Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Stockland Green School

Inspected 22 Nov 2017 · published 20 Dec 2017 · URN 138137

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Nov 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Bianka Zemke, Dan Owen, Elaine Haskins, Mark Bailie

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    B23 7JH

  • Name on report verified

    Stockland Green School

  • URN verified

    138137

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2015.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • OutcomesGood
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+61Positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongimprovedhigh expectationseffectiveeffectivelystrengthspositiverobust
Criticismfall behindweaknessesnot consistentlyexclusionsweaknessat riskweakrequires improvement

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1823w+57
  • Leadership896w+69
  • Safeguarding129w+29
  • What needs to improve84w+14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
2,863
about usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%Leadership 24%Safeguarding 4%What needs to improve 2%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

Stockland Green School Slade Road, Erdington, Birmingham, West Midlands B23 7JH

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Good

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The headteacher and her dedicated leadership team know their school very well. They have an accurate view of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. Their self-evaluation is robust and accurate.  Outcomes for pupils are good because teaching is strong. Leaders track pupils’ performance rigorously, so that they can put effective support in place when pupils fall behind and need to catch up.  Disadvantaged pupils’ outcomes are improving from low starting points. Although diminishing, there is still a difference in the performance of disadvantaged pupils in a small number of subjects. Leaders have put plans in place to tackle this underperformance.  Senior leaders evaluate rigorously the quality of teaching. They support teachers to continuously improve their practice. Staff training effectively supports leaders’ drive for excellence.  The school plays an active part in the Arthur Terry Learning Partnership. Regular

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

subject leader meetings and the sharing of best practice within the partnership have been pivotal in the school’s continued improvement.  Behaviour in lessons and at social times is good. Pupils are courteous, friendly and mature in discussions about sensitive issues.  Pupils feel safe at school and are complimentary about the pastoral support they receive when they need it. They are confident that they know who to talk to if they have a concern.  Governors hold leaders to account effectively. They are a dedicated group of professionals who know the strengths of the school and what actions need to be taken to improve further.  Parents, staff and pupils are supportive of school leaders and feel that the school has improved markedly since the last inspection. As a result, the school is oversubscribed.  In a small minority of lessons, teachers do not take account of what pupils already know or can do. In these cases, pupils can

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

become disengaged in their learning or display off-task behaviour.  Fixed-term exclusions are above national averages. Leaders are aware of this and have robust action plans in place to reduce exclusions.

p.1

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve teaching by making sure that teachers consistently: – use the range of information available about what pupils already know and can do to plan lessons that challenge and support them – plan activities that focus on pupils’ learning to ensure that they remain focused throughout the lesson.  Improve pupils’ outcomes, particularly for disadvantaged pupils, by ensuring that a greater number of them make accelerated progress.  Reduce the number of fixed-term exclusions by supporting pupils to meet higher standards of behaviour.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

 The senior leadership team has a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. It has well-focused plans in place and considerable improvement is evident in many areas of previous weakness. For example, outcomes in mathematics have improved markedly in 2017 and are now broadly in line with those of other pupils nationally.  The leadership of teaching, learning and assessment is a clear strength. The headteacher and her team of senior leaders accurately evaluate and analyse the school’s performance. They act quickly to address any underperformance they identify. Leaders take a range of evidence into consideration when they are evaluating the impact of teaching on pupils’ progress.  Leaders look at teachers’ planning, observe lessons, drop into lessons and look at pupils’ assessment information and their work. As a result, leaders have detailed and accurate knowledge of which groups of pupils fall behind, and they take effective

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

action to help them catch up.  Senior leaders are aspirational and have high expectations of staff and pupils. They have successfully created an ethos of ‘aspire, believe and achieve’ within the school, which is widely shared and adopted. One senior leader commented that ‘mediocrity is not an option at our school’.  Middle leaders are a group of dedicated and determined professionals. They have an accurate view of their subject areas, and continue to improve the quality of teaching and learning across the school. Middle leaders share best practice within the school and the wider partnership in regular meetings. This has resulted in stronger outcomes for pupils. For example, in 2017 in science, outcomes improved significantly and continue to improve further for current pupils.  Leaders make sure that reports to parents are detailed and useful. The reports pinpoint what pupils need to do to improve, and state clearly which subjects they are

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

succeeding in. The vast majority of parents who responded to Parent View, Ofsted’s online questionnaire, said that the information they receive about their child’s progress is valuable.  Staff state that the training they receive has a positive impact on pupils’ learning. In particular, trainee teachers say that they appreciate the support given to them, both professionally and in terms of being made to feel part of the school team.  Newly qualified teachers regard highly the support that leaders give them. They feel fully supported as they develop their skills in teaching and managing pupils’ behaviour. They value the quality of the training that they receive and the way in which leaders encourage them to be reflective practitioners. Through this support, newly qualified teachers are already able to speak with passion and knowledge about a range of educational topics. They understand their role, for example, in developing pupils’

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

confidence and improving pupils’ longer-term career prospects.  The school’s work to provide pupils with careers information, advice and guidance is strong. This has a highly positive impact on pupils’ destinations. All pupils in Year 10 and Year 11 have careers interviews with an impartial adviser. Leaders provide a range of exciting opportunities for pupils to meet with employers and universities. Pupils go on to a variety of destinations that match their aspirations and abilities. This includes, in 2017, around one in 10 of the cohort who went on to apprenticeships in a variety of career areas. In 2017, when Year 11 pupils left, almost all went into employment, education or training. Leaders carefully target disadvantaged pupils who are at risk of not meeting their potential. These pupils benefit from, for example, specialist mentoring and university-based subject knowledge support.  Senior leaders use and evaluate effectively the impact of the additional funding they

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Good

receive. For example, one-to-one support and targeted, timely interventions are planned carefully and reviewed for their impact on outcomes. As a result, many pupils catch up.  The school’s curriculum offers a balanced breadth of learning experiences which are tailored to pupils’ individual needs. Extra-curricular activities underpin the curriculum effectively and include, for example, many sporting clubs, debate club and the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award.  Leaders have created an inclusive ethos in the school, in which every pupil is valued. Pupils feel safe and parents and staff agree that children are safe and well cared for at the school. The overwhelming majority of parents who responded to Parent View would recommend the school to other parents. The school is now oversubscribed.

p.4

Governance of the school

 Governance at the school is strong. Governors know the school well and have a clear view of the strengths and areas the school needs to further improve. They are dedicated to the school and possess many strengths. They bring a range of relevant experiences and expertise to their roles.  Members of the governing body have high expectations of the school’s performance and strive for a school in which pupils receive an excellent education, grow as human beings and become the best citizens they can possibly be.  Governors provide an effective balance of support and challenge to the school leadership team. They use information gathered through visits to school, as well as from reports provided by leaders, to ask challenging questions in order to bring about further improvements.  Governors discharge their statutory duties with diligence. They monitor the school’s budget carefully. They check that safeguarding arrangements are robust and ensure

p.4

Governance of the school

that systems to manage teachers’ performance focus on improving the quality of teaching and pupils’ outcomes.

p.4

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  Staff work together to create a culture of safeguarding which is underpinned by regular training for every member of staff at the school. All staff agree that leaders make pupils’ welfare and safety a priority.  The safeguarding team works constructively with relevant external agencies. Staff are persistent when they are concerned about a pupil’s welfare and follow up concerns with these agencies as necessary.  All pupils who spoke with inspectors said that they feel safe in school. Pupils have a secure understanding of how to keep themselves and others safe. They understand the risks surrounding online safety and social media, for example. Pupils can identify online risks and the preventative steps that they should take to keep themselves safe.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 Teachers have high expectations of pupils and foster strong and respectful relationships. Teachers have good subject knowledge and plan lessons that use a range of innovative strategies to stimulate pupils’ interest and curiosity.  Teachers use the ‘do it now’ and ‘review it now’ tasks at the start and end of lessons to ensure that no learning time is wasted. It allows pupils opportunities to review their learning independently. These tasks have a positive impact on pupils’ learning and they use them when completing homework tasks. Teachers set regular homework which aids pupils’ further understanding of topics covered in lessons.  Teachers give ongoing verbal feedback to pupils. They check pupils’ understanding effectively and provide support and intervention when pupils fall behind and need to catch up. Pupils speak highly of the support they receive in lessons and feel well supported to do their best and take risks.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 Pupils use detailed feedback to understand their mistakes and address misconceptions quickly before they become errors. Pupils are encouraged, across the curriculum, to correct their spelling, punctuation and grammar. This focus is improving pupils’ literacy awareness and skills. For example, inspectors saw spelling tests in technology and art lessons which were helping pupils to use subject-specific terms accurately.  Leaders monitor the quality of teaching rigorously across the curriculum. As a result, teaching in science and mathematics has improved and is now strong. Consequently, pupils’ outcomes have improved and are now broadly in line with those of pupils nationally with similar starting points.  Pupils have the capability and maturity to tackle higher and deeper thinking during challenging topics within a range of subjects. This aids their personal development and strengthens their understanding of current and topical issues.

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

 Pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities say that they appreciate the extra help they get in lessons as this enables them to make progress. They also appreciate the specialist one-to-one support they receive from staff. The progress of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is good.  Leaders regularly assess pupils’ progress and use this information to identify priorities for staff training. Teachers work closely with colleagues across the partnership and they frequently moderate work. This helps everyone to reach a common understanding about the expected standards within the new and more challenging GCSE examinations.  Teachers do not consistently use a range of information about their pupils when planning lessons. As a result, learning is not consistently designed to take into account what pupils already know or can do. Where this is the case, pupils are disengaged in

p.5

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

their learning and can participate in off-task behaviour.

p.6

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare is good.  The pastoral support provided by the school is a strength. Pupils, parents and staff are unanimous in their praise for the help, support and guidance pupils receive when appropriate.  The school is proud of its inclusive ethos, where every pupil is valued and cared for. Pupils say that bullying is rare. They have every confidence that, when it does occur, it is dealt with swiftly and effectively by staff.  Pupils wear their uniform with pride and look smart. They are proud of their school and look after the school environment. As a result, the school’s buildings are free from litter and graffiti.  Pupils have numerous opportunities to explore leadership positions through the school’s pupil leadership scheme. The school council, for example, had an input in designing the new uniform and older pupils adopt a mentoring role for their younger

p.6

Personal development and welfare

peers to offer support when they need it. These roles contribute to pupils’ readiness for the world of work.  Leaders monitor carefully the well-being of pupils who attend alternative provision. They track pupils’ attendance and progress. Leaders chose the courses for these pupils based on their interests and individual needs. This ensures that these pupils access learning which prepares them well for their working life. Leaders keep in regular contact with, and visit the settings of, these providers to ensure that pupils are safe and well cared for.  Leaders plan the curriculum to ensure that pupils have a good understanding of current and topical issues, such as sexting and social media dangers. While pupils have a basic understanding of the risks surrounding radicalisation and extremism, leaders acknowledge that their plans to raise awareness of these issues are not as effective as they could be. Plans are in place to strengthen pupils’ understanding in this area

p.6

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils is good.  Pupils behave well in lessons and learning time is rarely wasted. Behaviour during social times and in corridors at lesson change-over is calm and orderly. The vast majority of pupils who spoke with inspectors confirm that the behaviour around school and in lessons is good. Parents who responded to Parent View and staff who completed the staff survey agreed that behaviour has improved drastically. Pupils are friendly, courteous and polite.  Leaders have high expectations of pupils’ behaviour. Staff supervision is high while, at the same time, allowing pupils the opportunity to correct their own behaviour. Pupils observed during lunchtime, for example, behaved in a respectful and orderly manner at all times. Inspectors saw no instances of poor behaviour.  School leaders engage well with parents. As a result of targeted support, attendance has improved, particularly for disadvantaged pupils. Attendance across the school and

p.6

Behaviour

for groups of pupils is in line with the national average.  The behaviour of pupils who attend alternative provision settings is monitored closely. Leaders communicate effectively and regularly with the providers to ensure that high standards of discipline are maintained. Leaders closely liaise with parents of pupils at these settings and inform them how well their child is doing.  Fixed-term exclusions are above the national average. Inspectors saw clear evidence that this sanction is having a positive impact on managing pupils’ behaviour, although learning time is lost as a result. When pupils return from exclusions, their behaviour improves. A small number of pupils have been supported into more appropriate alternative curriculum settings when required, where they receive individualised pastoral support. The number of pupils who have been permanently excluded from school has reduced sharply.

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Good

 Since the last inspection, outcomes in many subject areas have improved. For example, pupils’ performance in mathematics and science is now broadly in line with that of other pupils nationally with similar starting points.  In 2017, outcomes in most subjects were in line with or rapidly moving towards national averages. Leaders’ analysis of recent assessment information suggests that the progress of pupils currently in the school is good across a range of subjects, including English and mathematics.  Leaders have devised an effective system of providing each pupil with aspirational targets which are based on their individual starting points. These targets are regularly reviewed and adjusted to take account of pupils’ individual needs. Pupils are able to explain these targets and can articulate the steps they need to take to reach their next milestones.  Outcomes for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are good. Pupils achieve broadly

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Good

in line with their peers and are supported well to reach the next steps in their education. The school’s autistic spectrum disorder base provides effective support and consistently secures strong outcomes.  Many pupils have weak basic literacy skills when they join the school. Leaders have recently introduced a school-wide programme to improve literacy levels. This programme is funded through the Year 7 catch-up funding. As a result of this targeted intervention, the majority of pupils catch up and reach the standards expected for their age.  The achievement of pupils at alternative provision is carefully monitored and analysed. The pupils’ curriculum has appropriately been adapted to prepare them well for their next steps in education.  A higher-than-average proportion of pupils speak English as an additional language. These pupils have well-developed English literacy skills and secure strong outcomes.

p.7

Outcomes for pupils Good

They achieve as well as other pupils in the school.  Pupils follow an appropriate curriculum at key stage 4, which is designed to prepare them well for their next steps in education or training. The vast majority of pupils take courses leading to the English Baccalaureate. Leaders use the information they have about pupils to plan individually designed GCSE pathways. Consequently, the number of pupils who leave the school and go onto further education, employment or apprenticeships is high and rising.  While disadvantaged pupils’ outcomes are improving, inconsistencies remain. In a small number of subjects, differences from national averages still exist. Leaders have put effective plans in place to tackle this underperformance and these differences are beginning to diminish for current disadvantaged pupils.

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Email address enquiry@stockgrn.bham.sch.uk

p.9

School details

Date of previous inspection 19–20 March 2015

p.9

Information about this school

 The school meets requirements on the publication of specified information on its website.  The school complies with Department for Education guidance on what academies should publish.  The school is smaller than the average secondary school. It is oversubscribed.  The school is a founding member of the Arthur Terry Learning Partnership.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations set for pupils’ attainment and progress.  The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is above average.  The proportion of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities is above average. The school has an on-site autistic spectrum disorder base, where 11 pupils are currently educated.  The proportion of students who are from minority ethnic backgrounds is above average, the largest group being of Pakistani heritage. The proportion of pupils who speak English as an additional language is above average.

p.9

Information about this school

 Full-time off-site alternative provision is currently provided for five pupils in Year 11 at Lighthouse Group, Oscott Academy, James Brindley School and Premier Training.

p.10

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors reviewed a wide range of documentation. This included the school’s self- evaluation and action plans, minutes of meetings of the governing body, school policies, information about pupils’ attainment, progress, behaviour and attendance and information about the quality of teaching, learning and assessment.  Inspectors observed teaching and learning in 49 lessons and parts of lessons across a wide range of subjects, and observed some lessons with a senior leader. They observed pupils’ behaviour between lessons and at breaktime and lunchtime.  Inspectors evaluated the work in pupils’ books and folders in lessons across a range of year groups. They listened to pupils of different abilities read.  Inspectors held meetings with governors, senior and middle leaders and teachers, including those who are newly qualified and those training to become a teacher. Inspectors also met with two senior representatives from the Arthur Terry Learning

p.11

Information about this inspection

Partnership.  The views of parents were considered through the 102 responses to Parent View, as well as the 26 free-text comments parents provided.  Inspectors considered 37 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire for staff.  Inspectors met with pupils in four separate focus groups. Inspectors had numerous informal discussions with pupils.

p.11

Inspection team

Bianka Zemke, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.11

Inspection team

Elaine Haskins Ofsted Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.11

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.12

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.12

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.12

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.12

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.12

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.12

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion