Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Christ Church (Church of England) Junior School
Summary
Lynda Townsend (lead), Ian Beardmore
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Dec 2017
- Inspectors verified
Ian Beardmore, Lynda Townsend
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Outcomes verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Good
- Postcode verified
WV6 8LG
- Name on report verified
Christ Church (Church of England) Junior School
- URN verified
104366
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
- OutcomesGood
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- One parent expressed the views of many when they wrote, ‘The ethos of the school makes it an excellent place for children to learn in a safe and caring environment!’ p.3
- The school has rigorously addressed these issues, and evidence from unvalidated 2017 statutory assessment data, work in pupils’ books and the school’s own tracking data show clearly that current pupils are now making consistently good progress in English and mathematics, as well as in other subjects across the curriculum. p.6
- They are confident and have positive self-esteem because of supportive relationships among staff and pupils. p.5
- All staff who completed their inspection questionnaire said that they are proud to work in the school, which they believe is well led and managed. p.3
- Strong provision for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities ensures that funding is used effectively to meet a wide range of needs. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school is quick to identify any pupils who are at risk of falling behind. p.7
- Instances of poor behaviour are very rare. p.1
- Consequently, their knowledge of authors and books is weak. p.5
- There are very few incidents of poor behaviour. p.6
- A few pupils are identified with weaknesses in phonics. p.7
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,626
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Christ Church (Church of England) Junior School Woodcote Road, Tettenhall Wood, Wolverhampton, West Midlands WV6 8LG
p.1
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
p.1
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
p.1
Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good
p.1
Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Good
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
The headteacher, senior leaders and governors provide clear vision and direction. Pupils, parents and staff appreciate this strong leadership. Staff form a united and dedicated team. Leaders take decisive action. They have secured significant improvements in teaching and outcomes recently. As a result, the quality of teaching, learning and assessment is good. Most pupils make good progress in English and mathematics. However, teaching does not consistently ensure that tasks deepen understanding and provide challenge for the most able pupils. The governing body supports and challenges school leaders effectively. Governors share leaders’ high aspirations for pupils and are committed to securing further improvements. Effective safeguarding ensures that pupils are safe. All staff have a clear understanding of how to keep pupils safe. Disadvantaged pupils and those who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
disabilities make good progress in reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils’ conduct in classrooms and when playing on the playground is good. Instances of poor behaviour are very rare. Teachers’ recent focus on improving pupils’ writing has proved successful. Pupils are confident in editing and redrafting their work. Pupils apply their knowledge of grammar, spelling and punctuation well. However, handwriting and presentation are not consistently of a high standard across the curriculum. The curriculum is broad, and pupils enjoy a wide range of learning experiences. Pupils’ spiritual, social, moral and cultural development is a strength of the school. While pupils make good progress in reading, they do not have particularly positive attitudes to reading. Leaders know the school well and focus on the right areas for improvement. However, they do not make use of measurable success criteria, milestones and identify key personnel to
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
monitor and evaluate actions. English and mathematics are led well. However, leaders of other subjects do not yet have the skills to have sufficient impact on improving teaching in their subject. The school does not comply with the government guidance about what schools must publish on their websites.
p.1
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve the quality of teaching and the progress that pupils make by: – ensuring that tasks deepen understanding and provide more challenge for the most able pupils – ensuring that the quality of handwriting and presentation are of a high standard across the curriculum – developing pupils’ attitudes to reading by providing more varied and interesting books to read. Improve leadership and management by: – strengthening the impact of subject leaders in improving the quality of teaching in the science and the foundation subjects – sharpening school improvement planning to take account of measurable success criteria and milestones and identify key personnel to monitor and evaluate the impact of actions taken – ensuring that the school complies with government guidance on what maintained schools must publish about the proposed spend for the physical education and sport funding and the pupil premium grant.
p.2
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
The headteacher, senior leaders and governors provide clear vision and direction to ensure a high standard of education. They are committed to pupils achieving well academically, while developing the skills and attitudes that equip them to be successful learners. Staff are fully committed to the school’s aims. All staff who completed their inspection questionnaire said that they are proud to work in the school, which they believe is well led and managed. The headteacher has been well supported by the governors and the local authority. She has taken decisive action and worked successfully to address weaknesses in teaching and learning by taking well-considered and effective actions. She has managed staff changes well. Consequently, the quality of education remains good and high aspirations are set for pupils and staff. Teachers assess pupils’ attainment each half term. Leaders use this information
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
effectively to identify pupils, or groups of pupils, who are doing less well than they should. They then provide extra support to help these pupils to catch up. Leaders take appropriate steps to make sure that all groups of pupils have an equal chance to succeed. Strong provision for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities ensures that funding is used effectively to meet a wide range of needs. Additional funding for disadvantaged pupils is carefully targeted to support their needs and catch up in the way they should. For example, the funding has been used on additional teacher assistants to carry out intervention programmes, further resources and pastoral support. The curriculum is broad, and pupils enjoy a wide range of experiences. It is designed to ensure good coverage of the national curriculum and to promote positive key values. Fundamental British values are taught through the school’s six key values: honesty,
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
responsibility, caring, respect, trust, love of learning and one another. Pupils are motivated to learn because they enjoy events and trips, such as visits to the church, Wolverhampton Art Gallery, a local gurdwara and the National Space Centre. Pupils enjoy a range of extra-curricular activities, which include netball, football and a singing club. Pupils have an opportunity to learn to play a musical instrument, for example cello, violin, viola, double bass, recorder and guitar . Spiritual, moral, social and cultural education is developed well. The school engages with professionals such as the local clergy, police and fire service to enhance these aspects of the curriculum. The school has developed connections with a school in Kenya. The link between the two schools has allowed Christ Church to welcome staff members from Kenya for week-long visits. This provided pupils with an insight into the
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
lives of others and has given their education a global dimension. Parents who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, said that the school is well led and managed, that their child is well looked after and that they would recommend the school to another parent. One parent expressed the views of many when they wrote, ‘The ethos of the school makes it an excellent place for children to learn in a safe and caring environment!’ Leaders have an accurate view of the teaching because they check on it regularly. As a result, they focus on the right areas for improvement. Professional development and effective management of staff performance have had a positive impact on securing improvements, particularly in mathematics and pupils’ writing recently. However, leaders do not make enough use of measurable success criteria, milestones and key personnel to monitor and evaluate actions in school improvement planning.
p.3
Effectiveness of leadership and management Good
English and mathematics are led well. However, leaders of other subjects have not yet had the opportunity to make an impact on improving teaching in their subject.
p.4
Governance of the school
Governors know the school well. They are clear about strengths in the school’s work and about the priorities for future development. They share leaders’ high aspirations for pupils and are committed to securing further improvements. Governors hold school leaders to robust account for pupils’ learning and well-being. They make good use of a wide range of activities, such as discussions with leaders, visits to the school and policy reviews, to gauge the quality and effectiveness of the school’s work. As a result, they speak knowledgeably about the school’s performance. Governors carry out most of their statutory duties diligently. They check that additional funding, such as the pupil premium, is being spent effectively and is having sufficient impact. They ensure that leaders and teachers are set targets that are focused well on improving teaching and raising standards. Together with school leaders, governors
p.4
Governance of the school
have not ensured that the school complies with the government guidance about what schools must publish on their website.
p.4
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective. Senior leaders and governors have ensured that there is an ethos of keeping children safe in school. Staff are well trained and are aware of any dangers posed to pupils. Procedures are updated regularly. There are robust systems within the school to keep pupils safe. Processes for reporting concerns are clear and known by all staff. Referrals are timely and outside agencies are used appropriately. Procedures to recruit, select and check staff are robust, and the school’s single central record is compliant. Pupils feel safe, and parents agree that their children are safe. The school gives good attention to a range of risk assessments to keep both pupils and staff safe. Pupils are taught to stay safe in an age-appropriate way. They learn about online safety and they are taught about the dangers of radicalisation and extremism. Pupils who spoke with inspectors had a clear understanding of how to keep themselves safe
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
Leaders give teachers accurate feedback to improve their teaching. As a result, teaching is now consistently good. The impact of teaching on learning is reflected in the strong progress that pupils now make in reading, writing and mathematics in each year group. Teachers have good subject knowledge. They use this well when planning lessons as they take account of pupils’ abilities and needs. Consequently, lower-attaining pupils and pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are well supported and succeed. Teaching assistants provide good support in class for these pupils. However, teachers do not do enough to ensure that tasks deepen understanding and provide challenge for the most able pupils. Teaching is characterised by strong, respectful relationships. Teachers know their pupils very well. Pupils told inspectors that ‘The teachers are the best thing about the school.’ Well-established routines in classrooms mean that little time is wasted as
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
pupils move seamlessly from discussing in groups to listening to their teacher’s explanation. Pupils are attentive, hard-working and eager to learn. Teachers intervene at timely intervals to check on pupils’ learning. They address any misconceptions that individuals might have and give the necessary guidance about what must be improved, thereby enabling pupils to make faster progress. The work in the pupils’ books shows that they learn from their mistakes. A clear focus on improving pupils’ writing skills over recent years has proved successful. The work in pupils’ books and in displays around school reflects the strong progress that all groups of pupils make in writing. Pupils are confident in editing and redrafting their work. They apply their knowledge of grammar, spelling and punctuation well. However, handwriting and presentation are not consistently of a high standard. The teaching of mathematics is good. Teachers ensure that pupils are fluent in their
p.5
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good
mathematical skills and have regular opportunities to develop their problem-solving and reasoning skills. Support is provided for any pupils who have not shown an understanding. Teachers develop pupils’ reading skills well. An informed knowledge of pupils’ reading ability ensures that all pupils make good progress. Pupils who need extra support in phonics are taught well to enable them to decode unknown words. Pupils who read to inspectors did so with fluency and accuracy. However, the school does not provide enough varied and interesting books for the pupils to read. Consequently, their knowledge of authors and books is weak.
p.5
Personal development and welfare
The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good. Pupils enjoy coming to school. They are confident and have positive self-esteem because of supportive relationships among staff and pupils. Pupils know how to be a successful learner and have positive attitudes to learning. Pupils are polite, courteous and have good manners. They are respectful to each other and adults. They make visitors feel welcome. The care, guidance and physical and emotional well-being of all pupils is clearly a high priority at this school. Parents commented positively about the help and support their child receives and the good progress that they make. Pupils who are trained as playground buddies support others well in developing friendships. Pupils say that they feel safe around school and that they are confident that any incidents of bullying or the use of racist or homophobic language are rare. If they do
p.5
Personal development and welfare
occur, staff deal with them swiftly. The curriculum provides lots of opportunities for pupils to learn about being safe. The school organises special weeks with visiting speakers where the pupils learn about topics such as personal safety, online safety, health and safety, and anti-bullying. All parents who spoke to inspectors and responded to Parent View were very positive about the support their children receive. They are rightly confident that their children are happy and safe.
p.6
Behaviour
The behaviour of pupils is good. There is a calm atmosphere in school and pupils conduct themselves well around the building and in class. Staff, parents and pupils all agree that behaviour is good in school. Pupils know the school’s behaviour system well and have a strong sense of self- discipline. Pupils’ respect for others enables lessons to progress without hindrance or interruption. There are very few incidents of poor behaviour. School records show that incidents of poor behaviour in the classrooms are extremely rare. When they do occur, effective strategies are put in place to support pupils with challenging behaviour, so learning is not disrupted. Pupils’ attendance is above the national average. Leaders have a coherent and successful strategy to address non-attendance issues. The attendance of disadvantaged pupils and of those who have SEN and/or disabilities is showing marked improvements. Good attendance is recognised and suitably rewarded. Pupils are
p.6
Behaviour
punctual and are well prepared for lessons.
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
Over the past few years at the end of Year 6, pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics has been below average. This was especially the case for writing in 2016 and for boys, disadvantaged pupils and pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. The school has rigorously addressed these issues, and evidence from unvalidated 2017 statutory assessment data, work in pupils’ books and the school’s own tracking data show clearly that current pupils are now making consistently good progress in English and mathematics, as well as in other subjects across the curriculum. Pupils’ attainment in reading, writing and mathematics at the expected level was above national figures in the unvalidated 2017 data. By the end of Year 6, pupils have the necessary skills, knowledge and attitudes they need for secondary school. Just about all parents who responded to the recent questionnaire carried out by the school feel
p.6
Outcomes for pupils Good
that their children are making good progress. The school, supported by the local authority, conducts extensive and rigorously moderated assessments of pupils’ attainment in all years. English and mathematics assessments are moderated throughout the year internally and with other schools and a local adviser. A few pupils are identified with weaknesses in phonics. As a result of extra help and support, these pupils make good progress to catch up with their peers. Disadvantaged pupils make good progress in reading, writing and mathematics. This is because leaders carefully identify these pupils’ needs and put in place appropriate and effective support. The school is quick to identify any pupils who are at risk of falling behind. Staff make effective provision for these pupils through activities which are well matched to their individual needs and abilities. This includes pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities.
p.7
Outcomes for pupils Good
Where needed, detailed individual support plans are in place, with challenging targets. Consequently, the progress made by these pupils is largely good from their individual starting points. There are several pupils who speak English as an additional language and a few who are in the early stages of learning English. These pupils are taught well. They are given extra support to develop English vocabulary and language structures. Most-able pupils are not consistently challenged to make accelerated progress. Tasks are not always designed to deepen their understanding.
p.7
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Appropriate authority The governing body
p.8
School details
Website www.christchurchjuniorschool.org.uk
p.8
School details
Email address christchurchjuniorschool@wolverhampton.g ov.uk Date of previous inspection 16–17 July 2013
p.8
Information about this school
The school does not meet requirements on the publication of information about the proposed spend for the primary physical education and sport funding and the pupil premium grant. The school meets the government’s current floor standards. These set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of key stage 2. The school is an average-sized junior school. The proportion of pupils who are disadvantaged and who receive support from the pupil premium is well above average. The percentage of disabled pupils and those who have SEN and/or disabilities is just above that of most schools. The proportion of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds is above average. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is in line with the national average. The school receives support from the local authority, which has brokered the services
p.8
Information about this school
of a teaching school. There has been a large turnover of staff since the previous inspection.
p.9
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed learning in lessons, and some of these observations were conducted jointly with senior leaders. Inspectors paid attention to the work in pupils’ books to make judgements about pupils’ progress. They carried out a detailed scrutiny of books belonging to pupils in all year groups. Inspectors talked with many pupils about their learning and their attitudes to, and opinions about, school. They observed pupils at breaktime and lunchtime and as they moved around the school. Inspectors visited an assembly. A wide range of documents were scrutinised, including information relating to school improvement, governance, attendance, behaviour, safeguarding, pupils’ progress and the checks made on the quality of teaching. Meetings were held with the headteacher, senior leaders, middle leaders, teachers and eight governors, including the chair of the governing body. The lead inspector met with a representative of the local authority.
p.10
Information about this inspection
Inspectors took account of parents’ views by considering 41 responses to Parent View, including 14 ‘free-text’ comments. They also spoke with several parents at the start of the school day. Inspectors took account of 14 responses received on Ofsted’s staff inspection questionnaire. They also took account of 59 responses on Ofsted’s pupil inspection questionnaire.
p.10
Inspection team
Lynda Townsend, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector
p.10
Inspection team
Ian Beardmore Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.10
Inspection team
In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .
p.11
Inspection team
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.11
Inspection team
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .
p.11
Inspection team
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.
p.11
Inspection team
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.11
Inspection team
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .
p.11
Inspection team
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion