Early years · Early years inspection (CIF)
Puddleduck Nursery School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Group verified
Rosedale Nursery Ltd
- Group reference verified
RP526266
- Inspection date verified
1 Dec 2017
- Inspectors verified
Hayley Marshall-Gowen
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Requires improvement
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Postcode verified
MK41 6EJ
- Name on report verified
Puddleduck Nursery School
- URN verified
EY346123
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Staff do not consistently make accurate assessments of children’s starting points. p.1
- On occasion, they cannot demonstrate that they are aware of what children’s starting points are. p.1
- This means they cannot reliably monitor the progress that children make. p.1
- Sometimes, staff make inaccurate assessments of children’s development. p.1
- The next steps they identify are not consistently accurate, or well matched to children’s individual stage of learning. p.1
- The provider does not effectively evaluate the nursery practice. p.1
- At times, progress for improvement is slow, and they do not swiftly identify and address areas of weakness. p.1
- Staff are kind, gentle and caring towards children. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language3
“Older children talk about foods they like when skilfully making sandwiches for snack time.” p.3Parents & families2
“Staff work closely with parents.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 721
- about usual (typical 773)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 13 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Puddleduck Nursery School Puddleduck Nursery School, Woodlands Park, Bedford Road, Clapham, Bedfordshire, MK41 6EJ
p.1
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 1 December 2017 19 August 2013
p.1
3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Requires improvement Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good 2
p.1
3
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision requires improvement. It is not yet good because:
Staff do not consistently make accurate assessments of children’s starting points. On occasion, they cannot demonstrate that they are aware of what children’s starting points are. This means they cannot reliably monitor the progress that children make. Sometimes, staff make inaccurate assessments of children’s development. The next steps they identify are not consistently accurate, or well matched to children’s individual stage of learning. The provider does not effectively evaluate the nursery practice. At times, progress for improvement is slow, and they do not swiftly identify and address areas of weakness.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Staff are kind, gentle and caring towards children. Children form close relationships with the staff who care for them. The effective key-person approach helps to ensure that staff meet children’s care needs well. Young children benefit from sensory play. They explore ice, sand and mud. Children enjoy feeling the different textures as they touch, feel and squeeze the materials in their hands. This helps them to learn about the world around them. Staff build effective relationships with other professionals. For example, children visit the neighbouring school to help them become familiar with staff and prepare them for moving on in their learning.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
improve ways of observing and assessing children's learning, to clearly identify their starting points and development over time 31/01/2018
p.2
Due Date
ensure that children's next steps in learning are relevant and suited to their individual age and stage of development, to support their progress. 31/01/2018
p.2
Due Date
To further improve the quality of the early years provision the provider should:
p.2
Due Date
improve evaluations of the nursery, to identify and swiftly tackle weaker areas of practice.
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspector observed the quality of teaching during activities indoors and outdoors, and assessed the impact this has on children's learning. The inspector completed a joint observation with the manager. The inspector held a meeting with the manager and provider. She looked at relevant documentation and evidence of the suitability of staff working in the nursery. The inspector spoke to children and a small number of parents during the inspection, and took account of their views.
p.2
Effectiveness of the leadership and management requires improvement
The provider, manager and staff all display an understanding of child protection issues. Staff complete relevant, regular training and are aware of the work of the Local Safeguarding Children Board. Arrangements for safeguarding children are effective. Staff work closely with parents. They share regular information, photographs and videos of children. Parents say they feel included in children's learning. The manager effectively supervises the work of staff. Although the manager completes some evaluations of the nursery, improvements are sometimes slow. For example, the outdoor area for babies does not mirror the good opportunities available for older children. Furthermore, the provider does not review new ways of working, which weakens staff practice.
p.3
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
Staff sing with children. They model language and recognise if children's speech is slower to develop. Staff spend time talking with children and helping them to hear and use language as they play. However, staff are overly concerned with seeing children repeat aspects of learning, before determining they are making progress. Consequently, they do not swiftly move children forward. The next steps they generate using a computer programme do not consistently match children's abilities. Staff know the children they care for and recognise that, at times, their assessments are inaccurate. This undermines their confidence, so they do not feel secure to use their own knowledge to address this. Despite these weaknesses, children enjoy their activities at the nursery.
p.3
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are good
Older children benefit from stimulating activities outdoors. They dress in waterproof suits and explore the garden in all weathers, helping to promote their good health. Children balance on tree stumps and tyres, testing out their physical skills and experiencing risk and challenge. They learn to care for local wildlife that live within the grounds of the nursery. For example, children enjoy feeding squirrels and pheasants, watching them intently through the window, fascinated by how they eat and move. Babies follow their own independent routines. They sleep when they are tired and eat nutritious meals.
p.3
Outcomes for children require improvement
The weakness in observations and assessments and the lack of accurate starting points mean that it is not possible to determine how well children progress at the nursery. Despite this, pre-school children develop skills in readiness for starting school. The most able children learn about letter sounds and numbers as they increase in ability. Children know how old they are, and how old they will be on their next birthday. Older children talk about foods they like when skilfully making sandwiches for snack time. Babies appear to be content and they settle well at the nursery.
p.3
Setting details
Unique reference number EY346123 Local authority Bedford Borough Inspection number 1064953 Type of provision Full-time provision Day care type Childcare - Non-Domestic Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 0 - 4 Total number of places 51 Number of children on roll 47 Name of registered person Rosedale Nursery Ltd
p.4
reference number
Date of previous inspection 19 August 2013 Telephone number 01234 330957
p.4
reference number
Puddleduck Nursery School registered in 2007. It is situated in Clapham and is managed by Rosedale Nursery Ltd. The nursery employs 10 members of childcare staff, nine of whom hold appropriate early years qualifications at level 3 or above. The nursery opens Monday to Friday, all year round. Sessions are from 8am until 6pm. The nursery provides funded early education for two-, three- and four-year-old children.
p.4
reference number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.4
reference number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.4
reference number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.5
reference number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.5
reference number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion