Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
8 Dec 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Gary Holden
- Postcode verified
SP10 4BS
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 968
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 50, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Hywel Inglis Acting Headteacher Knight’s Enham Junior School King Arthur’s Way Andover Hampshire SP10 4BS
p.1
Junior School
Following my visit to your school on 8 December 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Junior School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in July 2016. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Junior School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order for the school to become good.
p.1
Junior School
The school should take further action to:
p.1
Junior School
eliminate inconsistencies in the quality of teaching, learning and assessment by ensuring that all teachers share the same high expectations for pupils’ progress ensure that more pupils achieve scores at greater depth in national tests in reading, writing and mathematics.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, I discussed the school’s progress since the last inspection with you and the acting deputy headteacher, and I scrutinised various documents that you provided for me. You and the deputy headteacher accompanied me on a tour of the school, in which we observed learning in all year groups. I met with a group of pupils and I also spoke with parents at the start of the day. I had a meeting with subject leaders for English and mathematics. In addition, I met with the chair and vice-chair of the governing body and spoke on the telephone to the local authority officer linked to the school. I checked the single central record and reviewed a small sample of pupils’ work.
p.2
Main findings
You have taken a measured and methodical approach to addressing the recommendations made at the previous inspection. You have rightly made improving pupils’ outcomes across the school a high priority. Provisional outcomes for 2017 suggest that pupils’ progress from their various starting points has improved compared with the previous year, and is now broadly average. However, you have also correctly identified that too few pupils achieved scores at greater depth.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers are now held to account more rigorously for the progress their pupils make. Subject leaders for English and mathematics play an important role in this process. They work with teachers to ensure that the school’s agreed approaches to the teaching of English and mathematics are implemented. Consequently, teachers have higher expectations of what their pupils can achieve. Pupils make more rapid progress overall, and their attainment at the expected standard in reading and mathematics, in 2017, was above national averages. However, your own records show that some current pupils are not making the progress of which they are capable. This is because the quality of teaching, learning and assessment is not yet consistently strong in every year group.
p.2
Main findings
After the previous inspection, you worked with the local authority to carry out a review of the impact of the school’s use pupil premium funding on outcomes for disadvantaged pupils. Following this review, you have improved the way that teachers plan for, and meet the needs of disadvantaged pupils. In addition, you have sharpened your analysis of the barriers to learning that these pupils face. Governors now track disadvantaged pupils’ progress carefully and ask challenging questions about how the pupil premium is spent. Consequently, the differences between outcomes for disadvantaged pupils and other pupils nationally are diminishing, in particular in writing and mathematics.
p.2
Main findings
You have put in place effective systems for tracking and recording behaviour incidents. There are now clear rewards and sanctions in place that are linked to the school’s ‘Knight’s Code’. Pupils know and understand these rules. They behave well in class and in the playground. They are polite to their teachers, and they have very positive attitudes to learning. One pupil said, ‘In our school, we roll up our sleeves and never give up!’
p.2
Main findings
At the previous inspection, the curriculum was judged to be too narrow. You have ensured that the curriculum is now appropriately broad and balanced. Pupils speak with enthusiasm about their learning. Pupils also enjoy a wide range of interesting clubs and visits. You have rightly given reading a high profile. Pupils read every day and the bright, attractive library is used well.
p.3
Main findings
Working with governors, you have created a comprehensive school improvement plan that tackles the right issues in the right order and which sets ambitious targets. Helpful milestones enable you to check progress against this plan, at regular intervals. However, the milestones do not always lend themselves to accurate measurement and would benefit from further sharpening.
p.3
Main findings
Following the review of governance carried out after the previous inspection, governors have made sensible changes to the way they work. The governing body’s new curriculum and standards committee focuses sharply on teaching, learning and outcomes. Governors have also improved the quality of questioning and challenge they provide to leaders. As a result, governors have a strong strategic overview of all aspects of the school’s work.
p.3
External support
Last year, the school benefited from intensive support for teaching and leadership from several local authority advisers. In addition, a consultant headteacher worked alongside you to help put in place sustainable approaches to leadership. The local teaching school provided strong support for subject leaders.
p.3
External support
Since September, this high level of support has been scaled down significantly in recognition of the growing strength of the school.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hampshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion