Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Independent school inspection

Garden City Montessori School

Inspected 17 Nov 2017 · URN 142413

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Cindy Impey

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Nov 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Cindy Impey

  • Postcode verified

    SG6 4UE

  • Name on report verified

    Garden City Montessori School

  • URN verified

    142413

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 75% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseindependentconfidentlyimprovedconsistentlygood progressmake good progressrobusteffective
Criticismnot metnot robuststrugglenot rigorous

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1157w+60
  • What needs to improve61w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,191
shorter than usual (typical 1813)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 49
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 64%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 33%

Full report text

School progress monitoring inspection report

p.1

Garden City Montessori School 269 Icknield Way, Letchworth Garden City, Hertfordshire SG6 4UE

p.1

Main inspection findings

Part 1. Quality of education provided Paragraph 3, 3(a), 3(d)  The previous inspection highlighted that leaders’ monitoring of teaching, learning and assessment was not robust enough to ensure that the school was sufficiently meeting the needs of all pupils. In addition, systems and processes for tracking progress were not rigorous enough to ensure that all pupils were making the progress of which they were capable.  In the school’s action plan, the proprietor proposed to train current staff in the Montessori education system and establish and implement a robust system for staff evaluation. Plans to strengthen the tracking of all pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics were detailed within the school’s priorities.  A change in staffing structure along with relevant training to develop teachers’ practice have strengthened the quality of teaching, learning and assessment across the school.

p.1

Main inspection findings

There is now sufficient challenge to support pupils to make good and better progress.  Leaders have now introduced effective systems for tracking the progress of all pupils over time. Teachers can confidently talk about individual pupils, the good progress they are making and the next steps needed to help them to progress further.  All teachers know individual pupils well and can explain where specific individuals both struggle and excel. Teachers use what they know about pupils and their observations and tracking information to form an accurate view of each pupil’s needs. Teachers then adapt teaching and learning appropriately.  Children and pupils in all three classes were keen to share their learning. For example, one child demonstrated a systematic approach to show her understanding of place value. She was able to explain how the resources she was using were helping her to make tens, twenty and thirty.

p.1

Main inspection findings

 In the Nursery and primary class, teachers’ assessment of children’s and pupils’ progress is recorded electronically against the early years curriculum and the Montessori objectives. The system immediately identifies where children and pupils are in their learning and highlights those who are not making sufficient progress. These children and pupils are then given additional support that helps them catch up.  The recently appointed elementary teacher applies a systematic approach to her teaching, learning and assessment processes. She tracks pupils’ progress against the national curriculum for each pupil. She uses her own knowledge of the individual pupils to set activities, which she knows will stretch them.  Planning takes into consideration pupils’ interests. For example, pupils had chosen cars as their project and model cars were being used as a resource to help them visualise mathematical concepts during a number task. In almost all activities, pupils are asked to

p.1

Main inspection findings

explain and extend their thinking. Pupils choose appropriate resources to support their own learning. They are asked to reflect on what they think went well over the course of the week and how they think they could improve. As a result, pupils are very aware of what they are learning and what they needed to do to improve.  Pupils are making good and better progress from their different starting points. Where pupils are not achieving age-related expectations, they soon catch up because of the precise support provided by carefully planned activities.  Leaders have ensured that this independent school standard is now met.

p.2

Main inspection findings

Part 8. Quality of leadership in and management of schools Paragraph 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b)  This standard was not met at the inspection in February 2017 because the proprietor had not ensured that all of the independent school standards had been met and had breached the conditions of the school’s registration.  In the school’s action plan, the proprietor proposed to ensure that the independent school standards are met by ensuring that leaders establish clear lines of accountability, and by developing governors’ knowledge and skills further through training and by sharing good practice.  Governors are now strategic in their approach and have established clear lines of accountability. The school’s action plan is closely aligned to the areas for improvement identified in the previous inspection report. Governors have developed a separate committee responsible for managing the financial aspects of the school. Since the

p.2

Main inspection findings

previous inspection, governors have recruited a governor with additional knowledge and experience in education to ensure compliance with the independent school standards. Therefore, they have now ensured that the governing body has a range of appropriate skills to support and challenge school leaders.  Further governor training is planned for the autumn term. Governors have ensured that they work more closely with school leaders on a regular basis, on all aspects of school improvement. As a result, they know how the quality of teaching and assessment affects how well pupils achieve. Governors now confidently hold leaders to account for the quality of teaching, learning and assessment across all three classes.  Governors have much improved knowledge and understanding of what needs to be in place to ensure that the outcomes for all pupils are good and better. Governors’ minutes show that they now receive a detailed report from the head of school and school

p.2

Main inspection findings

priorities are discussed at each meeting. They work closely with school leaders on areas of school improvement as detailed in the school’s action plan.  Governors make regular visits to monitor leaders’ progress against the school priorities and therefore have an accurate view of the school. They can talk confidently about the improved quality of teaching, learning and assessment. They have evaluated the new systems for tracking and assessing the progress pupils make in all classes and have accurately identified the next stages for improving systems further.  Governors are committed to the continuing professional development of all staff. Leaders have reviewed the staff performance system and staff performance is measured against appropriate targets. Leadership has been strengthened through the distribution of responsibility, ensuring that the head of school has enough time dedicated to the running of the school. New leaders have embraced these responsibilities, as

p.2

Main inspection findings

demonstrated in positive outcomes for pupils.  Leaders have ensured that this independent school standard is now met.

p.3

Compliance with regulatory requirements

The school meets the requirements of the schedule to the Education (Independent School Standards) Regulations 2014 (‘the independent school standards’) and associated requirements that were checked during this inspection. This included the standards and requirements that the school was judged to not comply with at the previous inspection. Not all of the standards and associated requirements were checked during this inspection.

p.4

The school now meets the following independent school standards

 The proprietor must ensure that the teaching at the school: – enables pupils to acquire new knowledge and make good progress according to their ability so that they increase their understanding and develop their skills in the subjects taught – shows a good understanding of the aptitudes, needs and prior attainments of the pupils, and ensures that these are taken into account in the planning of lessons (paragraphs 3, 3(a), 3(d)).  The standard about the quality of leadership and management is met if the proprietor ensures that persons with leadership and management responsibilities at the school: – demonstrate good skills and knowledge appropriate to their role so that the independent school standards are met consistently – fulfil their responsibilities effectively so that the independent school standards are met consistently (paragraphs 34(1), 34(1)(a), 34(1)(b)).

p.4

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 109(1) and (2) of the Education and Skills Act 2008, the purpose of which is to advise the Secretary of State for Education about the school’s suitability for continued registration as an independent school.

p.5

School details

Proprietor Letchworth Garden City Church

p.5

School details

Annual fees (day pupils) £5,235 to £9,225

p.5

School details

Date of previous standard inspection 21–23 February 2017

p.5

Information about this school

 Garden City Montessori is an independent day school. It opened in January 2015 with four pupils. Over the past two years, the school has grown in size. There are currently 36 pupils on roll.  A very small number of pupils speak English as an additional language.  The proprietor is the Elim Four Square Gospel Alliance. The governing body is made up of staff from the school and representatives from the church.

p.5

Information about this inspection

 This inspection was carried out at the request of the registration authority for independent schools without notice. The purpose of the inspection was to monitor the progress the school has made in meeting the independent school standards and other requirements that it was judged to not comply with at its previous inspection.  The inspector examined a wide range of documents. These documents included the school’s school improvement plans, school policies, information about the curriculum, safeguarding documents, minutes of governing body meetings and information about the progress of pupils.  The inspector visited all classes to observe learning throughout the school.  The inspector looked at a pupils’ work, including pupils’ journals, individual achievement folders and photographic evidence.  The inspector spoke with pupils throughout the inspection about their learning.  The inspector looked at the school’s single central record of employment checks.

p.6

Information about this inspection

 The inspector met with teachers, support staff, the vice-chair of the governing body and the business operations manager.

p.6

Inspection team

Cindy Impey, lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.6

Inspection team

Parent View You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.7

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visitwww.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.7

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.7

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.7

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.7

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion