Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

Calverley Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

Inspected 5 Dec 2017 · published 28 Dec 2017 · URN 107996

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    5 Dec 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Anne Seneviratne

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    LS28 5NF

  • Name on report verified

    Calverley Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+89Very positivemore positive than 93% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisepositivestrongeffectivelyextremelyhighly skilledflourishenthusiasticfeel safe
Criticismconcernsbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1326w+89
  • What needs to improve114w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,432
about usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 53, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 83%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Robert Curran Headteacher Calverley Church of England Voluntary Aided Primary School Towngate Calverley Pudsey West Yorkshire LS28 5NF

p.1

School

Following my visit to the school on 5 December 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in July 2013.

p.1

School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. The tangible nurturing ethos that is at the heart of your school enables pupils to flourish. You have created a culture where everyone is welcomed and respected. Pupils and staff feel valued. They have a positive and enthusiastic attitude to everything that they do.

p.1

School

In the two years since taking up your post, you have provided strong leadership, steering the school successfully through a period of expansion and a new build. You have very effectively developed the leadership capacity in the school. In a collaborative way, you have empowered new leaders to make decisions and take actions to bring about improvements throughout the school. You have created a very strong senior leadership team that is founded on honest and open professional relationships.

p.1

School

The school benefits from having a strong team of governors. They have an accurate understanding of the school’s many strengths and areas that require further improvement. They appreciate the hard work of staff but are not afraid to challenge where necessary. In the words of one governor, ‘Nobody here rests on their laurels, but we want to raise the bar even further.’

p.1

School

Pupils are extremely positive about their school and relish their learning. They value the friendly and caring ethos of their school and the support and encouragement that they receive from their teachers. Pupils feel safe and happy, which helps them to learn more effectively. It is, therefore, a great shame that some disadvantaged pupils are missing out on this experience by not attending school regularly. You acknowledge that you need to do more to remedy this situation.

p.1

School

Parents are overwhelmingly positive about the school. Many of the parents who responded to the Ofsted online questionnaire spoke of how happy their children are and how much they love coming to school. They are full of praise for the school’s welcoming ethos and its ‘wonderful sense of community’.

p.2

School

At the last inspection, leaders were asked to raise the attainment of higher-ability pupils in key stage 1 by creating more opportunities to challenge them in their learning, particularly in mathematics. You have ensured that, as a result of high- quality teaching, all pupils, including the most able, make good progress during their time in key stage 1. Consequently, the proportions of pupils attaining the expected standard and greater depth in reading, writing and mathematics are above the national averages in all three subjects.

p.2

School

You ensure that a strong culture of safeguarding is at the heart of the school. All safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose, including protocols and practices for record-keeping. Systems to ensure that only suitable people are recruited to work with children in the school are secure.

p.2

School

It is evident that you and staff know your pupils extremely well. This, coupled with the training that staff receive, means that you are all well placed to spot any signs or symptoms of potential risk or abuse. All pupils who responded to the Ofsted online questionnaire say that they feel safe in school. They also know that they can talk to an adult in school if they are worried about anything.

p.2

School

Pupils learn about online safety as part of the computing and personal, social, health and economic education curriculum. A recent session for parents on this topic was very well attended and well received.

p.2

Inspection findings

 In the last two years, pupils have made average progress overall in reading. However, in 2017 middle-ability pupils’ progress in reading was significantly below the national average. You were not at all surprised that my main key line of enquiry for this inspection related to pupils’ progress in reading in key stage 2 as this is your top priority in your improvement plan. You describe this year as ‘the year of reading’ and staff, pupils and parents understand that this is the school’s number one priority. There is a buzz about reading in school. Pupils were keen to tell me how much they love reading. Pupils are very enthusiastic about the new reading programme that you have introduced in key stage 2. Several pupils were keen to talk to me about how much they enjoy reading and tell me about their favourite authors.  All teachers have a performance management target related to their pupils’ progress in reading. This means that they all understand the contribution that

p.2

Inspection findings

they make to pupils attaining high standards by the end of Year 6. Other actions that you have taken to bring about improvements in reading include: reorganising the way highly skilled teaching assistants work with pupils who may have fallen behind; providing more training for staff; appointing a senior leader to lead on reading across the school; holding reading workshops for parents; and refurbishing the school library. There is no doubting your commitment to improving pupils’ outcomes in reading and your actions are having a positive impact. Assessment information for Year 6 pupils indicates that a very high proportion are on track to achieve at least the expected standard at the end of the year. Tracking information for pupils in other year groups in key stage 2 shows that they are also making good progress.  We discussed the reasons why it appears that pupils made much better progress in writing in 2016 than they did in 2017. You acknowledge that the main reason

p.3

Inspection findings

relates to the accuracy of teachers’ assessments in 2016. You are now confident about the accuracy of teachers’ assessments as a result of much stronger moderation procedures. Teachers work closely with the local authority and other local schools. Teachers also have cross-phase writing moderation meetings within school. The actions you have taken to improve reading have also had a positive impact on the progress that pupils are making with their writing.  Another line of enquiry for this inspection was to find out what you are doing to ensure that the small number of disadvantaged pupils in your school make the best possible progress. You explained that because all teachers know their disadvantaged pupils well they are able to provide the appropriate support for them and meet their learning needs. While this may be happening at a classroom level, you accept that the strategic leadership of this area needs to be sharper.

p.3

Inspection findings

You acknowledge that you need to track the progress of these pupils more closely in order to evaluate effectively the impact of how you are spending the pupil premium funding.  Pupils really enjoy coming to school. Consequently, your overall attendance rate is high and has been consistently above the national average since the last inspection. However, this has not been the case for disadvantaged pupils. In the last two years, their attendance rate has moved closer to the national average. However, we discussed how a more focused approach, looking at the specific reasons why pupils are not attending school regularly, could lead to further improvements in this area.  The actions you have taken since taking up your post mean that all staff are now clearly focused on ensuring that all pupils make the best possible progress in English and mathematics. Pupils’ tracking information indicates that these actions

p.3

Inspection findings

are having a positive impact. However, evidence gathered from our joint book scrutiny, and from talking to pupils, raised some concerns about the wider curriculum. We agreed that pupils would benefit if they had more opportunities to develop their knowledge, skills and understanding in more depth across a broader range of subjects.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.4

Next steps for the school

 they monitor and evaluate more effectively the impact of how they are spending the pupil premium funding so that all of the small number of disadvantaged pupils attend school regularly and make the best possible progress  they provide more opportunities in the curriculum for pupils to develop their knowledge, skills and understanding in more depth across a wider range of subjects.

p.4

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Leeds, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Leeds. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, I met with you and other members of the senior leadership team. I also met with four members of the governing body, including the chair and vice-chair, and had a telephone conversation with a representative of the local authority. I met formally with two groups of pupils and talked informally with others in lessons and during morning break. I listened to pupils read. I also talked with parents informally at the start of the school day. Accompanied by you, I observed teaching and learning across the school. Together with you and other senior leaders, I scrutinised the work of a small group of pupils. I examined your self- evaluation document. I also undertook a review of the school’s website. As part of the inspection, I considered the responses to Ofsted’s Parent View questionnaire and responses from parents to Ofsted’s free-text survey. I also considered the responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaires for staff and pupils.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion