Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

GORSE SCITT ITE Partnership

Inspected 19 Jun 2017 · published 9 Jan 2018

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Bernard Campbell (lead), Kathleen Harris OI

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    19 Jun 2017

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    Bernard Campbell, Kathleen Harris OI

  • Name on report verified

    GORSE SCITT ITE Partnership

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+78Very positivemore positive than 80% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh-qualitystrongoutstandingconsistentlyhigh expectationshigh qualityhighly effectivepositive
Criticisminadequateconcernsweaknessesrequires improvementdisruptiongapsnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings119w+25
  • What needs to improve1878w+84

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
1,971
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 37, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 4%What needs to improve 69%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

GORSE SCITT ITE Partnership Initial teacher education inspection report Inspection dates Stage 1: 19 June 2017 Stage 2: 20 November 2017

p.1

This inspection was carried out by Her Majesty’s Inspector and an Ofsted Inspector in accordance with the ‘Initial teacher education inspection handbook’. This handbook sets out the statutory basis and framework for initial teacher education (ITE) inspections in England from September 2015.

p.1

The inspection draws on evidence from within the ITE partnership to make judgements against all parts of the evaluation schedule. Inspectors focused on the overall effectiveness of the ITE partnership in securing high-quality outcomes for trainees.

p.1

Inspection judgements

Key to judgements: Grade 1 is outstanding; grade 2 is good; grade 3 is requires improvement; grade 4 is inadequate

p.1

Inspection judgements

Overall effectiveness How well does the partnership secure consistently high quality outcomes for trainees? The outcomes for trainees 1 The quality of training across the partnership The quality of leadership and management across the partnership ITE inspection report: GORSE SCITT November 2017

p.1

Information about the secondary partnership

 GORSE SCITT (school-centred initial teacher training) was created in September 2015. Initially, it was named the Leeds Teaching School Alliance SCITT. For two years prior to becoming a SCITT, the partnership provided School Direct training for a university.  In 2016/17, the secondary partnership comprised six secondary schools and a post-16 college in or around Leeds. In the current year, four more secondary schools have joined the partnership. Five of the providers are in the Gorse Academies Trust. Since 2017, the partnership has also collaborated with the White Rose Academies Trust.  In its first year, the partnership was also the SCITT provider for a teaching school alliance. This partnership did not continue into the second year by mutual consent.  In 2016/17, the partnership offered a non-salaried School Direct route into qualified teacher status in 17 subject specialisms. Trainees gain a postgraduate certificate in education (PGCE) and qualified teacher status

p.2

Information about the secondary partnership

(QTS). In September 2017, the SCITT changed the university that provides the PGCE course and award. The SCITT now works in partnership with the University of Sunderland. The partnership also offers an Assessment Only route for those with prior experience of teaching.  GORSE SCITT recruited 75 secondary trainees in its first year and 79 in the second. In the third and current year, which has just begun, there are 121 trainees, including for the first time, 12 primary-phase trainees.

p.2

Information about the secondary ITE inspection

 Two inspectors observed 12 trainees during stage 1 of the inspection and 12 newly qualified teachers (NQTs) at stage 2. At stage 1, inspectors observed the feedback given to trainees by subject mentors.  Over the course of the two-stage inspection, inspectors held meetings with trainees, NQTs, recently qualified SCITT trainees, subject leads, subject and professional mentors, principals, school and trust leaders with responsibility for training and professional development, and representatives of the governing and executive board.  Inspectors considered a wide range of documentation including: self- evaluation documents and improvement plans; course handbooks; trainees’ portfolios; quality assurance documents; and information on trainees’ attainment, completion and employment. Inspectors checked that the partnership was compliant with statutory requirements, including all ITT criteria.  Inspectors considered the 51 responses to Ofsted’s online trainee

p.2

Information about the secondary ITE inspection

questionnaire completed in 2017. ITE inspection report: GORSE SCITT November 2017

p.2

Inspection team

Bernard Campbell HMI (lead inspector) Kathleen Harris OI (assistant lead inspector)

p.3

Key strengths of the secondary partnership

 GORSE SCITT is making a significant and growing contribution to the supply of high-quality teachers to schools in Leeds and neighbouring areas. The SCITT is highly effective in meeting local teacher supply needs for subjects, new schools, schools in challenging circumstances and schools requiring improvement.  Leaders and governors of the SCITT and the leaders of partner schools and trusts are passionate about their shared mission to provide high-quality teachers, especially for disadvantaged pupils.  As a result of the excellent reputation of the SCITT’s training programme, recruitment of trainees increased markedly in September 2017 and a number of schools have made GORSE SCITT their sole provider of choice.  The quality of training and mentoring across the partnership is outstanding because it is led by highly expert leaders, subject leaders and teachers from outstanding urban schools.  Trainees develop their skills and knowledge rapidly and securely because

p.3

Key strengths of the secondary partnership

they learn methods that are used consistently by host teachers and mentors across the partnership. This enables trainees to successfully apply and hone their skills across contrasting school placements. This model prepares them exceptionally well to become NQTs in partnership schools and beyond.  In 2017, almost all trainees successfully completed and gained QTS. Most demonstrated excellent practice in the majority of the teachers’ standards and in all related to their personal and professional conduct. Almost all gained employment as NQTs.  Meticulous monitoring sustains the high quality and consistency of training and mentoring. Very effective communication and collaboration across the partnership reinforce the highly coherent approach to training and mentoring. The SCITT director and team are highly responsive to the needs of trainees and schools and are held in high regard. ITE inspection report: GORSE SCITT

p.3

The partnership should:

 ensure that high-quality training and outcomes are sustained as the SCITT grows in size and provides more NQTs for a larger number of schools, including primary schools  refine the analysis of data to enable leaders to more quickly identify and act on any emerging variations in patterns of attainment.

p.4

Inspection judgements

1. The overall impact of training on the quality of NQTs’ teaching is impressive. NQTs demonstrate high expectations of behaviour and learning. As a result, pupils of all abilities and backgrounds behave and learn well. Pupils regularly improve their written work. Trainees’ and NQTs’ pupils’ books demonstrate high standards of work and good progress.

p.4

Inspection judgements

2. Highly effective behaviour management training by teachers who are experts in dealing with challenging behaviour prepares trainees to tackle incidents of low- level disruption positively and assertively. Trainees learn to use school and trust policies and sanctions well. They become particularly skilled in using rewards to motivate and encourage pupils during lessons. NQTs’ authoritative classroom management, their positive relationships with classes and their confident lesson planning create an excellent climate for learning.

p.4

Inspection judgements

3. Trainees quickly learn to plan and teach effective lessons. Highly practical training provides trainees with well-defined building blocks that enable them to plan lessons and adopt the methods deployed by teachers and schools across the partnership. Trainees become highly competent in using the SCITT tools to identify obstacles to individual pupils’ progress and actions to overcome them. As a result, NQTs regularly apply strategies that match the personal needs and abilities of individual pupils in their class, including the disadvantaged.

p.4

Inspection judgements

4. Trainees learn to structure and focus teaching consistently well. They implement systematically the partnership approach to lessons and routinely ensure that pupils work individually and independently on a set timed task. As a result, NQTs lead purposeful lessons that consistently challenge pupils to apply and extend their learning in writing and in practical tasks.

p.4

Inspection judgements

5. Trainees develop a strong understanding of how to use assessment to promote learning. NQTs give constructive and personalised feedback to individual pupils during independent learning tasks. Trainees use the partnership’s approaches to written feedback effectively. As a result, NQTs successfully prompt pupils to correct and extend their written responses and deepen their understanding. ITE inspection report: GORSE SCITT November 2017 6. Responses to the trainee online questionnaire were highly positive about all aspects of the training. Trainees and NQTs told inspectors that it had been a privilege to train with the SCITT and to learn on the job with expert teachers.

p.4

Inspection judgements

7. One of the secondary schools in the partnership opened in 2014 and has recruited a significant proportion of its new teachers from GORSE SCITT. Ofsted recently judged this school as outstanding because high expectations and the highly personalised approach to teaching enable all groups of pupils to make rapid progress. These features are clearly evident in the training and practice of the SCITT’s trainees and NQTs.

p.5

Inspection judgements

8. In 2017, completion and employment rates were well above the 2016 national averages. This represented an improvement on 2016, when completion and employment rates were average. In 2016, there were no significant variations in the completion rates by gender, ethnicity or age. In 2017, all groups had higher rates of completion than the 2016 group averages. The SCITT has established a vital artery for the supply of high-quality trainees to partnership schools. In 2017, almost three quarters of trainees gained posts as NQTs in partnership secondary schools.

p.5

Inspection judgements

9. The SCITT’s highly successful apprenticeship model of mentoring enables trainees to take full responsibility for leading teaching and learning incrementally over the course of the programme. Mentors plan and work alongside trainees to great effect. They actively support individual pupils’ progress at the same time as guiding the trainee in the classroom. Trainees rightly praise the high quality and consistency of mentoring by professional subject mentors and host teachers. Mentors recognise trainees’ different starting points and support them well in developing their confidence and skill.

p.5

Inspection judgements

10. Professional and subject mentors and host teachers receive regular training in the SCITT’s mentoring model. As a result, expectations are clear and mentors apply SCITT procedures consistently and with shared purpose. The SCITT central team checks on the quality of mentors’ work thoroughly through regular joint observations.

p.5

Inspection judgements

11. Mentors summarise their detailed feedback and practical advice to trainees in precise weekly targets. These enable trainees to develop their classroom management and subject teaching rapidly in incremental steps. Trainees systematically review and document their evidence of pupils’ progress to evaluate the impact of their planning and teaching. The SCITT mentoring procedures successfully promote trainees’ highly reflective approach to their professional development.

p.5

Inspection judgements

12. The weekly email from each trainee to the SCITT about what they have done, including a check on their progress and well-being, provides a comprehensive and early alert to any emerging issues. The SCITT deals with any concerns ITE inspection report: GORSE SCITT November 2017 quickly and effectively. Trainees, mentors and school leaders are highly gratified by the SCITT team’s constructive and flexible response to feedback about procedures, paperwork, the training programme and any workload issues.

p.5

Inspection judgements

13. Mentors at the end of one placement meet the mentors before the next placement to discuss the relative strengths and weaknesses of trainees against the standards. As a result, the transition between placements is seamless and enables trainees to rapidly move towards higher attainment in relation to the teachers’ standards.

p.6

Inspection judgements

14. Assessment of trainees is rigorous and accurate, and checked thoroughly by partnership leaders. Leaders have clarified the SCITT’s grading system for formative and final assessment so that definitions and procedures are crystal clear. Leaders are scrupulous in checking the procedures and accuracy of the assessment of Assessment Only candidates. The few Assessment Only candidates were successful and are in subject leadership positions in their schools.

p.6

Inspection judgements

15. The executive board and governors are well informed about the progress trainees make across the partnership and about the actions to support those making slower progress. They check examples of first-hand evidence to corroborate the SCITT director’s verbal reports.

p.6

Inspection judgements

16. SCITT leaders’ analysis of attainment grades has not been clear and comprehensive enough to interrogate emerging variations between male and female trainees. Leaders recognise the need to refine data analysis as the number of trainees grows.

p.6

Inspection judgements

17. Subject leads’ high level of expertise across all subjects provides trainees with relevant and up-to-date guidance about methods and resources for teaching, the curriculum and assessment at key stages 3 to 5. Subject leads draw on deep subject knowledge as post-16 teachers, as examiners, or as active members of local and national subject networks. They use subject audits to identify trainees’ gaps in knowledge accurately, and leaders adjust the training programme accordingly. Trainees express high praise for the quality and relevance of subject training. The recently improved virtual learning environment provides trainees with user-friendly access and effective signposting to relevant resources.

p.6

Inspection judgements

18. The SCITT has recently formalised and enhanced the role of subject leads by paying schools for some of their time. This has increased their status and impact. They are now leading and managing subject training across the partnership and developing subject knowledge enhancement for prospective trainees. The development of the subject lead role has strengthened leadership capacity for the current and future expansion of the SCITT. ITE inspection report: GORSE SCITT November 2017 19. Trainees benefit greatly from their placement at the SCITT’s post-16 provider. They acquire good knowledge of the post-16 curriculum in their subject. More broadly, all trainees develop a good understanding of post-16 teaching and the expectations of post-16 learners. This provides a strong foundation for NQTs who are now teaching post-16 courses.

p.6

Inspection judgements

20. Trainees’ placements in a primary and a special school had a memorable and positive impact on their awareness and understanding of teaching strategies that meet the needs of primary pupils and those who have special educational needs and/or disabilities.

p.7

Inspection judgements

21. As a result of effective training, trainees and NQTs are confident in creating opportunities for pupils to apply their literacy and numeracy skills to extend their understanding of subject terminology, to explain and analyse in writing, and to calculate and use graphs in different subjects.

p.7

Inspection judgements

22. The SCITT is highly committed to monitoring and supporting trainees in their continuing development as NQTs. School leaders welcome the continued support from the SCITT as trainees make the transition to NQT.

p.7

Inspection judgements

23. Partner schools are actively involved in the recruitment process and ensure that trainees have appropriate qualifications, strong subject knowledge and an aptitude for teaching. Senior and subject leaders make a significant contribution to the training programme. Leaders from partner schools influence the strategic direction.

p.7

Inspection judgements

24. Trainees gain valuable experience in schools in varying degrees of challenging circumstances and in schools judged to require improvement. Schools in the partnership that currently require improvement place a high value on their relationship with the SCITT and the supply of high-quality NQTs it provides.

p.7

Inspection judgements

25. Trainees contribute well to a wide range of extra-curricular activities. Trainees and NQTs are highly reflective about their professional responsibilities and exhibit high standards of personal and professional conduct.

p.7

Inspection judgements

26. Very effective systems and procedures are in place to ensure compliance with the ITT criteria and other statutory requirements relating to equality and diversity, eliminating discrimination, and safeguarding, including e-safety. Trainees and NQTs use their safeguarding training well and know how to communicate any concerns. They are aware of the steps to take to minimise risks related to the use of technology and social media, both for pupils and themselves. ITE inspection report: GORSE SCITT November 2017

p.7

Annex: Partnership schools

The following schools were visited to observe trainees’ and NQTs’ teaching:

p.8

Annex: Partnership schools

Bruntcliffe Academy, Leeds Cockburn School, Leeds Leeds West Academy Leeds The Farnley Academy, Leeds The Morley Academy, Leeds The Ruth Gorse Academy, Leeds Whitcliffe Mount School, Cleckheaton ITE inspection report: GORSE SCITT November 2017

p.8

ITE partnership details

Unique reference number Inspection number Inspection dates Stage 1 Stage 2 Lead inspector Type of ITE partnership Phases provided Date of previous inspection Previous inspection report

p.9

ITE partnership details

Provider address 19–21 June 2017 20–22 November 2017 Bernard Campbell HMI SCITT Secondary N/A N/A

p.9

ITE partnership details

The Morley Academy Fountain Street Morley Leeds LS27 0PD ITE inspection report: GORSE SCITT November 2017 regulates and inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format

p.9

ITE partnership details

or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.10

ITE partnership details

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.10

ITE partnership details

T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion