Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St Anne's Roman Catholic High School, Stockport

Inspected 22 Nov 2017 · URN 106144

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Sally Kenyon (lead), Jonathan Jones, Osama Abdul Rahim

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Nov 2017

  • Inspectors verified

    Jonathan Jones, Osama Abdul Rahim, Sally Kenyon

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Outcomes verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Inadequate

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    SK4 2QP

  • Name on report verified

    St Anne’s Roman Catholic High School, Stockport

  • URN verified

    106144

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2006.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement
  • OutcomesRequires improvement
  • Personal development, behaviour and welfareRequires improvement
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+1Mixedmore positive than 27% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressconsistentlygood progressimprovedhigh expectationsstrongeffectiveimproving
Criticismrequires improvementnot yetinadequatemissedlackbelownot consistentlyweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveLeadershipSafeguardingAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings652w−29
  • Leadership126w+33
  • Safeguarding83w+17
  • What needs to improve883w+37

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,693
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 47
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 28%Leadership 5%Safeguarding 4%What needs to improve 38%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

St Anne’s Roman Catholic High School, Stockport Glenfield Road, Heaton Chapel, Stockport, Cheshire SK4 2QP

p.1

Overall effectiveness Requires improvement

p.1

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

p.1

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

p.1

Personal development, behaviour and welfare Requires improvement

p.1

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

p.1

Overall effectiveness at previous inspection Inadequate

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that requires improvement

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The quality of teaching has improved, leading to much-improved outcomes. Typically, pupils are challenged by their learning, but this is not yet consistent.  There is too much reliance on assessing pupils at a point in time solely by a test that they have revised for. There are missed opportunities to check how securely pupils can apply their knowledge and skills in different ways.  Pupils make good progress across a range of subjects and in key stage 3. Progress in mathematics is improving but not quickly enough in key stage 4. The progress of disadvantaged pupils is improving but is not yet good.  Support for pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities is not consistently effective, leading to variations in progress.  Pupils look very smart in their uniforms. The vast majority of pupils behave with courtesy and respect to each other and to adults. However, a small minority of pupils behave in a

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

boisterous way at social times and talk across the teacher in lessons.  Attendance is below the national average. Although attendance of disadvantaged pupils is improving, it too remains below average.  The curriculum has improved since the previous inspection. There is greater challenge for middle- and high-ability pupils. The curriculum, particularly in mathematics, is more engaging and interesting. However, too few pupils study modern foreign languages in key stage 4, and there is a lack of extra-curricular activities, particularly at lunchtimes.  Key weaknesses in senior leadership have been addressed, and governance has been strengthened. There is clear capacity for further improvement.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 The recently appointed headteacher has a precise understanding of what needs to be done to make this a good school. She has the support of the vast majority of staff who understand the need for change.  Pupils make consistently good progress in English due to strong leadership, high expectations and engaging teaching.  Middle leadership has many strengths, notably in the core subjects.

p.1

Full report

In accordance with section 13(4) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires special measures.

p.2

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve progress in mathematics, particularly in key stage 4 by: – giving greater focus to the teaching of problem solving, reasoning and fluency.  Continue to improve the quality of teaching by: – expanding the breadth of assessment so that teaching consistently meets pupils’ needs – ensuring that pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are consistently well supported in lessons.  Continue to improve behaviour and attendance by: – ensuring that pupils demonstrate consistently strong attitudes to learning – using pupil premium funding more incisively to improve attendance.  Strengthen leadership and management by: – continuing to adapt the curriculum so that more pupils study modern foreign languages and ensuring that there is a much greater provision of extra-curricular activities at lunchtimes – ensuring that school policies reflect practice.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Leaders, managers and governors are ambitious for the school. Their capacity for further improvement is demonstrated by the improvement in teaching, outcomes, behaviour and leadership since the previous inspection.  Self-evaluation is accurate and there is a clear and effective plan for improvement.  The leadership and management of teaching have been strengthened by employing external expertise to create a culture of coaching and continuous improvement.  There has been much continual professional development, which has resulted in tangible improvements to teaching and outcomes.  Pupils carry out charitable work and fundraise to help those who are less fortunate. They receive a curriculum addressing fundamental British Values and social, moral, spiritual and cultural education. However, there are missed opportunities to enhance and develop this aspect of school life to better equip pupils for life in modern Britain.

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

 Funding for disadvantaged pupils, Year 7 catch-up funding and funding for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities have had an impact. Pupils are catching up quickly in English and mathematics in Year 7. However, other funding has been spread too broadly and not monitored closely enough, so the impact is diluted.  Over the past three years, there has been a plethora of school-to-school support and several interim headteachers. Overall, this has resulted in a positive discernible impact. However, some support, in the early stages of special measures, was not monitored closely enough, so governors, the local authority and the diocese were given the impression that more improvements had been made than was the case.  Historically, the curriculum has restricted pupils’ abilities to make good progress across a range of subjects. This has resulted in higher than average proportions of pupils who are not in education, employment or training. Now there are more appropriate

p.3

Effectiveness of leadership and management Requires improvement

pathways, for example in science, which allow the most able pupils to make good progress. However, only a very small minority of pupils study modern foreign languages to GCSE level, which potentially restricts their choices for further study or employment.

p.3

Governance of the school

 Minutes of governors’ meetings show that they have challenged senior leaders over the standards that pupils achieve. In the past, they have sometimes been given a more favourable picture of the school’s progress than was the case. There is now a much more robust approach to holding the entire senior team to account, rather than just the headteacher. Teachers reported that they welcome greater accountability at all levels.  A significant budget deficit has been reduced. Governors have been decisive in making cost savings. The number of pupils coming to the school is increasing year on year, leading to greater stability in staffing.  Practice is stronger than policy. Some key policies have not been reviewed regularly enough and therefore do not reflect current practice.

p.3

Safeguarding

 The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.  The single central record meets requirements. Appropriate procedures are in place for child protection. There is a simple system for staff to report concerns about a pupil.  Leaders and managers enlist the support of external agencies to help to support pupils whose circumstances may make them vulnerable. Staff are appropriately trained in child protection. The vast majority of parents feel that their child is safe in school and that bullying is dealt with effectively.

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

 The quality of teaching varies both in and between subjects. In English, pupils make good progress due to consistently high expectations and well-taught lessons.  In other subjects such as mathematics, music, history, science, religious education and physical education, inspectors observed pupils making good progress.  In contrast, inspectors observed missed opportunities to promote good progress because pupils were insufficiently challenged by their learning, or expectations were too low.  Scrutiny of pupils’ books shows that the quality of teaching remains too variable, leading to inconsistencies in outcomes.  Pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities are making better progress than at the time of the previous inspection. However, the quality of support that they receive in lessons varies too much and, when support is less effective, progress is limited.  In the recent past, much store has been set on pupils passing tests, in order to make a

p.4

Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement

judgement about their progress. Not enough focus is given to what pupils can typically and independently do, to give a more accurate picture of their achievements. This has led to over-generous predictions about pupils’ outcomes.  Leaders and managers are now addressing this with a much more sophisticated approach to assessment, but there is still work to do.

p.4

Personal development and welfare

 The school’s work to promote pupils’ personal development and welfare requires improvement.  The vast majority of pupils show that they know how to be successful learners. However, there is a small minority who do not respect their education in the same way and contribute to low-level interruptions in class, such as talking over the teacher and distracting others.  A small minority of pupils and a few parents were concerned about bullying. Incidents of bullying are logged and followed up. Senior leaders are aware that procedures for dealing with bullying need to be tightened up.  Careers information, advice and guidance is effective. Year 11 pupils have a good understanding of their options for the next stage of their education, employment or training.

p.5

Behaviour

 The behaviour of pupils requires improvement.  There remains low-level disruption in a small minority of classes when teaching fails to engage pupils’ interest or the work is not challenging enough.  Pupils typically behave well at well-supervised social times. However, there are pockets of boisterous behaviour, particularly from older pupils. Pupils said that there is a lack of lunchtime activities, particularly on the Year 7 yard.  One parent commented: ‘My child has been made to feel very much part of the school. She has blossomed and made lots of new friends.’  Attendance is below the national average. The attendance of disadvantaged pupils has improved but also remains below the national average.

p.5

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Pupils arrive at school with abilities typical for their age. Progress is not yet consistently good in mathematics or for disadvantaged pupils.  The overall Progress 8 score for 2017 was broadly in line with the national average. Progress, particularly in English, science, history and religious education, has improved across the school, but, in mathematics, outcomes in key stage 4 remain well below national averages.  Observation of progress in lessons, scrutiny of pupils’ work and current assessment data shows that pupils’ progress in mathematics is improving, particularly in key stage 3. Outcomes for disadvantaged pupils are improving but they are not yet good.  The most able pupils were observed making better progress in lessons due to greater challenge in their learning. One parent commented: ‘As the parent of a high-attaining pupil, it is nice to see that he is being challenged academically.’

p.5

Outcomes for pupils Requires improvement

 Some pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities make good progress, particularly in key stage 4.  The few pupils who access alternative provisions attend regularly and are well supported to develop the broader social and employability skills that will enable them to find employment or further training when they leave. The vast majority of pupils continue to further education, employment or training when they leave school.

p.6

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.7

School details

Appropriate authority The governing body

p.7

School details

Email address headteacher@st-annes.stockport.sch.uk

p.7

School details

Date of previous inspection 8 ─ 9 October 2014

p.7

Information about this school

 There have been three temporary headteachers since the previous inspection. A substantive headteacher has been in post since May 2017.  The school does not meet requirements on the publication of information about the curriculum, provision for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities and governors’ attendance at meetings.  The school meets the current government floor standards.  Two pupils currently attend off-site alternative provision.

p.7

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed teaching across the school and carried out an extensive scrutiny of pupils’ work, including that of disadvantaged pupils, alongside their tracking information.  Inspectors had a telephone conversation with the chair of governors and met with other members of the governing body. Meetings were held with senior and middle leaders.  Inspectors spoke with a range of pupils both formally and at social times.  Inspectors scrutinised school policies and records relating to safeguarding, self- evaluation information and a range of other documentation.  There were 29 responses to the staff questionnaire. There were 16 responses to the pupil questionnaire.  There were 38 responses to Parent View to be considered and 33 free-text responses.

p.8

Inspection team

Sally Kenyon, lead inspector Ofsted Inspector

p.8

Inspection team

Jonathan Jones Her Majesty’s Inspector guidance ‘Raising concerns and making a complaint about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/publications/complaints-about-ofsted . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

Inspection team

In the report, ‘disadvantaged pupils’ refers to those pupils who attract government pupil premium funding: pupils claiming free school meals at any point in the last six years and pupils in care or who left care through adoption or another formal route. www.gov.uk/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and- alternative-provision-settings .

p.9

Inspection team

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

Inspection team

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted .

p.9

Inspection team

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children’s social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, further education and skills, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for children looked after, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Inspection team

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/ , write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .

p.9

Inspection team

Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our monthly newsletter for more information and updates: http://eepurl.com/iTrDn .

p.9

Inspection team

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion