Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected 10 Nov 2017 · published 1 Dec 2017

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Martin Finch

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    10 Nov 2017

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Martin Finch

  • Postcode verified

    PE23 4PX

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentvery effectiveeffectivepositiveimprovingmake good progresssuccessfullysuccessful
Criticismtoo slownot consistentlynot strongslowlowpersistently absentlowerbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,127
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted

p.1

Mrs Sue Kay Headteacher Partney Church of England Aided Primary School Maddison Lane Partney Spilsby Lincolnshire PE23 4PX

p.1

England Aided Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 10 November 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

England Aided Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2017. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

England Aided Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order to become a good school.

p.1

England Aided Primary School

The school should take further action to:

p.1

England Aided Primary School

 increase the opportunities for pupils to reason mathematically  improve the range of vocabulary that pupils use in their writing.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, the early years leader and teacher, a group of pupils, members of the governing body including the chair and two vice-chairs. I held a phone call with a representative from Lincolnshire local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last monitoring visit. The school improvement plan was evaluated. I met with parents at the start of the school day. I visited every classroom and looked at pupils’ work. I also reviewed information relating to safeguarding and attendance.

p.1

Context

On 6 June 2017, the local authority issued the school with a warning notice because the local authority judged that action taken to improve the school was too slow. Two teachers resigned this year and two teachers were appointed in September 2017. The pace of change has increased markedly since June 2017. The school is now improving quickly.

p.2

Main findings

Leaders are now successfully moving the school forwards. You are leading the school well. You are monitoring the quality of teaching closely and checking pupils’ work, providing useful development points for teachers to follow. Teaching is improving.

p.2

Main findings

The school improvement plan is focused on the right priorities to improve teaching and learning. You have consulted with the governing body to ensure that the milestones within the plan are clear and measureable. Consequently, all staff and governors are fully aware of the areas for improvement and how and when they will judge if the actions taken have been successful.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body, after a slow start, is now effectively holding leaders to account. It has benefited from the support of an experienced chair of governors from another local school to help it to ask more challenging questions of school leaders. The minutes of governing body meetings show governors asking pertinent questions about pupils’ progress through the school. They have a good understanding of data and compare the school’s performance to other schools nationally.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body has sharpened the performance management arrangements for teachers and for you. It has worked with a representative from the Lincolnshire Diocese to set targets for the headteacher’s appraisal. The targets set for teachers are closely aligned to the school improvement priorities. Consequently, both teachers and you are being held to account for the actions that you take.

p.2

Main findings

Most teachers have responsibility for leading subjects. Appropriate training is in place to support new staff in their leadership roles. Leaders promote their subjects through delivering training at staff meetings and have started to check on the quality of teaching in other classes apart from their own. Governors also take part in learning walks to further develop their knowledge of how well the school is working. The leader of the early years works closely with the early years teacher to review planning and the assessments of the children. They have moderated children’s work with another school in partnership with the local authority to gain an accurate baseline of children’s abilities when they enter the school. They track the children’s progress and put interventions in place to support the children’s learning.

p.2

Main findings

Last year, the proportion of children who achieved a good level of development was very low. However, the majority of the children had low starting points and did make good progress but did not achieve a good level of development. These pupils are being closely tracked and specific interventions have been put in place to accelerate their progress in Year 1. Scrutiny of pupils’ work shows that these interventions are having a positive impact on pupils’ progress.

p.3

Main findings

Teachers are beginning to provide more challenging work for pupils. In key stage 1 and lower key stage 2, pupils are being given more opportunities to reason mathematically and to deepen their understanding of concepts. This is less strong in Years 5 and 6. However, leaders have recognised that pupils need to be provided with more challenges in mathematics throughout the school, to enable pupils to make accelerated progress, particularly the most able pupils.

p.3

Main findings

Teachers are providing pupils with more opportunities to develop their writing across different subject areas, particularly in science. Older pupils have written excellent sonnets as part of their Shakespeare studies in Years 5 and 6. However, pupils do not consistently use imaginative vocabulary in their writing to add interest to the reader.

p.3

Main findings

Pupils are presenting their work neatly, both written work and their recording in mathematics. They take pride in their learning journeys. Teachers are consistently using the school’s marking and feedback policy, which the pupils understand well.

p.3

Main findings

Pupils’ attendance has risen. Last year the attendance of all pupils was in line with the national average and the proportion of pupils who were persistently absent was just below the national average. You monitor attendance rigorously and work closely with parents to overcome potential barriers to good attendance. Pupils are also motivated by the attendance certificates that have recently been introduced.

p.3

External support

The support and challenge of the adviser from Lincolnshire local authority has been very effective. Following the inspection in January 2017, she applied for funding which has allowed support to your school from Long Sutton Primary School. This support has had a positive impact. The headteacher from Long Sutton has supported you to write an effective school improvement plan and to set sharp targets for teachers’ appraisals. Teachers have benefited by observing good practice at Long Sutton and they have also received support to improve their subject leadership. The quality of leadership at the school is improving.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the director of education for the Diocese of Lincoln, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for Lincolnshire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion