Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Short school inspection

St Paul's Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Inspected 8 Nov 2017 · published 11 Dec 2017 · URN 121474

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    8 Nov 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Robert Jones

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    YO24 4BJ

  • Name on report verified

    St Paul’s Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+56Positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGood

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisestrongexcellenthigh-qualityrobustvery wellmake good progressclearhigh quality
Criticismweaknessesweaknessconcernsmissedbelowlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings982w+56
  • What needs to improve99w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,072
shorter than usual (typical 1483)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 8%About the inspection 8%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Miss Fiona Bennett Acting Headteacher St Paul’s Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School St Paul’s Terrace Holgate York North Yorkshire YO24 4BJ

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to the school on 8 November 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in January 2013.

p.1

Primary School

The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the last inspection. Parents are overwhelmingly supportive of the school’s work, of how well pupils behave and of leadership. Standards remain high in both key stages, and pupils continue to make good progress in reading, writing and mathematics.

p.1

Primary School

At the time of the inspection, you had only been in post as acting headteacher for a matter of weeks. It was clear to me that you have good plans, not just to maintain the high standards of education, but to build on them. One of your key priorities has been to develop the skills of middle leaders. This is already having a strong impact on standards in the early years and the development of writing across the school.

p.1

Primary School

Governors, led by two new chairs, are taking governance to the next stage in its successful journey. They have particularly strong skills in analysing achievement information and are using this to challenge and support school leaders. They have already identified and partly addressed weaknesses in the school’s website, which does not meet government requirements. School leaders and governors benefit from the support offered by being a member of a cluster of local schools.

p.1

Primary School

I was struck by pupils’ enthusiasm for learning. I could see from pupils’ work and from speaking to them that their love of learning stems from the lively curriculum, which often includes trips and visits. For example, pupils had been on a Jewish walking trip in York. This led to some excellent writing, particularly from boys, on the history of Judaism in the city. In turn, they then explored anti-Semitism in society, which developed their spiritual, social, moral and cultural awareness well.

p.1

Primary School

The previous inspection report asked you to make sure that work for the most able pupils made them think hard for themselves. The most able pupils now benefit from the richness in the curriculum, including extra-curricular groups. For example, the debating society helps pupils formulate original opinions and learn how to argue points maturely.

p.2

Primary School

Pupils behave well in lessons and in the playground. They told me that bullying is very rare and if it were to happen, there is always a caring adult to turn to. Behaviour records indicate that there are very few instances of bullying or bad behaviour. Pupils value the way in which their views are taken into account when they make suggestions through the active student council. As one pupil put it, ‘Staff really care and listen to us when we have any suggestion on how to make the school better.’

p.2

Primary School

The leadership team has ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose and records are detailed and of high quality. You have made sure that there is a strong culture of safeguarding in the school. All staff are clear that keeping pupils safe is everybody’s responsibility. Records show that any concerns are quickly identified and prompt actions and referrals are made where necessary.

p.2

Primary School

While your published safeguarding policy is not updated regularly enough, I was satisfied that your procedures and practice are robust. For example, the policy indicates that staff training took place several years ago. I found that, in fact, very regular high-quality training takes place. As a result, staff are very well informed about such issues as female genital mutilation and the prevention of extremism and radicalisation.

p.2

Primary School

The checks you make on staff on appointment are robust. Your record-keeping is efficient, organised and regularly reviewed.

p.2

Primary School

Pupils have a particularly good understanding of how to stay safe online and when using social media. They spoke to me knowledgeably about identity theft and about how an online presence can be safely managed. They also spoke to me in impressive detail about what they have learned in worship assemblies, which covered topics such as drugs and alcohol awareness and sexual exploitation.

p.2

Inspection findings

 Firstly, I was keen to find out whether children in the early years, particularly boys, are making better progress than in previous years. In 2017, the proportion of children exceeding the expected standards was well above the national average in all areas of learning. Boys, in particular, are now making much greater gains in their learning than before. Key to this success has been high-quality use of assessment information, detailed development plans and a deep understanding by your early years staff of how to develop children’s literacy and numeracy skills.  Secondly, I was curious to see why the least able pupils in key stage 2 made less progress than other pupils in 2016 and 2017, particularly in writing. When I did a work scrutiny with you, it was clear that the improvements you have made to the teaching of writing are benefiting these pupils. Consequently, their sentence writing, punctuation and vocabulary are improving quickly. However, you agreed

p.2

Inspection findings

that spelling continues to be a relative weakness for this group of pupils.  Thirdly, I investigated why pupils’ attainment in science in 2017 was below that in reading, writing and mathematics. I found that the quality of teaching in science varies. Where it is strong, pupils use scientific language regularly, have good knowledge of various science topics and use their literacy skills well. However, you agreed that in some classes challenge is low for the middle- and high-ability pupils. Moreover, sometimes there are missed opportunities for pupils to use and apply their good writing skills in science.

p.3

Next steps for the school

Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:

p.3

Next steps for the school

 pupils’ spelling improves at a faster rate, particularly their spelling of common words  pupils’ attainment in science rises so that it is in line with their high attainment in reading, writing and mathematics  the school’s website and the published safeguarding policy fully meet statutory requirements.

p.3

Next steps for the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of York, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for York. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Information about the inspection

During the inspection, I met with you, your senior leadership team and six members, including the two chairs, of the governing body. I spoke to pupils from Year 6 and from other classes as we visited classrooms. You and your early years leader accompanied me to observe teaching and to look through pupils’ books to see the work they had been doing over time.

p.3

Information about the inspection

I considered a range of documentation, including the 66 responses to Parent View, the summary of self-evaluation, the tracking of pupils’ progress and documents related to the safeguarding of pupils.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion