Schools & FE · Short school inspection
St Joseph's Catholic Primary School (Hertford)
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
9 Nov 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Kerry Grubb-Moore
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
SG14 2BU
- Name on report verified
St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- We saw some excellent examples of teachers using incisive questions to get p.2
- learning walk, we saw teachers using a range of strategies that help pupils make consistently good progress in almost all classes. p.2
- Your passion and enthusiasm for learning have ensured that your vision of ‘the very best standards of education for all pupils’ is willingly shared by your dedicated and supportive staff team. p.1
- Staff are overwhelmingly supportive of you and are incredibly positive about the changes you have made. p.1
- Your enthusiasm and passion are evident in the speed at which you have refreshed the learning environments and set a clear and precise action plan. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment12
“We saw some excellent examples of teachers using incisive questions to get” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,296
- about usual (typical 1483)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mrs Justine Page Headteacher St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School North Road Hertford Hertfordshire SG14 2BU
p.1
Short inspection of St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School
Following my visit to the school on 9 November 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. The visit was the first short inspection carried out since the school was judged to be good in July 2013.
p.1
Short inspection of St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School
The leadership team has maintained the good quality of education in the school since the previous inspection.
p.1
Short inspection of St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School
You started as the headteacher in September 2017 and have swiftly established an ethos in which ‘good is not enough’. Your passion and enthusiasm for learning have ensured that your vision of ‘the very best standards of education for all pupils’ is willingly shared by your dedicated and supportive staff team.
p.1
Short inspection of St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School
Staff are overwhelmingly supportive of you and are incredibly positive about the changes you have made. Parents who spoke to me during my visit, and almost all of those who responded to Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, highly commend the work you and your staff do. Ninety-seven per cent of parents would recommend the school. You have a very clear direction for the school, and the school community is right behind you on your journey.
p.1
Short inspection of St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School
The school environment is bright and inviting, with displays celebrating pupils’ work and achievements. Staff ensure that there is a purposeful focus on the use of resources to support pupils to become independent learners. It was a delight to be welcomed so warmly by the class ambassadors and to listen to pupils describing how they use resources to help them learn. For example, pupils told me how being able to hold and compare household items, such as a tin of beans and a bag of sugar, helped them quickly understand the concept of weight and kilograms. The previous inspection report stated that, to improve further, the school needed to focus on ensuring that teaching and learning, especially in mathematics, were consistently good or better across the school. You have accelerated the work you and your assistant headteachers undertake to monitor the quality of teaching and learning, and there have already been some very positive results. During our
p.1
Short inspection of St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School
learning walk, we saw teachers using a range of strategies that help pupils make consistently good progress in almost all classes.
p.2
Short inspection of St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School
Evidence from speaking with pupils and looking at their work in books shows that pupils are making good and sometimes accelerated progress in mathematics. Pupils’ attainment in the national tests in 2016 and 2017 at key stage 1 and key stage 2 was above the national average. In the best examples of pupils’ books, teachers set work which is challenging, and pupils are challenged to apply their reasoning and problem-solving skills. However, this is not consistent in every year group, and you identify the need to improve this further, especially for the most able pupils.
p.2
Short inspection of St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School
Leaders have created an environment where pupils feel safe, and staff and parents speak highly of the care and attention pupils receive. All staff are effectively trained to identify signs of harm and maintain detailed and well-considered logs of any concerns. Your team of designated safeguarding leaders works effectively with external agencies to ensure that, when needed, families have access to appropriate support services that meet their needs.
p.2
Short inspection of St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School
You ensure that pupils have their opinions heard. Your weekly ‘tea with the head’ ensures that a wide range of pupils have the opportunity to share their thoughts on their education, address any worries and celebrate successes. Pupils are happy. They state confidently, ‘Bullying doesn’t happen here but if it did we could speak to our trusted adult.’
p.2
Short inspection of St Joseph’s Catholic Primary School
All safeguarding records are of a high quality. The single central record is meticulously detailed, and all checks for the recruitment of staff are in place. Governors check, but do not regularly document, that safeguarding processes are implemented rigorously.
p.2
Inspection findings
My first line of enquiry, because you were new to post, was to establish the impact of your new leadership on sustaining standards since September. On arrival, you quickly identified the strengths and weaknesses of the school. Your enthusiasm and passion are evident in the speed at which you have refreshed the learning environments and set a clear and precise action plan. Leaders have worked collaboratively with the local authority to provide effective support for teachers who would benefit from it. This includes diminishing the difference in outcomes between boys’ and girls’ writing skills.
p.2
Inspection findings
You and your English leader’s work to improve standards of presentation has produced impressive results. Pupils’ books demonstrate a significant improvement in the use of cursive handwriting and pupils have an increased pride in the presentation of their work. Pupils who spoke with me were eager to show me how much their handwriting had improved as a result of this work. Additionally, our scrutiny of pupils’ writing from the beginning of the year demonstrates that they are no longer constrained by a prescribed set of questions and, consequently, the depth and quality of pupils’ writing have improved. The previous inspection report identified the need to make more teaching and learning good and outstanding. Therefore, the second key line of enquiry related to how well the quality of teaching and learning had been sustained and improved. We saw some excellent examples of teachers using incisive questions to get
p.2
Inspection findings
pupils to think about and explain why and how they had arrived at their answers. For example, Year 5 pupils expanded their mathematical knowledge to predict the number of factors that could be produced if they used prime or square numbers. You acknowledge that while you and your leadership team have seen clear indications of improvement since September, further work is required to embed the use of formative assessment. Then teachers can more rapidly respond to pupils’ needs, especially adapting questioning to stretch the most able pupils. My final key line of enquiry was to look at how effectively pupils apply their English and mathematical skills across the curriculum. This was because while standards are high, and attainment in 2017 at key stage 1 and key stage 2 in all areas was at least in line with the national average, pupils could make even better progress. Children in the early years and pupils in key stage 1 and key stage 2 regularly
p.3
Inspection findings
use their mathematical skills in the outside learning environment. Work in pupils’ science books shows how they consistently apply their data handling skills well to record experiment results. Subject leaders have increased the opportunities pupils have to apply their writing skills across the curriculum. Pupils are consistently using their spelling, punctuation and grammar skills in subjects other than English. Standards of presentation in books and pupils’ handwriting are equally good across all subjects. You have identified newly appointed subject leaders not yet taking full responsibility for monitoring and improving their subject area as an area for improvement. Prior to the inspection, the school’s website did not give an up-to-date overview of the curriculum provision. You highlighted quickly that your website is being updated. Before I left the school, your website was compliant and up to date.
p.3
Next steps for the school
Leaders and those responsible for governance should ensure that:
p.4
Next steps for the school
across all classes and year groups, the stretch and challenge for most-able pupils are consistent, enabling them to make rapid progress from their starting points subject leaders take increasing responsibility for the monitoring and development of their subjects, including increasing opportunities for pupils to practise and transfer their English and mathematical skills across the curriculum.
p.4
Next steps for the school
I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Archdiocese of Westminster, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Hertfordshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Information about the inspection
During the inspection, I spoke with you, your assistant headteachers and a selection of subject leaders, including the special educational needs coordinator. As one of my key lines of enquiry related to the wider curriculum, we reviewed an extensive range of pupils’ work including English, mathematics, geography, history, science, religious education and the work pupils produce in the outside learning environment. I also met with a group of most-able pupils from Year 5 and Year 6 to discuss their work.
p.4
Information about the inspection
Together, we visited all classes, including the mathematics morning attended by parents and the Nursery and Reception classes. We looked at pupils’ work and spoke to a large proportion of pupils while we were in lessons. I observed pupils’ conduct around school, in lessons and at playtime.
p.4
Information about the inspection
I held meetings with members of the governing body and a representative from the local authority. I also reviewed a range of school documentation, including governors’ minutes; your school’s development plan and self-evaluation document; safeguarding and recruitment records; child protection files; behaviour and safeguarding policies; the school’s website; and information relating to pupils’ progress. I also reviewed Ofsted’s online questionnaire, Parent View, and responses from 73 parents, as well as 101 pupil responses and 19 staff responses.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion