Early years · Childminder inspection (EIF, requirements met)
Childminder in Greenwich
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
31 Aug 2017
- Inspectors verified
Nataliia Moroz
- Early years verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Outcomes verified
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development, behaviour and welfare verified
Inadequate
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Teaching, learning and assessment verified
Requires improvement
- Name on report verified
Childminder Report
- URN verified
EY383301
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2016.
- OverallInadequate
- Early yearsGood
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- OutcomesRequires improvement
- Personal development, behaviour and welfareInadequate
- Teaching, learning and assessmentRequires improvement
5% of comparable inspections in the last three years were graded Inadequate (17,905 inspections).
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- She has failed to identify and address weaknesses to help her improve practice and outcomes for children. p.4
- These breaches of requirements compromise children’s health and safety. p.4
- The childminder knows how to recognise that a child might be at risk of harm and the correct procedures to follow. p.4
- The childminder has failed to obtain parents’ permission prior to leaving minded children with another registered childminder. p.4
- The childminder’s self-evaluation is weak. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The childminder has a basic understanding of how to promote children’s learning and development as they play. p.4
- She observes children and follows their interests. p.4
- However, sometimes the childminder does not identify each child’s learning needs and stage of development soon enough. p.4
- She does not consistently use what she knows about the children to plan activities that provide challenge and help them to make the best possible progress. p.4
- Nevertheless, children are confident and enjoy themselves. p.4
- For example, older children freely choose painting, set it up independently and enjoy the activity while interacting with each other. p.4
- Younger children do not have such opportunities to be creative and experiment. p.4
- This is an area for development that has not been fully addressed following the previous inspection. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment5
“Risk assessment is ineffective.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 889
- about usual (typical 886)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 7
- Hedged sentences
- 15%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection date
Previous inspection date 31 August 2017 19 January 2016
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Requires improvement Personal development, behaviour and welfare Inadequate 4
p.1
This inspection: Inadequate 4
Outcomes for children Requires improvement
p.1
This provision is inadequate
Children’s safety is compromised. The childminder leaves children for short periods of time with another registered childminder without obtaining parents’ prior consent. The childminder does not meet the adult-to-child ratio requirements. This has a negative impact on the quality of care provided for the different age groups of children she looks after. Some required records are not available for inspection, for example, the childminder does not keep a record of children’s attendance. Risk assessment is ineffective. For example, during the inspection, the childminder had easily accessible medication in the area used for childminding. This puts children’s health at risk. The childminder does not provide appropriate first aid when minor accidents happen and does not keep written records of accidents as required. The childminder does not always identify each child’s learning needs and stage of
p.1
This provision is inadequate
development promptly. This means that some activities are not sufficiently challenging to help children make the best possible progress. The childminder does not help all children to develop their independence and self-care skills consistently. She does not organise some daily routines well enough to keep children engaged and motivated, for example, during lunch time. Younger children do not have enough opportunities to be creative and experiment.
p.1
It has the following strengths
Children have opportunities to learn about their local community and diversity. For example, they visit different local shops, playgroups and places of interest.
p.1
What the setting needs to do to improve further
To meet the requirements of the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register the provider must:
p.2
Due Date
ensure children are not left in the care of another registered childminder without parental consent 13/09/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure the adult-to-child ratio levels meet the children’s care and learning needs 13/09/2017
p.2
Due Date
use risk assessments effectively to ensure potential hazards to children are identified and eliminated to continuously maintain children’s safety, particularly in relation to keeping all medication out of children’s reach 13/09/2017
p.2
Due Date
take prompt and appropriate action when any accidents happen and keep a written record of accidents that is shared with parents 13/09/2017
p.2
Due Date
maintain an accurate daily record of the names of the children looked after on the premises and their hours of attendance 13/09/2017
p.2
Due Date
ensure all required documents are available for the inspection 13/09/2017 improve the use of assessment to accurately identify children’s starting points, individual needs and stage of development, and use this information to plan challenging activities and to monitor children’s ongoing progress more effectively 29/09/2017
p.2
Due Date
improve the quality of teaching throughout the day, ensure all children have opportunities to use age-appropriate equipment and resources and promote their independence and creative development effectively. 29/09/2017
p.2
Inspection activities
The inspection was carried out following the risk assessment process. The inspector spoke with the childminder and some children throughout the inspection. The inspector sampled some documents available, including those relating to the safeguarding and children registration. The inspector observed activities and daily routines.
p.3
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
The childminder does not meet requirements for the early years foundation stage and the Childcare Register. Safeguarding is ineffective. The childminder has failed to obtain parents’ permission prior to leaving minded children with another registered childminder. Moreover, she has exceeded the required adult-to-child ratio requirement and is not meeting all children’s learning and care needs. Not all required documents are available for inspection. The childminder does not maintain an accurate daily record of the names of the children looked after on the premises and their hours of attendance. The childminder knows how to recognise that a child might be at risk of harm and the correct procedures to follow. She keeps her knowledge of the latest legislation up to date, for example, through reading various online resources. The childminder maintains positive relationships with parents and keeps them well informed about their child’s day, for example, through
p.4
Effectiveness of the leadership and management is inadequate
sharing daily communication books for younger children. The childminder’s self-evaluation is weak. She has failed to identify and address weaknesses to help her improve practice and outcomes for children.
p.4
Quality of teaching, learning and assessment requires improvement
The childminder has a basic understanding of how to promote children’s learning and development as they play. She observes children and follows their interests. However, sometimes the childminder does not identify each child’s learning needs and stage of development soon enough. She does not consistently use what she knows about the children to plan activities that provide challenge and help them to make the best possible progress. Nevertheless, children are confident and enjoy themselves. For example, older children freely choose painting, set it up independently and enjoy the activity while interacting with each other. Younger children do not have such opportunities to be creative and experiment. This is an area for development that has not been fully addressed following the previous inspection.
p.4
Personal development, behaviour and welfare are inadequate
Children’s welfare is not fully supported. Although, the childminder identifies some potential hazards in the environment, she does not act promptly to minimise all risks. For example, during the inspection, some medications were easily accessible to children. Moreover, the childminder does not act appropriately when minor accidents happen and does not record them. These breaches of requirements compromise children’s health and safety. Some daily routines, such as meal times, are not organised well and children sit waiting for too long. This hinders their enjoyment of time spent at the setting. The childminder is kind and children behave well while in her care.
p.4
Outcomes for children require improvement
The weaknesses in teaching mean that children do not make as much progress as possible. Nonetheless, younger children develop their hand-eye coordination and learn new words, for example, while playing with inset puzzles. Older children learn to socialise and gain some basic skills needed for their move to school. However, the childminder does not ensure that all children are able to develop good independence skills.
p.4
Setting details
Unique reference number EY383301 Local authority Greenwich Inspection number 1108753 Type of provision Childminder Day care type Childminder Registers Early Years Register, Compulsory Childcare Register, Voluntary Childcare Register Age range of children 1 - 8 Total number of places 5 Number of children on roll 4
p.5
Name of registered person
Date of previous inspection 19 January 2016
p.5
Telephone number
The childminder registered in 2008. She lives in London borough of Greenwich. The childminder offers care all day from Monday to Friday for most of the year.
p.5
Telephone number
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of provision that is registered on the Early Years Register. The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and care, known as the early years foundation stage.
p.5
Telephone number
procedures set out in the guidance ‘Complaints procedure: raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted. If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.
p.5
Telephone number
If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk. You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/, write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk .
p.6
Telephone number
Interested in our work? You can subscribe to our website for news, information and updates at www.ofsted.gov.uk/user.
p.6
Telephone number
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/ofsted
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion