Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Duke of Norfolk CofE Primary School
Summary
Peter Stonier (lead), Benetia Mounsey, Dorothy Stenson, Lynda Florence
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
24 Nov 2017
- Inspectors verified
Benetia Mounsey, Dorothy Stenson, Lynda Florence, Peter Stonier
- Early years verified
Requires improvement
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
SK13 7RD
- Name on report verified
Duke of Norfolk CofE Primary School
- URN verified
112868
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Increase the progress of children in the early years by: – ensuring that staff assess children consistently – ensuring that the staff use the information from assessments to plan activities that challenge children, particularly the most able, effectively, in order to develop their skills and understanding. p.2
- Improve the quality of leadership and management by ensuring that: – improvement plans provide governors with clear criteria for checking on whether planned improvements have taken place and have had a positive impact or not p.2
- An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. p.2
- Leaders do not have a secure enough understanding of pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics. p.3
- As a result, governors cannot currently hold the headteacher to account for the progress of pupils, including different groups of pupils, across the school. p.3
- Leaders at all levels do not write concise enough development plans. p.3
- Consequently, governors cannot hold leaders stringently to account for the actions taken in leaders’ areas of responsibility. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,883
- about usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Duke of Norfolk CofE Primary School Royle Avenue, Glossop, Derbyshire SK13 7RD
p.1
Overall effectiveness Requires improvement
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
p.1
Early years provision Requires improvement
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a school that requires improvement
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Leaders do not track closely enough the progress of pupils in reading, writing and mathematics. Leaders and governors do not know how individual and different groups of pupils, including disadvantaged pupils, are progressing over time. Governors have not challenged the school’s leaders over the recent decline in pupils’ progress by the end of key stage 2. Despite strong attainment, too many pupils have not made the progress of which they are capable. Leaders do not write precise enough plans for their areas of responsibility. Governors cannot, therefore, hold leaders to account for their actions. Leaders have not received appropriate training and support to help them carry out their roles effectively. Teachers do not give pupils opportunities frequently enough to write at length in subjects across the curriculum. Teachers do not move pupils quickly enough onto more challenging work in mathematics.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The quality of teaching, learning and assessment has declined since the previous inspection. The staff have insufficient opportunities to learn from each other and from colleagues in other schools. Adults in the early years do not assess children well enough to be able to plan precise next steps in children’s learning. The most able children, in particular, do not make as much progress as they should.
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
Pupils’ conduct is good. They are polite and behave well in classrooms, corridors and when playing outside. Pupils experience a broad and balanced curriculum, with a good mixture of extra-curricular activities. The activities include residential visits, music and sporting opportunities. Pupils’ attendance is good. Rates of attendance are above the national average. Rates of persistent absence are below the national average. The majority of parents hold a positive view of the school. They report that their children are happy, safe and cared for well.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching, learning and assessment and improve rates of progress, particularly in mathematics, by: – ensuring that checks on pupils’ progress support pupils in making consistently good progress – providing pupils with tasks which consistently challenge them to make the best possible progress – providing pupils with increased opportunities to write at length in subjects across the curriculum. Increase the progress of children in the early years by: – ensuring that staff assess children consistently – ensuring that the staff use the information from assessments to plan activities that challenge children, particularly the most able, effectively, in order to develop their skills and understanding. Improve the quality of leadership and management by ensuring that: – improvement plans provide governors with clear criteria for checking on whether planned improvements have taken place and have had a positive impact or not
p.2
What does the school need to do to improve further?
– leaders receive the necessary training and support to carry out their roles effectively – governors improve their understanding of the progress that the pupils make, in order to hold leaders stringently to account for the achievement of all pupils in reading, writing and mathematics. An external review of the school’s use of the pupil premium should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved. An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and management may be improved.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Leaders do not have a secure enough understanding of pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics. As a result, governors cannot currently hold the headteacher to account for the progress of pupils, including different groups of pupils, across the school. Leaders at all levels do not write concise enough development plans. Consequently, governors cannot hold leaders stringently to account for the actions taken in leaders’ areas of responsibility. Middle leaders have not received sufficient training and professional development in order to be able to carry out their responsibilities effectively. The headteacher does not check on the impact of their actions closely enough. Consequently, leaders cannot be sure if their plans and actions are making a difference to pupils’ outcomes. Leaders and governors have not ensured that the pupil premium funding is allocated and monitored effectively. For example, they are unclear about the provision for the
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
most able disadvantaged pupils and how the extra funding is accelerating their progress. Leaders do not use performance management effectively to hold teachers to account for the progress of pupils in their classes. As a result, teachers focus too heavily on the proportions of pupils who are working at age-related expectations. There are limited opportunities for teachers to develop professionally. Consequently, staff do not have up-to-date knowledge of recent educational developments. Leaders have ensured that there is a broad and balanced curriculum. Pupils have the opportunity to develop knowledge and skills in a wide range of subjects, including science, music and art. Pupils enjoy taking part in homework activities that help to deepen their knowledge and understanding of different topics. For example, models of Viking longboats are proudly on display outside the Years 5 and 6 classes. Leaders have ensured that pupils are knowledgeable about faiths and cultures that are
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
different from their own. They have a good understanding of British values. Pupils are, therefore, well prepared for life in modern Britain. The leader responsible for pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities knows each pupil’s needs well. Additional support programmes are matched well to pupils’ needs and monitored frequently to ensure that they are effective. The school has good links with outside agencies and there is a trained teaching assistant at the school, specialising in speech and language therapy. Consequently, these pupils are progressing well. The leader responsible for the physical education and sport funding has successfully provided pupils with a wide variety of sporting opportunities and after-school activities. For example, the Years 3 and 4 pupils are the current local gymnastics champions. Parents are strongly of the view that pupils are happy, safe and well looked after at
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement
Duke of Norfolk School. For example, one parent commented that ‘the school is a friendly, bright and warm place of learning’. The vast majority of parents who have expressed a view would recommend the school to another parent.
p.3
Governance of the school
Governors have not held leaders fully to account for the progress of pupils. They have not challenged leaders effectively enough regarding the recent slow progress of pupils during their time in key stage 2. Governors have not been able to monitor adequately the impact of leaders’ school development plans. This is because the plans do not contain enough detail to enable governors to check on what is working and what is not. Consequently, governors do not have a clear overview of all aspects of the school’s work. The governing body has a good mix of skills and experience. Governors make visits to school in order to check on, for example, the provision for the pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. The visits are recorded formally and shared with other governors at meetings, thereby keeping them up to date with developments.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. There is a strong safeguarding culture in the school. All necessary checks on adults are undertaken before they are allowed to work or to volunteer at the school. The headteacher has ensured that all staff have received the necessary safeguarding training, including on the ‘Prevent’ duty. Consequently, staff are aware of local issues that may expose pupils to the dangers of radicalisation or extremism. The system for staff to report any welfare concerns regarding a child is effective. The well-trained designated leads ensure that any pupil or family who requires extra support from an outside agency receives it promptly. Leaders understand the importance of keeping records in a good order.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Teachers do not accurately measure or track the progress of pupils in reading, writing and mathematics. They are not clear about how much progress individual pupils and groups of pupils are making over time. Consequently, the work given to pupils is not matched to their needs. Teachers do not always move pupils on to more challenging work quickly enough, particularly in mathematics. Consequently, from their various starting points, pupils do not make the progress of which they are capable. The quality of teaching across key stage 2 is inconsistent. For example, current assessment information provided by the school shows that pupils in Years 3 and 4 make slower progress than those pupils in Years 5 and 6. This is because pupils are not suitably challenged, especially in mathematics. Teachers do not give pupils enough opportunities to write at length in subjects across the curriculum. Consequently, pupils’ skills in punctuation, grammar and spelling are
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
not sufficiently well developed. Teaching assistants are used effectively to deepen pupils’ learning by asking challenging questions. They ensure that pupils have opportunities to complete some activities without adult supervision, thereby promoting the pupils’ independence. Phonics is taught well. Pupils have the opportunity daily to practise saying and writing different letter sounds. For example, pupils in the Year 1 class enjoyed the opportunity to explore the ‘air’ sound. They confidently and accurately wrote down the words chair and fair. Pupils enjoy reading and do so frequently. Pupils across the school have books at the appropriate level of challenge for their age and ability. Pupils in Years 1 and 2 use phonics skills to decode unfamiliar words. Pupils in Year 6 report that they can choose from a variety of books in the well-stocked library. Their favourite authors include Roald Dahl and Cressida Cowell.
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement
Teachers follow the school’s marking and feedback policy consistently across the curriculum. Consequently, pupils understand what they need to do to in order to improve. The learning environment is bright and stimulating throughout the school. The Years 5 and 6 classes, in particular, contain useful resources to help pupils learn. These include mathematical vocabulary, spelling rules and good examples of handwriting.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils are confident and self-assured. They are successful learners who understand the importance of resilience when they are faced with learning something new. Relationships between adults and pupils are positive. Pupils respond quickly to adults’ instructions. This ensures that lessons flow smoothly and without interruption. The school’s values of joy, respect, responsibility and honesty are known well to, and used by, pupils. These values are displayed proudly around the school and referred to frequently in whole-school assemblies. Pupils have a very good understanding of social diversity. For example, pupils write frequently to, and meet with, pupils from a multicultural, inner city school in Manchester. The school is working towards becoming ‘Stonewall Champions’. Consequently, pupils are developing their understanding of homophobic and
p.5
Personal development and welfare
transphobic bullying. As one pupil told an inspector, ‘We welcome anyone into this school.’ They are knowledgeable about faiths and cultures different from their own. Pupils understand how to keep themselves safe when online, on their bicycles and when crossing the road. Pupils are prepared well for life in modern Britain. Pupils enjoy the responsibility of being elected as school council and ‘eco-club’ members. Council members have recently been instrumental in raising funds for charities. The eco-club has gained Green Flag status for the school, in recognition of club members’ work to make the school more environmentally friendly. Pupils relish the opportunity to take part in school visits. Year 6 pupils spoke enthusiastically about a recent outdoor and adventurous residential visit to Robin Wood. Pupils in other year groups have recently visited the Yorkshire Sculpture Park and the Manchester Museum to support their learning about the Egyptians in a history
p.5
Personal development and welfare
topic. Pupils take part in a variety of extra school activities, including gymnastics, multi- sports, choir and Christian club. Parents value the early morning breakfast club. There are a good range of suitable and safe activities for pupils to complete, in addition to them enjoying a healthy breakfast. Consequently, the pupils feel ready to start their day.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils behave well in classrooms, corridors, at lunch and when playing outside at breaktimes. Pupils report that instances of poor behaviour and bullying are extremely rare. Pupils value assembly times, arriving in a sensible and orderly manner and settling quickly. They listen appreciatively to others, such as to a pupil playing the piano, and celebrate sensibly with other pupils who have achieved particularly well during the week. Pupils enjoy receiving ‘house points’ for working well and displaying the school’s values. At the end of every term, the winning house is rewarded with a non-uniform day. This motivates pupils to behave well and to become responsible citizens. Pupils are happy, polite and respectful of visitors. They wait in doorways and corridors, allowing adults to pass. They greet adults cheerily during the day. The systems to monitor the absence of pupils are strong and effective. Over recent
p.6
Behaviour
years, rates of attendance have been above the national average. Rates of persistent absence have been below the national average. Any pupil whose attendance drops is identified quickly. These pupils and their families are given the required support to ensure that the pupils’ attendance improves.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
In key stage 2, in 2016 and 2017, too few pupils made adequate progress in reading and writing. This included pupils who were disadvantaged and who had SEN and/or disabilities. Progress in reading declined in 2017. Inspection evidence, including work seen in pupils’ books, shows that too few disadvantaged pupils are currently making good progress from their various starting points in reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils are not challenged sufficiently in writing and mathematics. They are often given work that is too easy for them and are not moved on to challenging work quickly enough. Consequently, they do not make progress fast enough. Pupils make faster progress in Years 5 and 6. Assessment information provided by the school shows that large proportions of current pupils are working at age-related expectations in reading, writing and mathematics in Years 5 and 6. Lower proportions of pupils are working at age-related expectations in Years 3 and 4. Their progress is
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement
not as rapid as it should be. In 2017, the proportion of pupils leaving key stage 2 who achieved the expected standards in reading and writing was in line with the national average. The proportion of pupils who achieved at the expected standard in mathematics was above the national average. In 2017, the proportion of pupils leaving key stage 1 who achieved the expected standard in reading, writing and mathematics was in line with the national average. The proportion of pupils leaving key stage 1 who achieved at a greater depth in reading, writing and mathematics was also in line with the national average. In 2016 and 2017, the proportion of pupils who achieved the expected standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check was higher than the national average.
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
Adults do not assess children’s achievement precisely enough. Consequently, teachers do not plan for next steps in children’s learning accurately. Children, particularly the most able, do not make the progress of which they are capable. Changes to the leadership of the early years have meant that the systems to identify children who are underachieving are not working well. Staff are not able to recognise the gaps in children’s knowledge and, therefore, cannot take action to tackle them. Observations of children’s learning show that children who are currently in the early years are not making consistently good progress. Children enter the early years with knowledge and skills that are broadly typical and, sometimes, above those typical for their age. In 2016 and 2017, the proportion of children achieving a good level of development was above the national average. These children were therefore well prepared for life in Year 1.
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
Children’s transition into the Reception classes is good. Parents and children have frequent opportunities to visit the school in the summer term. The early years leader visits children in their Nursery setting and Nursery staff visit the school. This ensures that children are well known to adults before they start and so they settle quickly. The early years has positive links with outside agencies who support children’s welfare, such as the multi-agency team from the local authority. As a result, children who require extra support receive it swiftly. Parents enjoy frequent contact with staff. This enables them to discuss any queries regarding their children’s education. Parents complete daily phonics sheets with their children to help develop early reading skills. Relationships between adults and children are positive. Well-established routines enable children to move sensibly between different activities. Children behave well and
p.7
Early years provision Requires improvement
share resources sensibly and respectfully. Where the activities closely match children’s abilities, the children show sustained concentration. For example, a group of boys were particularly engrossed in recognising numbers to 10 on hand-held tablets. Safeguarding is effective and statutory duties are met. Staff have had appropriate safeguarding training and are aware of the procedures that are in place to report any welfare concerns they have about a child. Parents who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, were positive about their children’s education in the early years. One said, for example, ‘My child cried on Saturday, when she realised there was no school!’
p.8
School details
This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.
p.9
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.9
School details
Email address info@dukenorfolk.derbyshire.sch.uk
p.9
School details
Date of previous inspection 11 12 December 2012
p.9
Information about this school
The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website. The school is larger than the average-sized primary school. The proportions of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds and who speak English as an additional language are much lower than average. The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is lower than average. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is below average. In 2017, the school met the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ progress in English and mathematics by the end of Year 6.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed lessons in all classes, sometimes jointly with the headteacher and deputy headteacher. Inspectors examined a wide variety of pupils’ books from a range of subjects. Inspectors held a range of meetings with the headteacher, subject and other leaders, a group of governors including the chair of the governing body, and a representative from the local authority. Inspectors spoke with pupils in groups, in lessons and around the school, and listened to them reading. Inspectors observed pupils’ behaviour in classrooms, around the school and at breaktimes and lunch times. Inspectors scrutinised a range of documents, including minutes of governing body meetings, current assessment information provided by the school, the school development plan and self-evaluation, and records relating to safeguarding. Inspectors talked with parents before school and examined 38 responses to Parent
p.10
Information about this inspection
View. There were 0 and 14 responses to the Ofsted pupil and staff surveys respectively.
p.10
Inspection team
Peter Stonier, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Lynda Florence Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion