadership activities such as focused checks on pupils’ workbooks and classroom visits. They are clear about their accountabilities for driving improvements. There are signs that they are beginning to develop their skills. However, senior leaders recognise that they need to underpin this work with a full and strategic programme of monitoring and a timetable of activities.
p.4
The effectiveness of leadership and management
Since my last visit, leaders have introduced a new approach to collecting information about how well pupils are doing in reading, writing and mathematics. Teachers know how to use the system. Leaders are using this information to check the proportion of pupils who are working at the expected standards, or above, for their age. They are not yet using this information to check the progress that pupils make from their different starting points.
p.5
The effectiveness of leadership and management
The teacher with responsibility for leading reading knows the strengths and weaknesses in this area very well. She has introduced a number of new initiatives to support staff with checking pupils’ progress in reading. As a result, more pupils are reading appropriately challenging material. The staff have a clear understanding of the reading policy. The basic requirements for completing pupils’ reading records are established in every class.
p.5
The effectiveness of leadership and management
The special educational needs coordinator (SENCo) has built on the good work started last term. She has organised training for staff and provided a clear overview of the support that is in place for all pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. She is receiving an increased level of support from the trust. Teachers are clear about their responsibilities for supporting these pupils.
p.5
The effectiveness of leadership and management
Governors have a secure understanding of the issues facing the school. They have high expectations of the school’s leaders. They are keeping a close eye on the progress that the school is making towards the removal of special measures. They are using the milestones and targets set in the school’s action plan to check the school’s progress.
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment
Teachers have shared examples of pupils’ work with staff at Featherstone Academy. They have discussed the standards achieved by pupils and the next steps in learning. This has raised teachers’ expectations and given them confidence to assess accurately standards of pupils’ work and their progress. Work in pupils’ books shows that now more work is set that builds on what pupils already know, understand and can do. However, this remains variable across classes.
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment
There is some evidence that teachers are setting tasks that encourage pupils to use and apply their previous knowledge in different contexts. For example, during the inspection, Year 5 pupils were challenged to apply their previous learning to discuss figurative language when reading and discussing a new text. Pupils rose to the occasion. They freely and correctly used terms such as ‘metaphor’ and ‘onomatopoeia’ to describe their responses. They were required to think deeply and they demonstrated pride in their learning.
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment
These approaches are, however, inconsistent across the school. Teachers do not routinely provide opportunities for pupils to draw on what they already know and deepen their understanding. Work in pupils’ books and discussions with pupils show that there are still too few opportunities for pupils to reason mathematically or use their mathematical knowledge to solve practical problems. As a result, pupils are not required to recall and apply their mathematical knowledge rapidly and accurately, or to persevere and find ways of solving problems.
p.6
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment
The school’s new assessment system provides a clear picture of the proportions of pupils across the school who are working above the expected standards for their age in reading, writing and mathematics. This is a very recent development. Teachers are familiar with the system but are not yet using this information to plan future teaching and learning.
p.6
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment
Teachers are better informed about the needs of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. Individual pupil’s learning plans are in place. These are shared and regularly reviewed with the SENCo. Teachers value the joint planning with the SENCo and regular reviews of pupils’ learning and personal development. There are signs that tasks are better matched to the needs of most of these pupils. Leaders and staff recognise that further work is needed to continue improving support for these pupils.
p.6
Personal development, behaviour and welfare
Pupils are positive about the new behaviour policy which clearly sets out the behaviour expected of everyone. They say that there are still ‘times when some people let themselves down’ but that teachers deal with this fairly. It is pleasing to see that there is a positive climate around the school.
p.6
Personal development, behaviour and welfare
The ‘recognition boards’ in every classroom are used effectively by staff to promote positive attitudes. Even the youngest children talked easily to inspectors about their understanding of ‘respectful behaviour’. Their comments included ‘it means that you don’t snatch glue sticks’ and ‘it really means not shouting but listening and helping’. Staff use the school’s behaviour policy consistently and pupils understand and value the rewards and sanctions systems.
p.6
Personal development, behaviour and welfare
Those pupils who find it more difficult to manage their behaviour are supported by individual support plans. The SENCo is working closely with staff to ensure that these plans are working effectively. Leaders recognise that more needs to be done to sustain these changes and to encourage pupils’ self-discipline. Analysis of improvements to behaviour over time is in early stages. This will be a focus of the next monitoring inspection. The Year 6 leader has built successfully on some of the approaches introduced last term to develop pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural awareness. Attractive displays of pupils’ work around the school, such as ‘Democracy week’, are a testimony to this. During the inspection, Year 6 pupils were visiting the local mayor and participated in a question and answer session in the Mayor’s Parlour. They were proud of their contributions and demonstrated enthusiasm and positive attitudes to
p.6
Personal development, behaviour and welfare
learning. These activities are fostering a love of learning.
p.7
Personal development, behaviour and welfare
Leaders are working with local authority advisers to improve pupils’ attendance. Pupils understand the importance of attending school. They want to contribute towards class awards and demonstrate responsible attitudes towards this. There are signs that attendance is improving but it is still below the national average.
p.7
Personal development, behaviour and welfare
The school’s systems for checking the attendance of different groups lack detail. Some groups of pupils miss more sessions than others. The impact of this on pupils’ achievement is not checked carefully enough or shared with parents.
p.7
Personal development, behaviour and welfare
Parents who spoke to inspectors were positive about the changes at the school. They valued the meetings that the director of the trust held with them following the last monitoring inspection. They feel that communication between the school and parents is improving. This area for improvement will be a focus of the next monitoring inspection.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils
At the end of the Reception Year in 2017, the proportion of children achieving a good level of development continued to improve and was close to national figures. The early years leader is not complacent. She has undertaken an analysis of work from the previous year and devised plans to increase the proportion of children achieving a good level of development still further.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils
There is a buzz among the staff in Nursery and Reception and a spirit of professional learning. Children use the attractive learning environment freely to support their learning. They make at least average and often better than average progress from their different starting points.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils
In 2017, the proportion of pupils who achieved the expected standards in the Year 1 phonics screening check dipped and was below the national average. Leaders have quickly responded to this. They have arranged focused staff training and reorganised teaching groups. It is too early to show the impact of these changes on pupils’ progress in phonics.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils
In 2017, pupils’ outcomes at the end of key stage 1 remained particularly low in writing. Pupils leaving the school at the end of Year 6 in 2017 had made very poor progress in reading from their different starting points during key stage 2. This represents a legacy of underachievement and poor teaching. At the time of the inspection, leaders did not have information about the current progress of pupils. This aspect will be looked at during the next monitoring inspection.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils
Disadvantaged pupils have made very poor progress in recent years. Leaders are now responding to the recommendations made in the external review of the school’s use of pupil premium funding. Current plans to monitor the impact of funding and improve outcomes for this group of pupils are now more specific than in the past. A senior leader has recently taken on responsibility for this. She is supported by a member of the local governing body. However, these changes are very new and disadvantaged pupils are still making poor progress across all subjects. This aspect will be looked at during the next monitoring inspection.
p.8
Outcomes for pupils
The SENCo is keeping a careful check on the progress of each individual pupil receiving SEN support. It is pleasing to note that there are signs of improvement in the progress that these pupils are making in their learning and personal development.
p.8
External support
The trust responded swiftly to the recommendations from the previous monitoring inspection report. Effective action was taken to increase the level of support for the school. Intensive programmes of support for individual teachers were introduced immediately. Additional help from a local leader of education was organised swiftly to ensure that the school had capacity to honour the actions identified on the support programmes. The trust’s director for primary academies is closely monitoring the impact of this support.
p.8
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion