Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Woodford Green Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
29 Nov 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Jean Thwaites
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
IG8 0ST
- Name on report verified
Woodford Green Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- These continue to be strengths in the school as a result of the high expectations that all staff have of pupils and the good care they provide. p.1
- This is because leaders, well supported by staff who oversee attendance, have analysed absences carefully and taken an appropriately strong stance on unauthorised holidays during term time. p.3
- Currently, you are working with a local outstanding teaching school alliance, which is providing opportunities for staff to share expertise and take part in assessment moderation activities. p.1
- Pupils are rightly proud of their school and enjoy their learning. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,121
- shorter than usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr P J Prince Headteacher Woodford Green Primary School Sunset Avenue Woodford Green Essex IG8 0ST
p.1
Short inspection of Woodford Green Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 29 November 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in May 2014.
p.1
Short inspection of Woodford Green Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection.
p.1
Short inspection of Woodford Green Primary School
At the previous inspection, inspectors commented on pupils’ good behaviour and the happy atmosphere in which pupils learn. These continue to be strengths in the school as a result of the high expectations that all staff have of pupils and the good care they provide.
p.1
Short inspection of Woodford Green Primary School
You and your governors have a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and the areas requiring further development. Together, you work quickly, taking action to bring about improvements when they are needed. Governors challenge and support leaders at the school well. Governors scrutinise and understand the school’s performance information, and its effective performance management systems. This ensures that all staff know that only really good teaching will do.
p.1
Short inspection of Woodford Green Primary School
Since the last inspection, you and your governors have thought carefully about the future sustainability of a one-form-entry school. Different school-to-school partnerships have been trialled. Currently, you are working with a local outstanding teaching school alliance, which is providing opportunities for staff to share expertise and take part in assessment moderation activities. The benefits of this partnership can be seen in pupils’ work in their books and the raised expectations of what can be achieved. The areas identified during the last inspection are being addressed successfully. You and your governors prioritised the recruitment of an experienced, fully qualified early years leader. Developments in early years are ensuring that, since the last inspection, the proportions of children achieving a good level of development remain above national averages. Pupils take pride in their work, handwriting is
p.1
Short inspection of Woodford Green Primary School
developing well across the school, and teachers are more adept at checking on pupils’ understanding during lessons. However, there is still work to be done, particularly in improving writing outcomes for disadvantaged pupils in key stage 2, where the rates of progress, though improving, do not yet match those of other pupils nationally.
p.2
Short inspection of Woodford Green Primary School
All staff take their safeguarding responsibilities seriously. The most recent guidance on keeping children safe in education has been carefully considered by staff. They are fully trained and know precisely what to do if they have any concerns about a child’s well-being. Staff spoke informatively about their training and fortnightly discussions on a range of safeguarding risks, including female genital mutilation, extremism and radicalisation. A recent local authority audit of the school’s safeguarding procedures, and governors’ own in-school checks and visits, have further enhanced school systems.
p.2
Short inspection of Woodford Green Primary School
Leaders and staff responsible for overseeing the checks relating to staff recruitment and for keeping children safe from harm ensure that safer recruitment procedures are followed meticulously, and the relevant checks are carried out thoroughly. The leadership team ensures that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose.
p.2
Inspection findings
Governors are proactive and deeply committed to the school’s success. They execute their duties conscientiously, matching their personal skills and expertise to check on the different aspects of the school’s provision. Governors set high standards and are always seeking ways to improve their effectiveness as a governing body, commissioning recent reviews of both governance and the use of pupil premium funding. There have been a number of changes in teaching staff since the previous inspection. Leaders, including recently appointed phase leaders, provide staff with clear expectations and guidance on assessment and planning. This is ensuring pupils’ continued good progress from their starting points. Staff value the clear guidance. They have a passionate commitment to making sure that every pupil receives personal and academic support to help them to do well. Leaders throughout the school make careful checks on the quality of teaching
p.2
Inspection findings
and how well pupils are learning. Teachers, particularly those at the start of their career, receive well-judged support and guidance on how to develop. Leaders have been successful in maintaining the good behaviour and attitudes of pupils noted at the previous inspection. During the inspection, pupils were observed behaving sensibly and considerately in classrooms and around the school. A calm and purposeful atmosphere permeates the school. Pupils are rightly proud of their school and enjoy their learning. The culture of the school is summed up in your school motto: ‘work, grow, play and succeed’. It is based firmly on everyone working together, and getting to know each pupil as an individual so they are supported to do their best. Pupils display a good understanding of how teachers help them to learn, of what is right and wrong, and of how to keep themselves safe. Pupils were observed engaging in purposeful learning activities across the school.
p.2
Inspection findings
They talked enthusiastically about the books they have read and the class texts they have studied. Your commitment to reviewing the reading materials available, and establishing a library, has benefited pupils’ literacy skills considerably. Teachers have become skilled in their use of questioning and modelling writing based around interesting class texts. They use their knowledge well to identify more accurately how individuals are doing. They are trying a new approach to target individuals and key groups to provide more focused support. This approach, first trialled by phase leaders, and now used throughout key stages 1 and 2, is particularly benefiting disadvantaged pupils. It is supporting the good progress seen in their writing since the start of term. However, it is too soon to judge the impact of these new strategies. You and your staff recognise that there is still work to be done to ensure that any remaining differences between the
p.3
Inspection findings
outcomes for disadvantaged and other pupils nationally continue to diminish. Pupils’ attendance has improved this term and is now just above the national average. This is because leaders, well supported by staff who oversee attendance, have analysed absences carefully and taken an appropriately strong stance on unauthorised holidays during term time. This approach, along with close individual work with families and the local authority, has led to improved attendance rates for pupils.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.3
Next steps for the school
the progress that disadvantaged pupils make in writing continues to improve, so that they make at least as much progress as other pupils nationally, and achieve outcomes in line with age-related expectations.
p.3
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Waltham Forest. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Information about the inspection
During the inspection, I met with you, the vice-chair of the governing body and a group of staff from across the school. I had a telephone conversation with a representative from the local authority. I had a meeting with the officer for behaviour, attendance and children missing from education from the local authority who is working with the school, supporting ongoing improvements in pupils’ attendance. I also met with staff responsible for overseeing the checks relating to staff recruitment and for keeping children safe from harm. I met with a group of pupils, considered the 107 responses to Parent View, Ofsted’s online parent questionnaire, and the 33 free-text responses. I observed pupils as they learned in classrooms. Examples of children’s learning in their books were also looked at. A number of documents were reviewed, including records of your checks to safeguard children, and records of children’s progress and attainment. I scrutinised the
p.4
Information about the inspection
school’s plans for improvement, your evaluation of the school’s effectiveness, and documents relating to the work of the governing body. The responses to Ofsted’s online staff questionnaire were also considered.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion