Schools & FE · Short school inspection
Furzefield Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
28 Nov 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Luisa Gould
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
RH1 3PA
- Name on report verified
Furzefield Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- You have highly effective procedures in place to induct new members of staff and volunteers. p.2
- Pupils are happy at school, behave well and enjoy learning. p.1
- During this inspection, I evaluated: how well the teaching of phonics and reading impacts on pupils’ progress in key stage 1; what actions leaders are taking to ensure that pupils make the same rapid progress in mathematics as they do in reading and writing in key stage 2; and the achievement of disadvantaged pupils. p.3
- Staff are highly motivated and inspired to achieve your high expectations. p.1
- You and your staff work tirelessly to create a caring, homely and nurturing atmosphere. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Parents & families6
“Parents are highly supportive and positive about the school.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,382
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Susan Chrysanthou Headteacher Furzefield Primary School Delabole Road Merstham Redhill Surrey RH1 3PA
p.1
Short inspection of Furzefield Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 28 November 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in November 2012.
p.1
Short inspection of Furzefield Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. You and your senior leadership team have a sound understanding of the school’s strengths and next steps for development. Your school’s self-evaluation is accurate, and the development plan outlines clear strategies to bring about improvement. You have a clear vision for the pupils in your school, which all staff share and effectively put into practice. Staff are highly motivated and inspired to achieve your high expectations. Governors know the school well and mirror your aspirations for school improvement. They take their responsibilities seriously, providing school leaders with effective challenge, guidance and support.
p.1
Short inspection of Furzefield Primary School
You and your staff work tirelessly to create a caring, homely and nurturing atmosphere. All staff are dedicated to developing a ‘climate of trust and happiness’, which is a core part of the school’s vision. Pupils have positive attitudes to their learning and have a clear understanding of their responsibilities as learners and classmates.
p.1
Short inspection of Furzefield Primary School
Pupils are happy at school, behave well and enjoy learning. They describe learning as ‘fun and interesting’. Pupils speak with much enthusiasm about the curriculum and are able to draw upon key memories from their experiences and learning in school. For example, one pupil described how they went to the ‘cinema’ in the school hall, followed by a ‘sleepover’ in their classroom. Another described an exciting trip to the National History Museum, linked to their topic about dinosaurs. One pupil also gave an enthusiastic and detailed recount of their fun, engaging outdoor adventures.
p.1
Short inspection of Furzefield Primary School
Parents are highly supportive and positive about the school. All parents who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, said that their children are taught well at school, and all parents would recommend the school to others. The vast majority of parents feel that the school is led and managed efficiently and that their children are well looked after. Parents praise the school greatly for the extra- curricular opportunities offered to pupils at the school. Examples highlighted were a visit to Oxford University as part of the Croydon Children’s University, singing at the O2 as part of the school choir, and the wide range of sporting facilities available for pupils, including the running track on the school field.
p.2
Short inspection of Furzefield Primary School
At the time of the previous inspection, leaders were asked to provide more opportunities for pupils to work independently and to improve standards in writing. During the inspection, I observed pupils working independently in English and mathematics, carefully applying their skills to the tasks set for them. Your focus on the development of writing has brought about significant improvements. In 2017, pupils’ progress in writing at the end of Year 6 was in the top 20% of all schools nationally. Inspectors also asked you to improve communication between home and school, and ensure that parents felt that their views were heard and valued. Almost all parents who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire reported that the school responds appropriately to any concerns that they have. One parent commented that all staff, including senior staff, are accessible to talk to.
p.2
Short inspection of Furzefield Primary School
You are also keen to keep improving all aspects of the school. You are currently focusing on improvements to the teaching of phonics and reading in key stage 1, so that more pupils achieve the expected standards at the end of Year 2. In addition, you also acknowledge that in key stage 2, teachers do not provide sufficient challenge or opportunities for pupils to reason and solve problems in mathematics.
p.2
Short inspection of Furzefield Primary School
The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and records are detailed and thorough.
p.2
Short inspection of Furzefield Primary School
The safety of pupils is of paramount importance to all members of the school community. Policies and procedures are comprehensive and provide clear guidance for staff. You keep safeguarding under constant review and take swift and effective action, when needed, to further strengthen safeguarding procedures. You have recently made improvements to site security by carrying out enhanced risk assessments of all of the school’s extended services.
p.2
Short inspection of Furzefield Primary School
You ensure that all staff and governors receive high-quality training in order to keep them well informed. You have highly effective procedures in place to induct new members of staff and volunteers. The procedures for the vetting and recruitment of new staff are extremely thorough. The school’s records show that all checks on staff, governors and volunteers are completed diligently.
p.2
Short inspection of Furzefield Primary School
Pupils explain with confidence how the school teaches them to stay safe through lessons about fire safety, stranger danger and e-safety. They report that behaviour is usually good and that bullying is rare. When an occasional bullying incident occurs, all pupils feel that teachers take their concerns seriously and deal swiftly with the situation. Pupils are entirely confident that they can talk to any adult in the school if they ever have a worry or concern.
p.3
Inspection findings
During this inspection, I evaluated: how well the teaching of phonics and reading impacts on pupils’ progress in key stage 1; what actions leaders are taking to ensure that pupils make the same rapid progress in mathematics as they do in reading and writing in key stage 2; and the achievement of disadvantaged pupils. You have rightly identified the teaching of phonics and reading in key stage 1 as a priority for development. In 2017, a lower-than-average proportion of pupils achieved the required standard in the Year 1 phonics screening check. In addition, the proportion of pupils who achieved the expected standards in reading at the end of Year 2 was below the national average. From our joint observations of the teaching of phonics we could see improvements are taking shape. The good practice in phonics teaching in the early years is helping improvements to get underway in key stage 1. The school’s
p.3
Inspection findings
assessment information also indicates that pupils’ progress is improving. However, you and your leaders are rightly continuing to focus on securing improvements to the teaching of phonics and reading. In recent years in key stage 2, pupils’ progress in mathematics has been similar to that of other pupils nationally. Pupils have many opportunities to develop their fluency and calculation in mathematics. However, teachers do not routinely challenge pupils enough through tasks that require pupils to reason and to solve problems. Leaders recognise that there is sometimes insufficient challenge in the tasks pupils are set in mathematics to enable them to progress as well as they do in reading and writing. Pupils, on occasion, are not moved on quickly enough to the next steps in their learning. Leaders’ and governors’ effective use of the school’s pupil premium funding to support disadvantaged pupils is having a positive impact. In 2017, disadvantaged
p.3
Inspection findings
pupils in Year 6 made very good progress from their low starting points at the end of key stage 1. In reading and writing, these pupils made better progress than their classmates. However, fewer disadvantaged pupils achieved the expected standards in reading, writing and mathematics than other disadvantaged pupils nationally. The school’s assessment information shows that in some year groups and subjects the progress of disadvantaged pupils is more rapid than it is in others. You are, rightly, making sure that all leaders and staff continue their focus on accelerating the progress of these pupils, so that they are fully prepared for the next stage of their education.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.4
Next steps for the school
the quality of the teaching of phonics is consistently high, so that pupils’ progress in their phonics skills and reading accelerates and a greater proportion reach the expected standards in key stage 1
p.4
Next steps for the school
teachers provide greater challenge and opportunities for pupils to develop their reasoning skills and solve problems in mathematics in key stage 2.
p.4
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Surrey. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Information about the inspection
I met with you, your senior leaders and a group of governors. I had a telephone conversation with a representative from the local authority. We discussed and agreed the key lines of enquiry for the inspection. Jointly, we visited classes in the Nursery, Reception, key stage 1 and key stage 2. Alongside your subject leaders, I reviewed a range of English and mathematics books. We discussed the school assessment information about outcomes for current pupils, your plans for improvement, and your evaluation of the school’s effectiveness. I considered 47 responses to Ofsted’s online survey, Parent View, and took account of parents’ free- text comments. I analysed a range of school documentation, including policies and procedures, and minutes from governing body meetings. I met with your school business manager to review the pre-employment checks made on the suitability of staff to work with children. I checked other safeguarding documentation and
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion