Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
14 Nov 2017
- Inspectorssingle source
Janet Pearce
- Postcode verified
TN31 7NQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- At the beginning of the term, leaders identified some poor practice around the ways in which students were registered and their attendance tracked. p.3
- Firm action has been taken with individuals whose absence is causing concern, including the issuing of penalty notices to families. p.3
- Nevertheless, attendance figures are still too low and are below national averages. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Following my visit to your school on 14 November 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. p.1
- Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection. p.1
- The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2016. p.1
- It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. p.1
- Senior leaders and members of the trust are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order for the school to become a good school. p.1
- During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, senior leaders, the chief executive of the Rye Academy Trust, the attendance officer, trustees and with a group of students, to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. p.1
- Plans to improve the school were reviewed and evaluated. p.1
- Her Majesty’s Inspector observed teaching and learning in all classes and several subjects, including mathematics, creative writing, creative media, science, music, performing arts and photography. p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,587
- longer than usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted
p.1
Mr Barry Blakelock Headteacher Rye Studio School The Grove Rye East Sussex TN31 7NQ
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Rye Studio School
Following my visit to your school on 14 November 2017, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Rye Studio School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2016. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Rye Studio School
Senior leaders and members of the trust are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection in order for the school to become a good school.
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Rye Studio School
The school should take further action to:
p.1
Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Rye Studio School
prepare students better for the next stage in their education or career, both personally and academically improve teaching and learning, particularly in questioning and raising expectations of what students can achieve, especially for those who are most able improve students’ attendance and reduce rates of persistent or casual absence.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, senior leaders, the chief executive of the Rye Academy Trust, the attendance officer, trustees and with a group of students, to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. Plans to improve the school were reviewed and evaluated. Her Majesty’s Inspector observed teaching and learning in all classes and several subjects, including mathematics, creative writing, creative media, science, music, performing arts and photography. Information about students’ current attendance and rates of persistent absence was scrutinised, as was information about students’ current progress and attainment. Her Majesty’s Inspector also reviewed the school’s recent work to monitor the quality of teaching.
p.1
Context
Since the last inspection, there have been a number of major changes to leadership and provision in the school. In September 2016, the current chief executive officer of the academy trust was appointed and carried out a full review of the performance of the whole trust, including Rye Studio School, neighbouring Rye College and Rye Community Primary School. The local governing board resigned. A new chair was appointed to preside over a single board of trustees, overseeing the whole academy trust provision. The previous senior leadership team also left the school, together with a number of teaching and support staff. From September 2017, a seconded headteacher from another academy trust was appointed to lead the studio school and Rye College. Other senior leaders have been seconded to support leadership across both schools. The current leader for key stage 5 has stepped up to take on leadership of the quality of teaching and learning. An
p.2
Context
attendance officer was appointed at the beginning of the autumn term, to oversee attendance at both the studio school and Rye College.
p.2
Context
The new board of trustees made the decision to close Rye Studio School and merge the site with Rye College, as from September 2018. No students have been admitted into Year 10 or Year 12 this academic year. There are fewer students on the studio school roll than there were at the time of the last inspection, with only students in Year 11 and Year 13 completing courses this year. Owing to financial constraints and low student take-up, some courses in the studio school have ceased to operate. Some students attend courses at the Rye College site and are taught by Rye College teachers. At the time of this inspection, the Rye Academy Trust was seeking a new academy trust to take over the running of the whole provision.
p.2
Main findings
Staff and students have been through a difficult time in the studio school since the last inspection. Initially, actions to improve it were too slow. Constraints around recruitment, changes in leadership and financial restrictions led to delays in key improvements that were beyond the control of the current senior team. On their appointment, in September 2017, the new leaders responded swiftly to the areas identified for improvement at the last inspection. They rightly focused on the most urgent shortfalls. As a result, students are safer and their attendance has increased. Teaching is beginning to improve and students are making more progress, especially in mathematics. Leaders are reflective, constantly review the impact of their actions and are receptive to guidance. They are astute and know how much the whole trust needs to improve. Trust leaders thoroughly reviewed the performance of the studio school,
p.2
Main findings
and took decisive action to restructure leadership and streamline the curriculum. Trust and school leaders have had to work within budgetary constraints, but have also carefully considered the wider implications for the local community.
p.3
Main findings
New leaders have, understandably, focused on ensuring that students in the studio school are safeguarded. At the beginning of the term, leaders identified some poor practice around the ways in which students were registered and their attendance tracked. The whole system for registering students has now been completely tightened up. An attendance officer, supported by senior leaders, follows up non- attendance rigorously. Registers are completed lesson by lesson. Expectations of students’ attendance are higher. Firm action has been taken with individuals whose absence is causing concern, including the issuing of penalty notices to families. Leaders now know where the poor attenders are and are able to safeguard them more effectively, particularly if these students have additional vulnerabilities. Leaders can point to the attendance of several individual students that has improved following some direct intervention.
p.3
Main findings
Nevertheless, attendance figures are still too low and are below national averages. There is a lingering culture of casual absence within the studio school and leaders are wise to keep on top of this. In addition, a few students are not fully clear about the new systems and procedures for signing in, if they are late for school. These students are taking time to get used to the raised expectations.
p.3
Main findings
Senior leaders rightly identified that they needed to ensure that Year 11 students were getting a better deal in their core subjects, particularly mathematics. Sensible changes to students’ timetables and better specialist teaching have led to improvements. Students are now being prepared more effectively for their GCSE examinations. They report that they feel more challenged and are aiming for higher grades, in line with their prior attainment. Teachers have identified and begun to tackle the specific gaps in students’ learning in mathematics. However, for some students, their mathematical reasoning is still underdeveloped. Initial reviews of students’ progress in mathematics indicate that they are achieving more. However, there are still not enough students building upon their natural ability and prior attainment.
p.3
Main findings
It is too early to evaluate the full impact of senior leaders’ improvements to teaching and learning in other subjects. Leaders are still at the stage of identifying exactly where the shortfalls are. They have mostly focused on whether teachers are meeting leaders’ raised expectations, rather than their impact on students’ progress. Her Majesty’s Inspector agreed with senior leaders’ assessment that the most able students are not challenged enough, even in subject areas where attainment has historically been stronger. Teachers’ questioning is beginning to improve and, where this is effective, students are prompted to think more deeply, recall previous knowledge and respond more precisely. However, the quality of questioning is not consistently probing or thought provoking, which places a ceiling on the most able students’ achievement.
p.3
Main findings
Students’ welfare continues to be nurtured well and they value the support they receive. While personal coaching supports students with their vulnerabilities, there have been some unintended consequences. Some students are not sufficiently outward looking or as resilient as they should be for their age. Many know that they need to make more progress and catch up, but are too easily cast down by criticism. Students in Year 11 told Her Majesty’s Inspector that they felt ‘unwanted’ and did not fit in when attending lessons at Rye College. These students do not fully understand why new arrangements have been made or how to manage change themselves. In short, some younger students have not been prepared as well as they should be for further education or employment.
p.4
Main findings
The new board of trustees possess a clear understanding of its accountabilities and members are experienced in governance. Trustees are wisely developing a view of the provision as a whole and are planning a long-term strategy to improve the performance of the trust. However, it is very early days in the new board’s tenure. Trustees rightly realise that they must champion the remaining students in the studio school and hold leaders to account for their progress and destinations.
p.4
External support
Leaders benefit from a strong partnership with a local school catering for pupils who have special educational needs and/or disabilities. In addition, the trust has commissioned two reviews since September 2017, carried out by a consultant headteacher. His findings were clearly helpful in providing evidence of what needed to improve and what the urgent priorities were. His local knowledge and experience have helped to support the new leadership team and trustees. East Sussex local authority has provided useful support and guidance with the school’s work to improve attendance and reduce persistent absence.
p.4
External support
I am copying this letter to the chief executive officer of the Rye Academy Trust, the chair of trustees, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children’s services for East Sussex. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion