Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School monitoring visit

Setting

Inspected 8 Nov 2017

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Dimitris Spiliotis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    8 Nov 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Dimitris Spiliotis

  • Postcode verified

    NE1 3BT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyclearknowledgeablewell-preparedsecurestrengtheagerskilfully
Criticismshortcomingsseriousweaknessesconcernslowbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings257w0
  • Leadership700w+10

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
957
shorter than usual (typical 1570)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 26%Leadership 71%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mr Gareth Rowe Principal Discovery School Blandford Street Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BT

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Discovery School

Following my visit to your school on 8 November 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions that have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Serious weaknesses first monitoring inspection of Discovery School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in May 2017. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with you, the chair of the board of trustees, a representative of the sponsor and the sponsor’s chief executive officer, pupils from Year 9 and Year 10 and students from Year 13. I looked at the school’s security checks on members of staff and also evaluated the trust’s statement of action and the school's improvement plan.

p.1

Context

Since the school was last inspected in May 2017, you have been appointed as permanent principal in September 2017 following a brief period as principal designate. You conducted a full school audit and, as a result, you and the chair of trustees have restructured your senior leadership team. You have appointed a new leader to overview the use of pupil premium funding, provision for pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities and the provision for the most able pupils. Four members of your governing body have left, and your chair of trustees, with the support of the sponsor, has recruited new governors in key positions.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Your commitment and focus are crucial to the school’s recovery. The review you led as designate principal highlighted deep shortcomings in the school’s performance. Under your determined leadership, the school is beginning to undertake a programme of structural changes which started shortly after your permanent appointment in September 2017.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You have worked closely with your very knowledgeable chair of trustees and have well-prepared plans in place to address the school’s shortcomings and tackle the areas for improvement identified in the May 2017 inspection. All key stakeholders, including members of the governing body (trustees), know that considerable challenges remain and the school must further increase the pace of improvement to secure better outcomes for pupils. Governance of the school is becoming a strength. Both the sponsor and the trustees are fully aware of the degree of urgency needed for close monitoring and evaluation of the impact of the recently introduced systems and procedures.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Your newly restructured leadership team is eager to begin a phase of development work to improve the curriculum, strengthen the quality of teaching and secure better attendance and outcomes for pupils in your school. The senior leaders are clear about their roles and responsibilities. Your chair of trustees has strengthened the governance and structured it skilfully so that it provides appropriate challenge and support to senior leaders in their areas.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You have comprehensively improved the systems for tracking and analysing attendance. You have made some staff changes to allow capacity for your senior leader to effectively identify and support pupils who do not attend regularly. You can now identify issues with attendance for specific groups of pupils to allow you to target intervention more effectively. As a result, although still below national averages, overall attendance for this year to date shows improvement. You agreed with me that there is a need for further staff training to use the school systems even more effectively.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the inspection in May 2017, you revised your curriculum in order to provide more breadth and balance. As a result, in September 2017, you added geography, German and physical education to the curriculum. You and your senior leaders are aware of the need to include art and to further expand physical education as soon as it is financially viable to do so.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You have introduced new systems to track and monitor pupils’ progress and to provide teachers with appropriate information so that planned learning activities meet pupils’ varying needs and abilities. You have also closely linked performance management to professional development and the tracking and monitoring of the quality of teaching and learning. You recently introduced a regular quality assurance cycle so that you can monitor the impact of these changes on the quality of teaching and learning and outcomes for pupils and students in the sixth form.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You have sought external support from two local schools. This has helped you to gain a clear view of what is required to drive improvement in your school. The support provided for staff at all levels, including yourself and your senior leaders, has allowed you to shape clear improvement plans and procedures for the school in order to tackle the areas of concern identified during the last inspection.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The inspection in May 2017 recommended a review of the school’s use of the pupil premium. You acted swiftly and a review has been undertaken. As a result, a number of actions have been identified. You have begun to implement some of these actions, but at a slow pace. Leaders recognise that improvements have not happened fast enough and that more urgency is now needed in implementing and embedding the plans for the provision for disadvantaged pupils, as well as for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities and the most able.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection, the following judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Leaders and managers are taking effective actions towards the removal of the serious weaknesses designation.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The trust’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the chair of the board of trustees, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Newcastle upon Tyne. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion