Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Stanley St Peters Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Inspected 7 Dec 2017 · published 12 Jan 2018 · URN 108247

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Brian Stillings (lead), Eve Morris, Linda Collier, Sara Roe

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Dec 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Brian Stillings, Eve Morris, Linda Collier, Sara Roe

  • Early years verified

    Requires improvement

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    WF3 4HS

  • Name on report verified

    Stanley St Peters Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

  • URN verified

    108247

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Early yearsRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+1Mixedmore positive than 28% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivepositiveenjoyhappyconsistentlypositivelyaccurateeffectively
Criticismrequires improvementnot consistentlyinconsistencieslackconcernsshortcomingsbelowtoo few

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings818w−11
  • Leadership103w+47
  • Safeguarding107w+25
  • What needs to improve2076w+1

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
3,100
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 21%Leadership 3%Safeguarding 3%What needs to improve 54%About the inspection 19%

Full report text

Stanley St Peters Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Lake Lock Road, Stanley, Wakefield, West Yorkshire WF3 4HS

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Early years provision Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Instability in leadership and the high turnover of staff have hampered the rate of the school’s improvement. As a result, the quality of teaching and pupils’ outcomes are not good, particularly in writing and mathematics.  Despite leaders’ determination to improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, inconsistencies exist across the school. As a result, the progress of middle-ability pupils, disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities requires improvement.  Children in the early years get off to a happy start to school life, but activities often lack purpose and assessment information is not used well enough to support them in making good progress.  Pupils do not have sufficient opportunities to develop their problem-solving skills in mathematics.  Subject leaders’ work is at an early stage of development. As a consequence, they have not

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

brought about significant improvements in the subjects that they lead.  Pupils’ attendance is consistently below the national average. This limits their overall progress.  Although pupils’ behaviour has shown some improvement, a number of pupils sometimes become disruptive and disengaged in class and around the school. Adults do not apply the agreed behaviour policy consistently.  Leaders’ engagement with parents and carers is developing. As a result, not all parents universally support the school. The school has the following strengths

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The headteacher, ably assisted by senior leaders, is very clear about what needs to improve. Leaders have begun to address shortcomings. However, not all actions have had a sustained and positive effect.  Governors are highly committed to the school. They now receive accurate information which enables them to challenge leaders effectively.  Leaders have created a positive culture of safeguarding. As a result, pupils are happy and safe in school.  The vast majority of pupils are friendly and well mannered. They are proud of their school and enjoy the ample opportunities to take part in school life. School, 6–7 December 2017

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the effectiveness of leadership and management by: – developing the role of middle leaders so that they contribute more widely in improving the outcomes of the subjects they lead – continuing to engage positively with parents who are less than satisfied with the school.  Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment, by ensuring that: – teaching is consistently good or better in all year groups – work set is sufficiently challenging to enable more pupils, especially middle-ability pupils, to achieve higher standards in writing and mathematics. – planned support helps pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities and those who are disadvantaged, to make good progress – pupils are given further opportunities to apply their mathematical skills to everyday problems.  Improve provision and leadership in the early years so that: – assessment is used more incisively to ensure that more children make better than

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

expected progress – children are appropriately challenged in activities.  Develop partnerships with parents to improve pupils’ attendance.  Improve pupils’ behaviour in lessons and breaktimes by ensuring that the school behaviour policy is consistently applied in all classes and by all members of staff. School, 6–7 December 2017

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Since her appointment in April 2016, the headteacher, senior leaders and governors have worked tirelessly to get an accurate view of the school and take steps to improve teaching and pupils’ outcomes. Actions taken by the school have started to demonstrate a visible effect on improving teaching and learning. However, the high turnover in staffing has meant that leaders have not been able to sustain consistent improvements. As a result, this has limited the impact of leaders’ actions.  Leaders are aware that further work is needed to improve the quality of teaching across the school, particularly in writing and mathematics. Recent training and changes made to improve the quality of teaching and pupils’ outcomes are not yet firmly embedded.  Subject leaders are at an early stage of their development in improving standards. Although they are determined to improve outcomes for pupils, they have not had

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

enough time to impact positively on eradicating inconsistencies in teaching.  Senior leaders’ use of the additional funding to support pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is mixed. There are some positive examples of effective support for pupils. Parents who spoke with an inspector appreciate the sensitive and effective support that their children receive. However, not all support is effective. As a result, the progress for several pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is not consistently good or helping many to catch up.  Senior leaders’ have developed focused plans to spend the additional funding for disadvantaged pupils. As a result, actions positively concentrate on what is required to improve progress for this group of pupils. However, while there are some promising signs of improvement, the impact of the actions taken are too early to measure.  The school’s work with parents is mixed. A significant number of parents who

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

responded to Ofsted’s online parent survey, Parent View, expressed concerns about the constant upheaval in staffing and weaknesses in communication, even though leaders have taken some positive steps to work with parents. Leaders recognise that more work is needed to positively engage with parents to bring more of them on board.  The school’s curriculum is broad and balanced. Pupils’ opportunities are being broadened by the use of outdoor learning. Pupils have worked cooperatively to transform an unused area of the school grounds into a wild outdoor classroom. This is helping to support pupils’ scientific knowledge and develop a caring attitude for wildlife. Pupils get ample opportunities to create well-crafted drawings, which are carefully displayed around the school.  Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is fostered well. Through regular assemblies and encouraging pupils’ understanding of the school’s values, pupils

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

learn about values such as respect and compassion. For example, a thought-provoking assembly helped pupils to develop compassion and respect for older people. Pupils also have a good knowledge of and show mutual respect for different faith groups. This prepares pupils well for life in modern Britain. School, 6–7 December 2017  Leaders make effective use of the physical education and sport premium funding. This has helped to provide bespoke support for teachers to improve their teaching of topics such as gymnastics. In addition, pupils enjoy the range of opportunities available to participate in a wide choice of sports during and after school.  Systems to manage staff performance are being sharpened. As a result, recent targets are challenging and helping to identify ways to support teachers to improve their teaching.  The responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire indicate that teachers are proud to work

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

at the school and hold their leaders in high regard.  Leaders have welcomed support and challenge from the local authority. The local authority accurately identified that the school required extra support and has had positive effect in helping to ensure that the school’s use of assessment is becoming increasingly accurate.

p.4

Governance of the school

 Governors are passionate about and share leaders’ ambitions for the school’s continual improvement. They have a clear view of the main issues facing the school. Governors have taken effective steps to ensure that the school is working towards developing high-quality leadership, secure more effective teaching and improve standards. They recognise the green shoots of improvement across the school.  Governors take their roles seriously. Many governors have gained valuable skills from attending training. The headteacher provides a wealth of accurate information. As a result, governors have started to use this effectively to reduce variations in teaching and pupils’ progress across the school.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Leaders have developed a strong culture of safeguarding among the school community.  Procedures for the recruitment and vetting of staff are effective. Leaders ensure that staff are suitable to work with children.  Leaders have ensured that staff access regular safeguarding training. As a result, staff are very vigilant and report concerns so that action can be taken when needed.  Pupils have ample opportunities to learn how to be safe. For example, younger pupils have a good understanding about topics such as stranger danger. Pupils are confident that an adult is available in school should any concerns arise.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement because not enough teaching has been good enough over time to ensure that pupils make good progress. The constant upheaval and turnover in staffing has led to pupils’ inconsistent rates of progress. School, 6–7 December 2017  Senior leaders have an accurate view of teaching across the school and can pinpoint where improvement is needed. Leaders have identified the support for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities and those who are disadvantaged are not making good progress from their starting points. Inspection evidence supports this view.  Staffing since September 2017 has begun to stabilise. As a result, the school’s thorough and detailed checks on teaching show that improvements are being made. The quality of teaching, while showing signs of improvement, is not consistently good. Leaders agree that there is a lack of consistency in quality between year groups and

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

subjects.  Teachers’ expectations in some lessons are not high enough and do not match the needs of pupils accurately. As a result, too many pupils are not challenged sufficiently and make the progress that they are capable of. When teachers’ expectations are low, some pupils, especially middle-ability pupils, lose focus and this impedes the progress they make.  Mathematics has been a focus in the school. Teachers ensure that pupils are secure in their calculation skills. However, some work is repetitive and this limits pupils’ progress. Until very recently, only the most able pupils have had the opportunity to apply their mathematical skills to develop their ideas and solve everyday problems.  Expectations for the standards of writing across the school are not consistently high. As a result, pupils’ careless errors in punctuation and spellings are sometimes overlooked, particularly for middle-ability pupils. The school is taking steps to ensure that quality

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

writing is encouraged and celebrated but this is at an early stage of development.  The school widely encourages the importance of regular reading. As a result, this has helped instil a love of reading in pupils. The new library has been effective in stimulating an interest in a wide range of reading books. Although younger pupils are developing effective strategies to read unfamiliar words, the teaching of phonics is not of a consistently high standard and impacts on the overall quality of pupils’ writing.  Most teaching assistants provide effective support for pupils, particularly lower-ability pupils. Timely support helps this group of pupils to achieve success in some lessons.  Homework is set regularly and in line with the school policy to support reading, spellings and mathematics. Most pupils enjoy the challenge of continuing learning at home. Older pupils enjoyed, for example, the challenge of making a gas mask when

p.5

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  Pupils have ample opportunities to develop responsibility in a number of roles across the school. The wide variety of roles as part of the children’s leadership team ensures that pupils have an active role in school. For example, older pupils enjoy the challenge when acting as play leaders organising games for younger pupils.   Pupils understand the different forms of bullying and say that instances of bullying are School, 6–7 December 2017 rare. Pupils are confident that any instances of bullying would be dealt with swiftly by an adult in the school.  Pupils are well taught about how to keep themselves online. They understand the needs to keep personal details safe and the danger of disclosing information to strangers.   Pupils gain a good understanding of what it means to lead a healthy lifestyle. Pupils can talk confidently of the need for a balanced diet and the harmful effects of eating

p.5

Personal development and welfare

too much sugar. Pupils can talk confidently about the need for regular exercise and enjoy the wide range of sports on offer. 

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils requires improvement.  In the main, pupils’ attitudes to learning are mostly positive and they enjoy coming to school. However, pupils in some classes become disengaged when teaching does not challenge and meet their needs.  Not all staff have high expectations for behaviour. Some staff do not consistently follow the school’s policy and strategies to encourage good behaviour. As a result, there are inconsistencies in how some staff address instances of low-level disruption in lessons.  Pupils generally behave well around the school. For example, where adults supervise and direct, pupils walk calmly and sensibly around school. In addition, older pupils conduct themselves well during assemblies.  However, some pupils find it harder to manage and maintain their behaviour during independent times. For example, some pupils act in a boisterous manner during breaktimes and do not keep to the school’s agreed approach for behaviour.

p.6

Behaviour

 Despite leaders’ best efforts, pupils’ attendance is below the national average and not improving rapidly enough. The bulk of absence is due to illnesses and families taking holidays during term time. Leaders’ work to improve attendance is starting to have some impact but this requires further improvement. The headteacher has taken steps to engage parents in developing a shared culture for promoting good attendance. She is well aware of the adverse impact on pupils’ progress when they are not attending school.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Pupils do not make consistently good progress from their individual starting points across the school. This reflects in the variances in the quality of teaching and the impact of high staff turnover.  Outcomes in mathematics and writing require improvement. Too few pupils, particularly middle ability and disadvantaged pupils, achieve the standards they are capable of. In 2017, at the end of key stage 2, pupils’ progress in mathematics was below average. Too few pupils achieved the higher standard. Leaders have taken steps to address this and ensure that pupils have more opportunities to apply their skills in solving more complex problems but it is too early to measure the impact. School, 6–7 December 2017  A legacy of weak teaching and previous inaccurate use of assessment have hindered the progress that pupils have made over time. As a result, pupils, especially in key stage 2, have had too much ground to make up from their lower starting points.

p.6

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 The most able pupils achieved in line with other pupils nationally at the expected standard, at the end of key stage 2 in 2017, in reading and writing. Leaders acknowledge that further work is needed to ensure that this group of pupils reach the standards they are capable of.   Unvalidated outcomes for 2017 at the end of key stage 1 show variability in outcomes and across subjects. Reading generally continued to show sustained success in ensuring that pupils achieve in line with the national average. The number of pupils achieving the expected standard in writing has been below average in 2016 and against the provisional figure in 2017. In mathematics, no pupils achieved the higher standard in 2017.  In 2017, the proportion of Year 1 pupils who achieved the expected standard in the phonics screening check dipped below the national average. Results were adversely affected by the constant changes in staffing.

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Disadvantaged pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics matched the averages found nationally at the end of key stage 2 in 2017. However, the number of disadvantaged pupils meeting the expected and higher standards in writing and mathematics has been below other pupils nationally in 2016 and the provisional figures in 2017.   Current progress information is becoming increasingly accurate. As a result, work in some pupils’ books shows improvement, but this is still too variable across the school. 

p.7

Early years provision Requires improvement

 Children enter the early years with skills and abilities that are typical for their age. Over time, the progress they have made has not been good enough to prepare them fully for the demands of Year 1.  The headteacher took on the leadership of the early years in 2016, having recognised the shortcomings, particularly in the accuracy of assessment and lack of teamwork between Nursery and Reception classes. The Nursery and Reception classes now work more closely together. This is helping to share mutual expectations among staff.  A new leader for the early years was appointed in September 2017. She has been quick to develop a team ethos and introduce improved systems to ensure that assessment becomes more accurate. However, the changes are embryonic and there has not been enough time to fully iron out the inconsistencies in teaching and assessment.  Following the disappointing outcomes in 2016, when fewer than half of children met

p.7

Early years provision Requires improvement

the good level of development, the number of children meeting this increased to 64% in 2017. While this shows a marked improvement, over time, children’s progress from their starting points has not been consistently good.  The small numbers of disadvantaged children and children with SEN and/or disabilities School, 6–7 December 2017 are making accelerated progress, but inspection evidence shows that this is not good.  Current teaching across the early years is improving but there is some inconsistency in the quality of activities that children take part in when working without an adult. While the activities are engaging, they sometimes lack purpose. During these times, adults miss opportunities to extend children’s learning through modelling the learning to be made and questioning effectively.  Children are happy and safe. Adults’ expectations for children’s behaviour ensure that they behave and concentrate well in all they do. For example, children enjoyed working

p.7

Early years provision Requires improvement

alongside each other and relished the challenge of counting penguins when learning outdoors.  Parents said that they appreciate the work of the early years team in ensuring that their children settle well and make a happy start to school life.  Welfare requirements are met. Staff are well trained in all aspects of keeping children safe in line with whole-school policies and current statutory guidance. As a result, they provide a caring environment, ensuring that children are safe and feel safe. School, 6–7 December 2017

p.8

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.9

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.9

School details

Email address office@stanleystpeters.co.uk

p.9

School details

Date of previous inspection 21–22 November 2012

p.9

Information about this school

 Stanley St Peters is larger than the average-sized primary school. There are two classes in most year groups except for Years 3 and 4, which has three classes.  The headteacher took up her post in April 2016.  The vast majority of pupils are White British.  The proportion of pupils supported by the pupil premium is broadly similar to the national average.  The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is above the national average.  The proportion of pupils with an education, health and care plan is below that nationally.  School, 6–7 December 2017  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics.  The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website. School, 6–7 December 2017

p.9

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed teaching and learning across the school. Several lessons were observed jointly with school leaders, including the headteacher and deputy headteachers.  Inspectors scrutinised a wide range of documentation, including the school development plan, school self-evaluation, data relating to attainment and progress, governors’ minutes, records about behaviour, safeguarding and attendance.  Meetings were held with the headteacher, deputy headteachers, staff, governors and a representative from the local authority.  Inspectors scrutinised the quality of work in pupils’ books, much of which was done alongside middle and senior leaders.  A group of Year 2 and Year 6 pupils shared their opinions about the school and their learning with an inspector.  An inspector listened to pupils read.  Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour and conduct at breaks and lunchtimes.  Inspectors took account of the 62 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent

p.11

Information about this inspection

View, in addition to the school’s own evaluation of responses to their parent questionnaire. Inspectors considered the 14 responses to Ofsted’s staff questionnaire and the 16 responses to Ofsted’s pupil questionnaire. An inspector met with parents at the beginning of the school day.

p.11

Inspection team

Brian Stillings, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.11

Inspection team

Linda Collier Ofsted Inspector School, 6–7 December 2017 guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.12

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.12

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.12

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.12

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.12

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion